Development of a Multivariable Predictive Model for Adherence to Remotely Monitored Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Sheng Ye, Zi Chen, Dandan Zhang, Tingting Xia, Caihua Wang, Biyun Xu, Qin Li, Cheng Wang, Ye Zhang, Zhifei Yin, Jinfan Wang
{"title":"Development of a Multivariable Predictive Model for Adherence to Remotely Monitored Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Sheng Ye, Zi Chen, Dandan Zhang, Tingting Xia, Caihua Wang, Biyun Xu, Qin Li, Cheng Wang, Ye Zhang, Zhifei Yin, Jinfan Wang","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S534600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore factors affecting adherence to remote home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to develop a predictive model.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multicenter, cross-sectional survey study included 86 patients who underwent 12 weeks of health education-integrated, home-based PR with remote monitoring. Patients were stratified into high-completion (HC, ≥ 70%) and low-completion (LC, < 70%) groups. Demographic data, clinical features, and psychological parameters were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses evaluated the predictive performance of key indicators. Binary logistic regression identified four predictors: Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE), Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale (OEE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). These components formed an optimized predictive model with corresponding formula and cutoff values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 71 patients, 44 in the HC group and 27 in the LC group, revealed significantly higher scores in the HC group in the following domains of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), including physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, mental health, and social functioning, as well as in the MoCA scores (all p-values < 0.05). Significant intergroup differences were also observed in PRAISE, OEE and VAS scores (all p < 0.001). PRAISE (AUC = 0.810), OEE (AUC = 0.784), MoCA (AUC = 0.719), and VAS (AUC = 0.801) demonstrated discriminatory power in assessing PR adherence. The combined predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.895 (95% confidence interval: 0.812-0.977, p < 0.05), with 77.8% sensitivity and 93.2% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social cognitive theory (SCT) originated from social learning theory. It explains human behavior through a triadic, dynamic, and reciprocal model. This model posits continuous interaction among an individual's behavior, cognitive factors, and environmental context. The four-variable predictive model, based on SCT, effectively evaluates adherence to home-based PR under remote monitoring in patients with COPD. Among the indicators in the four-variable model, PRAISE shows potential as a target for intervention to enhance PR completion rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"3361-3375"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S534600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore factors affecting adherence to remote home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to develop a predictive model.

Patients and methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional survey study included 86 patients who underwent 12 weeks of health education-integrated, home-based PR with remote monitoring. Patients were stratified into high-completion (HC, ≥ 70%) and low-completion (LC, < 70%) groups. Demographic data, clinical features, and psychological parameters were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses evaluated the predictive performance of key indicators. Binary logistic regression identified four predictors: Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE), Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale (OEE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). These components formed an optimized predictive model with corresponding formula and cutoff values.

Results: A cross-sectional survey of 71 patients, 44 in the HC group and 27 in the LC group, revealed significantly higher scores in the HC group in the following domains of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), including physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, mental health, and social functioning, as well as in the MoCA scores (all p-values < 0.05). Significant intergroup differences were also observed in PRAISE, OEE and VAS scores (all p < 0.001). PRAISE (AUC = 0.810), OEE (AUC = 0.784), MoCA (AUC = 0.719), and VAS (AUC = 0.801) demonstrated discriminatory power in assessing PR adherence. The combined predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.895 (95% confidence interval: 0.812-0.977, p < 0.05), with 77.8% sensitivity and 93.2% specificity.

Conclusion: Social cognitive theory (SCT) originated from social learning theory. It explains human behavior through a triadic, dynamic, and reciprocal model. This model posits continuous interaction among an individual's behavior, cognitive factors, and environmental context. The four-variable predictive model, based on SCT, effectively evaluates adherence to home-based PR under remote monitoring in patients with COPD. Among the indicators in the four-variable model, PRAISE shows potential as a target for intervention to enhance PR completion rates.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者坚持远程监测家庭肺康复的多变量预测模型的建立
目的:本研究旨在探讨影响稳定型慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者远程居家肺康复(PR)依从性的因素,并建立预测模型。患者和方法:这项多中心、横断面调查研究包括86名患者,他们接受了12周的健康教育结合、以家庭为基础的PR和远程监测。患者被分为高完成率(HC,≥70%)和低完成率(LC, < 70%)组。分析人口统计学资料、临床特征和心理参数。受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)分析评价了关键指标的预测性能。二元逻辑回归确定了四个预测因子:肺康复自我效能适应指数(PRAISE)、运动结果预期量表(OEE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。这些分量组成了一个优化的预测模型,有相应的公式和截止值。结果:对71例患者(HC组44例,LC组27例)的横断面调查显示,HC组在36项简短健康调查(SF-36)的以下领域得分显著高于HC组,包括身体功能、身体健康导致的角色限制、情绪问题导致的角色限制、精力/疲劳、心理健康和社会功能,以及MoCA得分(p值均< 0.05)。在PRAISE、OEE和VAS评分方面,组间差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。PRAISE (AUC = 0.810)、OEE (AUC = 0.784)、MoCA (AUC = 0.719)和VAS (AUC = 0.801)在评估PR依从性方面具有歧视性。联合预测模型的AUC为0.895(95%可信区间:0.812-0.977,p < 0.05),敏感性77.8%,特异性93.2%。结论:社会认知理论起源于社会学习理论。它通过三合一的、动态的和相互的模型来解释人类的行为。该模型假定个体行为、认知因素和环境背景之间存在持续的相互作用。基于SCT的四变量预测模型有效地评估了COPD患者在远程监测下家庭PR的依从性。在四变量模型的指标中,PRAISE显示出作为干预目标提高PR完成率的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信