M El Kafhali, M Tahmasbi, A Rahmouni, M Khalis, A El Moutaoukkil, R Sebihi, A El Kessioui
{"title":"Advanced monitoring of TOF+PSF reconstruction performance in digital PET/CT: Clinical implications from the uMI 550 evaluation.","authors":"M El Kafhali, M Tahmasbi, A Rahmouni, M Khalis, A El Moutaoukkil, R Sebihi, A El Kessioui","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advancements in digital PET/CT technology have enabled more precise quantification and image quality optimization. This study evaluated the reconstruction performance of the uMI 550 digital PET/CT system using standardized phantoms, focusing on reconstruction algorithms incorporating Time-of-Flight (TOF) and Point Spread Function (PSF) modeling. Unlike prior uMI 550 evaluations, this study integrates uncertainty-based analysis and longitudinal QC correlations to determine optimal reconstruction conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Performance assessments followed NEMA NU 2-2007 protocols with a NEMA IEC image quality phantom and QC phantoms. The analysis examined contrast recovery, image noise, and standardized uptake value (SUV) metrics (SUVmax (single hottest voxel), SUVmean (average uptake in a region), and SUVpeak (average uptake within a fixed 1 cm<sup>3</sup> around the hottest area)), under varying reconstruction settings, with integration of uncertainty modeling and quality-control (QC) correlations. Count-rate performance was assessed using Noise Equivalent Count Rate (NECR) and true count rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrast recovery rose from 89.1 % at iteration 1-152.2 % at iteration 4, after which further iterations increased noise without added benefit. SUVmean remained stable (1.01 ± 0.03), SUVpeak converged rapidly with minimal sensitivity to reconstruction, while SUVmax overshot to 1.34 by iteration 6 due to edge artifacts. Count-rate analysis showed peak NECR at 17.2 kBq/mL and maximum true count rate of 479.4 kcps at 26.3 kBq/mL, with quantification errors consistently below 5 %. Correlation analysis (r > 0.85) identified SUVpeak, SUVmean, NECR, and contrast recovery as the most influential QC parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SUVpeak emerged as the most robust quantitative biomarker, providing practical guidance for protocol optimization, harmonized PET/CT workflows, and long-term system monitoring.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Adopting evidence-based reconstruction strategies and consistent QC can improve diagnostic confidence and standardization in clinical PET/CT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 6","pages":"103192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.103192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Advancements in digital PET/CT technology have enabled more precise quantification and image quality optimization. This study evaluated the reconstruction performance of the uMI 550 digital PET/CT system using standardized phantoms, focusing on reconstruction algorithms incorporating Time-of-Flight (TOF) and Point Spread Function (PSF) modeling. Unlike prior uMI 550 evaluations, this study integrates uncertainty-based analysis and longitudinal QC correlations to determine optimal reconstruction conditions.
Methods: Performance assessments followed NEMA NU 2-2007 protocols with a NEMA IEC image quality phantom and QC phantoms. The analysis examined contrast recovery, image noise, and standardized uptake value (SUV) metrics (SUVmax (single hottest voxel), SUVmean (average uptake in a region), and SUVpeak (average uptake within a fixed 1 cm3 around the hottest area)), under varying reconstruction settings, with integration of uncertainty modeling and quality-control (QC) correlations. Count-rate performance was assessed using Noise Equivalent Count Rate (NECR) and true count rate.
Results: Contrast recovery rose from 89.1 % at iteration 1-152.2 % at iteration 4, after which further iterations increased noise without added benefit. SUVmean remained stable (1.01 ± 0.03), SUVpeak converged rapidly with minimal sensitivity to reconstruction, while SUVmax overshot to 1.34 by iteration 6 due to edge artifacts. Count-rate analysis showed peak NECR at 17.2 kBq/mL and maximum true count rate of 479.4 kcps at 26.3 kBq/mL, with quantification errors consistently below 5 %. Correlation analysis (r > 0.85) identified SUVpeak, SUVmean, NECR, and contrast recovery as the most influential QC parameters.
Conclusion: SUVpeak emerged as the most robust quantitative biomarker, providing practical guidance for protocol optimization, harmonized PET/CT workflows, and long-term system monitoring.
Implications for practice: Adopting evidence-based reconstruction strategies and consistent QC can improve diagnostic confidence and standardization in clinical PET/CT imaging.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.