Efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: results of a single-centre retrospective study.

IF 2.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI:10.5114/pg.2025.154701
Marcin Bzdyra, Edyta M Tulewicz-Marti, Anna Przepióra, Konrad Lewandowski, Grażyna Rydzewska
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection: results of a single-centre retrospective study.","authors":"Marcin Bzdyra, Edyta M Tulewicz-Marti, Anna Przepióra, Konrad Lewandowski, Grażyna Rydzewska","doi":"10.5114/pg.2025.154701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have indicated the high effectiveness of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in the treatment of recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (rCDI). However, there is still a lack of data from different subpopulations regarding FMT and the factors related to it.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT in rCDI.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In all cases, FMT was performed using a nasoenteric tube. A good response following a single FMT was considered an improvement, whereas requiring more than one FMT was considered a suboptimal response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analysed period, FMT was performed on a total of 98 patients, including 74 with rCDI (of whom 23 received 2 FMTs, 6 received 3 FMTs, and 1 received 5 FMTs). The average age of the patients was 68 years. 42 (56%) patients were women, 41 (55.4%) had previously used antibiotics, 2 (2.7%) had used steroids, and 4 (5.4%) had used proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Following the first FMT procedure, clinical improvement was observed in 44 (59.4%) patients. The odds of a suboptimal effect of the therapy (needing more than 1 FMT) were associated with prior use of metronidazole. Among all analysed factors, cardiovascular risk factors (such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia) were associated with a threefold increased likelihood of requiring more than 1 FMT (<i>p</i> = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, FMT was found to be an effective and safe treatment of recurrent CDI. Use of metronidazole was identified as a risk factor for a suboptimal response to FMT in the studied cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":20719,"journal":{"name":"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny","volume":"20 3","pages":"330-334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12508383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2025.154701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have indicated the high effectiveness of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). However, there is still a lack of data from different subpopulations regarding FMT and the factors related to it.

Aim: The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT in rCDI.

Material and methods: In all cases, FMT was performed using a nasoenteric tube. A good response following a single FMT was considered an improvement, whereas requiring more than one FMT was considered a suboptimal response.

Results: In the analysed period, FMT was performed on a total of 98 patients, including 74 with rCDI (of whom 23 received 2 FMTs, 6 received 3 FMTs, and 1 received 5 FMTs). The average age of the patients was 68 years. 42 (56%) patients were women, 41 (55.4%) had previously used antibiotics, 2 (2.7%) had used steroids, and 4 (5.4%) had used proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Following the first FMT procedure, clinical improvement was observed in 44 (59.4%) patients. The odds of a suboptimal effect of the therapy (needing more than 1 FMT) were associated with prior use of metronidazole. Among all analysed factors, cardiovascular risk factors (such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia) were associated with a threefold increased likelihood of requiring more than 1 FMT (p = 0.038).

Conclusions: In our study, FMT was found to be an effective and safe treatment of recurrent CDI. Use of metronidazole was identified as a risk factor for a suboptimal response to FMT in the studied cohort.

粪便微生物群移植(FMT)治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染的有效性和安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究结果
研究表明,粪便微生物群移植(FMT)治疗复发性难辨梭菌感染(rCDI)具有很高的疗效。然而,仍然缺乏来自不同亚种群的关于FMT及其相关因素的数据。目的:本研究的目的是回顾性评价FMT治疗rCDI的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:所有病例均采用鼻肠管进行FMT。单次FMT后的良好反应被认为是一种改进,而需要一次以上的FMT被认为是次优反应。结果:在分析期内,共对98例患者进行FMT,其中74例为rCDI(其中23例接受2次FMT, 6例接受3次FMT, 1例接受5次FMT)。患者平均年龄为68岁。42例(56%)患者为女性,41例(55.4%)既往使用抗生素,2例(2.7%)使用类固醇,4例(5.4%)使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。在第一次FMT手术后,44例(59.4%)患者的临床改善。治疗效果不理想的几率(需要超过1个FMT)与先前使用甲硝唑有关。在所有分析的因素中,心血管危险因素(如高血压和高脂血症)与需要超过1次FMT的可能性增加三倍相关(p = 0.038)。结论:在我们的研究中,FMT是一种有效且安全的治疗复发性CDI的方法。在研究的队列中,甲硝唑的使用被确定为FMT反应不理想的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Review is a journal published each 2 months, aimed at gastroenterologists and general practitioners. Published under the patronage of Consultant in Gastroenterology and Polish Pancreatic Club.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信