Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Zixin Wang, Jiamin Li, Xinyi Wang, Boyi Yuan, Jiameng Li, Qingfeng Ma
{"title":"Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Zixin Wang, Jiamin Li, Xinyi Wang, Boyi Yuan, Jiameng Li, Qingfeng Ma","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether TNK (tenecteplase) benefits patients with acute ischemic stroke treated within 4.5 to 24 hours remains uncertain, and no previous meta-analysis has differentiated between clinical settings where endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is unavailable or permitted, leading to pooled distinct clinical contexts and obscuring a clear estimation of TNK's net effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous TNK of 0.25 mg/kg with standard care or placebo in adults within 4.5 to 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke onset. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) at 90 days, with additional efficacy and safety end points. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed both overall and within predefined subgroups, stratified by whether EVT was permitted in individual studies (non-EVT versus EVT-permitted).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four multicenter randomized controlled trials enrolling 1278 patients were included. TNK significantly increased excellent functional outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.34 [95% CI, 1.06-1.71]; <i>P</i>=0.02) at 90 days and recanalization (OR, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.59-6.84]; <i>P</i>=0.001) compared with the control group, whereas good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2), reperfusion, and early neurological improvement did not differ significantly. Subgroup analyses of 596 patients in the non-EVT subgroup showed that TNK significantly improved excellent functional outcome (OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.02-2.08]; <i>P</i>=0.04), good functional outcome (OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.07-2.09]; <i>P</i>=0.02), recanalization (OR, 6.17 [95% CI, 3.36-11.33]; <i>P</i><0.00001), and early neurological improvement (OR, 3.21 [95% CI, 1.82-5.66]; <i>P</i><0.0001). However, in the EVT-permitted subgroup of 682 patients, TNK only improved recanalization (OR, 2.36 [95% CI, 1.34-4.17]; <i>P</i>=0.003). No significant differences were observed between TNK and control in the risks of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or 90-day mortality, either in the overall or subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TNK improves excellent functional outcomes and recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated within 4.5 to 24 hours, without increasing the risks of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or mortality. Notably, extended-window TNK provides greater additional benefits when EVT is inaccessible, establishing its role as an alternative reperfusion strategy in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053256","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether TNK (tenecteplase) benefits patients with acute ischemic stroke treated within 4.5 to 24 hours remains uncertain, and no previous meta-analysis has differentiated between clinical settings where endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is unavailable or permitted, leading to pooled distinct clinical contexts and obscuring a clear estimation of TNK's net effect.

Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous TNK of 0.25 mg/kg with standard care or placebo in adults within 4.5 to 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke onset. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) at 90 days, with additional efficacy and safety end points. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed both overall and within predefined subgroups, stratified by whether EVT was permitted in individual studies (non-EVT versus EVT-permitted).

Results: Four multicenter randomized controlled trials enrolling 1278 patients were included. TNK significantly increased excellent functional outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.34 [95% CI, 1.06-1.71]; P=0.02) at 90 days and recanalization (OR, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.59-6.84]; P=0.001) compared with the control group, whereas good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2), reperfusion, and early neurological improvement did not differ significantly. Subgroup analyses of 596 patients in the non-EVT subgroup showed that TNK significantly improved excellent functional outcome (OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.02-2.08]; P=0.04), good functional outcome (OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.07-2.09]; P=0.02), recanalization (OR, 6.17 [95% CI, 3.36-11.33]; P<0.00001), and early neurological improvement (OR, 3.21 [95% CI, 1.82-5.66]; P<0.0001). However, in the EVT-permitted subgroup of 682 patients, TNK only improved recanalization (OR, 2.36 [95% CI, 1.34-4.17]; P=0.003). No significant differences were observed between TNK and control in the risks of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or 90-day mortality, either in the overall or subgroup analyses.

Conclusions: TNK improves excellent functional outcomes and recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated within 4.5 to 24 hours, without increasing the risks of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or mortality. Notably, extended-window TNK provides greater additional benefits when EVT is inaccessible, establishing its role as an alternative reperfusion strategy in resource-limited settings.

替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性中风4.5 ~ 24小时:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
背景:TNK (tenecteplase)是否对4.5 - 24小时内接受治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者有益仍然不确定,并且之前没有荟萃分析区分了血管内血栓切除术(EVT)不可用或允许的临床环境,导致合并了不同的临床背景,模糊了对TNK净效应的明确估计。方法:我们检索了随机对照试验,比较急性缺血性卒中发作后4.5至24小时内静脉注射0.25 mg/kg的TNK与标准治疗或安慰剂。90天的主要结局是良好的功能结局(改进的Rankin量表评分,0-1),还有额外的疗效和安全性终点。随机效应荟萃分析在总体和预先定义的亚组中进行,根据是否允许EVT在个别研究中分层(非EVT与EVT允许)。结果:纳入4项多中心随机对照试验,纳入1278例患者。与对照组相比,TNK显著增加了90天的优秀功能结局(优势比[OR], 1.34 [95% CI, 1.06-1.71]; P=0.02)和再通(OR, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.59-6.84]; P=0.001),而良好的功能结局(改良Rankin量表评分,0-2)、再灌注和早期神经系统改善无显著差异。对596例非evt亚组患者的亚组分析显示,TNK显著改善了极好的功能结局(OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.02-2.08]; P=0.04)、良好的功能结局(OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.07-2.09]; P=0.02)、再通(OR, 6.17 [95% CI, 3.36-11.33]; PPP=0.003)。无论是总体分析还是亚组分析,TNK组和对照组在症状性脑出血或90天死亡率的风险方面均未观察到显著差异。结论:在4.5 - 24小时内治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者中,TNK改善了良好的功能结局和再通,没有增加症状性脑出血或死亡的风险。值得注意的是,当EVT无法到达时,扩展窗口TNK提供了更大的额外益处,在资源有限的情况下确立了其作为替代再灌注策略的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信