Validation of Recalibrated IOPVet in Canine Eyes Compared to Manometry and Recalibrated TONOVET Plus.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Bertrand Michaud, Inès Desquiens
{"title":"Validation of Recalibrated IOPVet in Canine Eyes Compared to Manometry and Recalibrated TONOVET Plus.","authors":"Bertrand Michaud, Inès Desquiens","doi":"10.1111/vop.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical and manometric accuracy of a recalibrated version of the IOPVet indentation tonometer in dogs, and to compare its performance to a recalibrated TonoVet Plus (rTVP) and in situ direct manometry.</p><p><strong>Animals studied: </strong>A total of 97 eyes from 49 client-owned dogs were enrolled and divided into three groups: a glaucomatous group of 34 dogs (67 eyes: 41 glaucomatous, 26 fellow normotensive eyes), a control group of 10 healthy dogs (20 eyes), and a manometric group of 10 eyes from 5 euthanized dogs.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>IOP was measured using both the rTVP and the recalibrated IOPVet, each device being used by a separate examiner. IOPVet readings were recorded as semi-quantitative intervals: < 10, 10-29, 30-49, and ≥ 50 mmHg. Agreement with rTVP and manometric values was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and Chi-square analysis. Manometry was performed post-mortem using dual-needle in situ cannulation over a range of pressures (10-70 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All glaucomatous eyes (rTVP ≥ 30 mmHg, n = 41) were correctly classified by the IOPVet (sensitivity 100%). Among normotensive eyes (rTVP ≤ 29 mmHg, n = 46), 78.3% were correctly categorized, with 21.7% overestimated (specificity 84.8%). The association between rTVP and IOPVet categories was significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 50.2, df = 4, p < 0.0001). In manometric validation, accuracy was 95% (10-29 mmHg), 100% (30-49 mmHg), and 94% (≥ 50 mmHg), with no misclassification below 30 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recalibrated IOPVet demonstrates markedly improved accuracy, excellent sensitivity, and acceptable specificity in detecting elevated IOP in dogs. Its affordability and ease of use support its integration into clinical practice and owner-assisted glaucoma monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23836,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.70100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and manometric accuracy of a recalibrated version of the IOPVet indentation tonometer in dogs, and to compare its performance to a recalibrated TonoVet Plus (rTVP) and in situ direct manometry.

Animals studied: A total of 97 eyes from 49 client-owned dogs were enrolled and divided into three groups: a glaucomatous group of 34 dogs (67 eyes: 41 glaucomatous, 26 fellow normotensive eyes), a control group of 10 healthy dogs (20 eyes), and a manometric group of 10 eyes from 5 euthanized dogs.

Procedures: IOP was measured using both the rTVP and the recalibrated IOPVet, each device being used by a separate examiner. IOPVet readings were recorded as semi-quantitative intervals: < 10, 10-29, 30-49, and ≥ 50 mmHg. Agreement with rTVP and manometric values was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and Chi-square analysis. Manometry was performed post-mortem using dual-needle in situ cannulation over a range of pressures (10-70 mmHg).

Results: All glaucomatous eyes (rTVP ≥ 30 mmHg, n = 41) were correctly classified by the IOPVet (sensitivity 100%). Among normotensive eyes (rTVP ≤ 29 mmHg, n = 46), 78.3% were correctly categorized, with 21.7% overestimated (specificity 84.8%). The association between rTVP and IOPVet categories was significant (χ2 = 50.2, df = 4, p < 0.0001). In manometric validation, accuracy was 95% (10-29 mmHg), 100% (30-49 mmHg), and 94% (≥ 50 mmHg), with no misclassification below 30 mmHg.

Conclusions: The recalibrated IOPVet demonstrates markedly improved accuracy, excellent sensitivity, and acceptable specificity in detecting elevated IOP in dogs. Its affordability and ease of use support its integration into clinical practice and owner-assisted glaucoma monitoring.

与测压法和重新校准的TONOVET Plus相比,重新校准的IOPVet在犬眼中的验证。
目的:评估重新校准版IOPVet压痕眼压计在犬体内的临床和测压精度,并将其性能与重新校准的TonoVet Plus (rTVP)和原位直接测压法进行比较。研究动物:49只客户拥有的狗共97只眼睛被纳入研究,并分为三组:青光眼组34只狗(67只眼睛:41只青光眼,26只正常眼睛),对照组10只健康狗(20只眼睛),以及测压组5只安乐死狗的10只眼睛。操作步骤:使用rTVP和重新校准的IOPVet测量眼压,每个设备由单独的审查员使用。结果:所有青光眼(rTVP≥30 mmHg, n = 41)均被IOPVet正确分类(灵敏度100%)。在正常血压眼(rTVP≤29 mmHg, n = 46)中,78.3%被正确分类,21.7%被高估(特异性为84.8%)。rTVP与IOPVet分类之间存在显著相关性(χ2 = 50.2, df = 4, p)。结论:重新校准的IOPVet在检测犬IOP升高方面具有显著提高的准确性、良好的灵敏度和可接受的特异性。它的可负担性和易用性支持其整合到临床实践和业主辅助青光眼监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary ophthalmology
Veterinary ophthalmology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
37.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, international journal that welcomes submission of manuscripts directed towards academic researchers of veterinary ophthalmology, specialists and general practitioners with a strong ophthalmology interest. Articles include those relating to all aspects of: Clinical and investigational veterinary and comparative ophthalmology; Prospective and retrospective studies or reviews of naturally occurring ocular disease in veterinary species; Experimental models of both animal and human ocular disease in veterinary species; Anatomic studies of the animal eye; Physiological studies of the animal eye; Pharmacological studies of the animal eye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信