Eye-tracking enables reliable pain assessment in intubated SCI patients and is not associated with self-appraisals.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christina Ingwald, Robert Gaschler, Uwe Hamsen, Aileen Spieckermann, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, Oliver Cruciger, Christian Waydhas, Christopher Ull
{"title":"Eye-tracking enables reliable pain assessment in intubated SCI patients and is not associated with self-appraisals.","authors":"Christina Ingwald, Robert Gaschler, Uwe Hamsen, Aileen Spieckermann, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, Oliver Cruciger, Christian Waydhas, Christopher Ull","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2570118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine whether eye-tracking (ET) enables reliable self-report of pain in intubated patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to explore associations between pain and psychological self-appraisals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, 75 mechanically ventilated ICU patients (46 SCI, 29 non-SCI) completed pain assessments using a Tobii Dynavox ET device. Pain was measured via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the EQ-5D-5L pain dimension. Self-esteem, anxiety, and depression were measured with the Visual Analogue Self-Esteem Scale (VASES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NRS and EQ-5D pain ratings showed strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Pain intensity did not differ significantly between SCI and non-SCI groups. No significant associations were observed between pain and self-esteem, anxiety, or depression. A Bland - Altman plot confirmed agreement between NRS and EQ-5D pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ET enables reliable pain self-report in intubated ICU patients with severely limited communication. Pain ratings were independent of psychological self-appraisals, suggesting ET offers a feasible, patient-centered tool for assessing pain in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2570118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To examine whether eye-tracking (ET) enables reliable self-report of pain in intubated patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to explore associations between pain and psychological self-appraisals.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 75 mechanically ventilated ICU patients (46 SCI, 29 non-SCI) completed pain assessments using a Tobii Dynavox ET device. Pain was measured via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the EQ-5D-5L pain dimension. Self-esteem, anxiety, and depression were measured with the Visual Analogue Self-Esteem Scale (VASES).

Results: NRS and EQ-5D pain ratings showed strong correlation (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). Pain intensity did not differ significantly between SCI and non-SCI groups. No significant associations were observed between pain and self-esteem, anxiety, or depression. A Bland - Altman plot confirmed agreement between NRS and EQ-5D pain scores.

Conclusions: ET enables reliable pain self-report in intubated ICU patients with severely limited communication. Pain ratings were independent of psychological self-appraisals, suggesting ET offers a feasible, patient-centered tool for assessing pain in this population.

眼动追踪能够对插管脊髓损伤患者进行可靠的疼痛评估,并且与自我评估无关。
目的:研究眼动追踪(ET)是否能使脊髓损伤(SCI)插管患者可靠地自我报告疼痛,并探讨疼痛与心理自我评价之间的关系。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,75例机械通气ICU患者(46例SCI, 29例非SCI)使用Tobii Dynavox ET装置完成疼痛评估。疼痛通过数字评定量表(NRS)和EQ-5D-5L疼痛维度进行测量。用视觉模拟自尊量表(VASES)测量自尊、焦虑和抑郁。结果:NRS与EQ-5D疼痛评分存在强相关性(r = 0.78, p)。结论:ET可使沟通严重受限的ICU插管患者进行可靠的疼痛自我报告。疼痛评分独立于心理自我评价,表明ET为评估这一人群的疼痛提供了一个可行的、以患者为中心的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信