Mandated Sick Pay: Coverage, Utilization, and Crowding-in.

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Journal of the European Economic Association Pub Date : 2025-02-22 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1093/jeea/jvaf008
Johanna Catherine Maclean, Stefan Pichler, Nicolas R Ziebarth
{"title":"Mandated Sick Pay: Coverage, Utilization, and Crowding-in.","authors":"Johanna Catherine Maclean, Stefan Pichler, Nicolas R Ziebarth","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using the National Compensation Survey from 2009 to 2022 and difference-in-differences methods, we find that state-level sick pay mandates are effective in broadening access to paid sick leave for U.S. workers. Increases in sick pay coverage reach 30 percentage points from a 63% baseline 5 years post-mandate. Mandates have more bite in jobs with low pre-mandate coverage. Further, mandates reduce inequality in access to paid sick leave substantially, both across and within firms. COVID-19 reinforced existing upward trends in coverage and take-up. Five years post mandate, sick leave use has linearly increased to 2.4 days per year for marginal jobs. Finally, we find <i>crowding-in</i> of non-mandated benefits, which we label \"job upscaling\" by firms to differentiate jobs and attract labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":48297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Economic Association","volume":"23 5","pages":"1868-1907"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Economic Association","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaf008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the National Compensation Survey from 2009 to 2022 and difference-in-differences methods, we find that state-level sick pay mandates are effective in broadening access to paid sick leave for U.S. workers. Increases in sick pay coverage reach 30 percentage points from a 63% baseline 5 years post-mandate. Mandates have more bite in jobs with low pre-mandate coverage. Further, mandates reduce inequality in access to paid sick leave substantially, both across and within firms. COVID-19 reinforced existing upward trends in coverage and take-up. Five years post mandate, sick leave use has linearly increased to 2.4 days per year for marginal jobs. Finally, we find crowding-in of non-mandated benefits, which we label "job upscaling" by firms to differentiate jobs and attract labor.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

强制病假工资:覆盖范围,使用和拥挤。
利用2009年至2022年的国家薪酬调查和差异中的差异方法,我们发现州一级的病假工资规定有效地扩大了美国工人获得带薪病假的机会。在授权后5年,病假工资覆盖范围从63%的基线增加30个百分点。授权对授权前覆盖率较低的工作岗位影响更大。此外,授权大大减少了公司之间和公司内部获得带薪病假的不平等。COVID-19加强了现有的覆盖率和使用率上升趋势。任务完成五年后,边缘工作的病假使用已线性增加到每年2.4天。最后,我们发现了非强制性福利的挤入,我们将其称为“工作升级”,由公司区分工作和吸引劳动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of the European Economic Association replaces the European Economic Review as the official journal of the association. JEEA publishes articles of the highest scientific quality and is an outlet for theoretical and empirical work with global relevance. The journal is committed to promoting the ambitions of the EEA: the development and application of economics as a science, as well as the communication and exchange between teachers, researchers and students in economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信