Quality assessment from biobank plasma and serum specimens: a systematic review.

IF 2.4 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-10-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.20122
Xiongshun Liang, Wanna Xu, Lin Chen, Xiaoqian Liu, Wenxu Hong, Xuqiao Hu
{"title":"Quality assessment from biobank plasma and serum specimens: a systematic review.","authors":"Xiongshun Liang, Wanna Xu, Lin Chen, Xiaoqian Liu, Wenxu Hong, Xuqiao Hu","doi":"10.7717/peerj.20122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate assessment of serum and plasma quality is essential for reliable biobanking and research. This systematic review synthesizes 46 studies and shows that current evaluation methods prioritize sample processing delays, freeze-thaw cycles, storage duration, and temperature variations, while neglecting preanalytical factors like medication and diet. Temperature critically affected stability: non-refrigerated samples (8-37 °C) showed 3.2 times more biomarker alterations than refrigerated samples after >24 h delays. Freeze-thaw cycles caused dose-dependent instability, with >10 cycles triggering severe degradation (70% altered biomarkers) and universal enzyme impairment. Even ≤5 cycles significantly altered enzymes (43% affected). Enzymes also degraded over time at <-20 °C, with alteration rates rising from 20% (1-5 years) to 55% (>10 years). The analysis consolidates stability data for enzymes, sterols, cytokines, and metabolites across conditions, providing an evidence-based foundation for quality control. Standardizing procedures to address these gaps will enhance sample integrity, research reliability, and clinical utility. Critically, this review underscores that preexisting biobank collections may have inherent limitations, necessitating careful evaluation of sample history when designing studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e20122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate assessment of serum and plasma quality is essential for reliable biobanking and research. This systematic review synthesizes 46 studies and shows that current evaluation methods prioritize sample processing delays, freeze-thaw cycles, storage duration, and temperature variations, while neglecting preanalytical factors like medication and diet. Temperature critically affected stability: non-refrigerated samples (8-37 °C) showed 3.2 times more biomarker alterations than refrigerated samples after >24 h delays. Freeze-thaw cycles caused dose-dependent instability, with >10 cycles triggering severe degradation (70% altered biomarkers) and universal enzyme impairment. Even ≤5 cycles significantly altered enzymes (43% affected). Enzymes also degraded over time at <-20 °C, with alteration rates rising from 20% (1-5 years) to 55% (>10 years). The analysis consolidates stability data for enzymes, sterols, cytokines, and metabolites across conditions, providing an evidence-based foundation for quality control. Standardizing procedures to address these gaps will enhance sample integrity, research reliability, and clinical utility. Critically, this review underscores that preexisting biobank collections may have inherent limitations, necessitating careful evaluation of sample history when designing studies.

生物库血浆和血清标本的质量评估:系统综述。
准确评估血清和血浆质量对于可靠的生物库和研究至关重要。本系统综述综合了46项研究,并表明目前的评估方法优先考虑样品处理延迟、冻融周期、储存时间和温度变化,而忽略了药物和饮食等分析前因素。温度严重影响稳定性:非冷藏样品(8-37°C)在延迟48小时后,生物标志物的变化是冷藏样品的3.2倍。冻融循环引起剂量依赖性不稳定性,bbb10循环引发严重降解(70%的生物标志物改变)和普遍酶损伤。即使≤5个循环也会显著改变酶(43%受影响)。随着时间的推移,酶也会降解(10年)。该分析整合了各种条件下酶、固醇、细胞因子和代谢物的稳定性数据,为质量控制提供了循证基础。标准化的程序,以解决这些差距将提高样本的完整性,研究的可靠性和临床效用。至关重要的是,这篇综述强调了先前存在的生物库收集可能具有固有的局限性,在设计研究时需要仔细评估样本历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信