'The Doctor Made Clear His Utter Contempt of Me, and I Can Remember It Still': Unmarried Women's Experiences of Accessing the Pill in Scotland c. 1968-1980.

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Social History of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/shm/hkae060
Kristin Hay
{"title":"'The Doctor Made Clear His Utter Contempt of Me, and I Can Remember It Still': Unmarried Women's Experiences of Accessing the Pill in Scotland <i>c.</i> 1968-1980.","authors":"Kristin Hay","doi":"10.1093/shm/hkae060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1968, the barrier of marital status was removed from oral contraception. This meant that for the first time, unmarried women could legally access contraception for both social and medical reasons. As a biomedical drug, the pill required women to engage more frequently with the medical profession, purportedly redefining the patient-practitioner dynamic. However, despite the removal of legislative barriers to family planning services, societal attitudes towards the use of the pill by unmarried women continued to regulate individual behaviours and restrict their contraceptive choices. This was heightened in Scotland, which lagged behind the rest of mainland Britain in implementing family planning services. Using oral testimony, coupled with archival evidence, this article traces the implementation of family planning services by the Scottish state. It then examines unmarried women's early experiences of accessing the pill, and the impact of societal attitudes, gender inequalities and medical hostilities on their reproductive autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21922,"journal":{"name":"Social History of Medicine","volume":"38 3","pages":"647-669"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkae060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1968, the barrier of marital status was removed from oral contraception. This meant that for the first time, unmarried women could legally access contraception for both social and medical reasons. As a biomedical drug, the pill required women to engage more frequently with the medical profession, purportedly redefining the patient-practitioner dynamic. However, despite the removal of legislative barriers to family planning services, societal attitudes towards the use of the pill by unmarried women continued to regulate individual behaviours and restrict their contraceptive choices. This was heightened in Scotland, which lagged behind the rest of mainland Britain in implementing family planning services. Using oral testimony, coupled with archival evidence, this article traces the implementation of family planning services by the Scottish state. It then examines unmarried women's early experiences of accessing the pill, and the impact of societal attitudes, gender inequalities and medical hostilities on their reproductive autonomy.

“医生明确表达了他对我的蔑视,我至今还记得”:1968-1980年苏格兰未婚女性获取避孕药的经历。
1968年,婚姻状况的障碍从口服避孕药中消失了。这意味着,未婚妇女第一次可以出于社会和医疗原因合法地获得避孕措施。作为一种生物医学药物,避孕药要求女性更频繁地接触医疗行业,据称这重新定义了患者与医生之间的动态关系。然而,尽管计划生育服务的立法障碍已经消除,但社会对未婚妇女使用避孕药的态度继续制约着她们的个人行为和避孕选择。这种情况在苏格兰尤为突出,苏格兰在实施计划生育服务方面落后于英国大陆的其他地区。本文利用口头证词,结合档案证据,追溯了苏格兰国家实施计划生育服务的情况。然后调查未婚妇女获得避孕药的早期经历,以及社会态度、性别不平等和医疗敌意对她们生育自主权的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social History of Medicine
Social History of Medicine 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social History of Medicine , the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine, is concerned with all aspects of health, illness, and medical treatment in the past. It is committed to publishing work on the social history of medicine from a variety of disciplines. The journal offers its readers substantive and lively articles on a variety of themes, critical assessments of archives and sources, conference reports, up-to-date information on research in progress, a discussion point on topics of current controversy and concern, review articles, and wide-ranging book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书