Transorbital management of selected spheno-orbital meningiomas: Insights from a multicentric retrospective Italian study of 52 cases.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Iacopo Dallan, Simona Serioli, Matteo de Notaris, Ernesto Pasquini, Matteo Zoli, Diego Mazzatenta, Luigi Maria Cavallo, Alberto Arosio, Matteo Barucco, Giacomo Fiacchini, Paolo Castelnuovo, Davide Locatelli
{"title":"Transorbital management of selected spheno-orbital meningiomas: Insights from a multicentric retrospective Italian study of 52 cases.","authors":"Iacopo Dallan, Simona Serioli, Matteo de Notaris, Ernesto Pasquini, Matteo Zoli, Diego Mazzatenta, Luigi Maria Cavallo, Alberto Arosio, Matteo Barucco, Giacomo Fiacchini, Paolo Castelnuovo, Davide Locatelli","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03840-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs) are a rare type of intracranial tumor. Their location and behavior often make radical resection unfeasible. Recently, less invasive techniques have gained traction. The endoscopic transorbital approach (TOA), sometimes combined with lateral orbital rim removal or additional routes, offers a flexible surgical corridor for selected SOMs. This study evaluates the outcomes of TOA in SOM patients across five Italian tertiary centers, focusing on feasibility, safety, symptom relief, and tumor control. A retrospective multicenter study was conducted from January 2012 to December 2022, involving 52 patients treated with TOA. Data on symptoms, functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Proptosis was the most common symptom (94.2%), followed by diplopia (36.5%), visual impairment (34.6%), and blindness (3.8%). Orbital extension occurred in 28.8% of cases, cavernous sinus invasion in 21.2%, and infratemporal/pterygopalatine fossa involvement in 21.2%. Thirty-six patients underwent standard TOA, while 16 required multiportal or staged approaches. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 28.8%, subtotal in 23.1%, and partial in 48.1%. Trigeminal hypoesthesia (9.6%) was the most common complication. Proptosis resolved in 50 patients; however, two developed contralateral proptosis. Visual improvement occurred in 31% of cases. TOA appears feasible and safe for selected SOMs, especially for addressing proptosis. However, extensive tumor spread, large size, or vascular invasion are linked to lower GTR rates. Ideal candidates and formal guidelines are yet to be defined, but TOA represents a promising minimally invasive strategy in appropriate cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03840-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs) are a rare type of intracranial tumor. Their location and behavior often make radical resection unfeasible. Recently, less invasive techniques have gained traction. The endoscopic transorbital approach (TOA), sometimes combined with lateral orbital rim removal or additional routes, offers a flexible surgical corridor for selected SOMs. This study evaluates the outcomes of TOA in SOM patients across five Italian tertiary centers, focusing on feasibility, safety, symptom relief, and tumor control. A retrospective multicenter study was conducted from January 2012 to December 2022, involving 52 patients treated with TOA. Data on symptoms, functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Proptosis was the most common symptom (94.2%), followed by diplopia (36.5%), visual impairment (34.6%), and blindness (3.8%). Orbital extension occurred in 28.8% of cases, cavernous sinus invasion in 21.2%, and infratemporal/pterygopalatine fossa involvement in 21.2%. Thirty-six patients underwent standard TOA, while 16 required multiportal or staged approaches. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 28.8%, subtotal in 23.1%, and partial in 48.1%. Trigeminal hypoesthesia (9.6%) was the most common complication. Proptosis resolved in 50 patients; however, two developed contralateral proptosis. Visual improvement occurred in 31% of cases. TOA appears feasible and safe for selected SOMs, especially for addressing proptosis. However, extensive tumor spread, large size, or vascular invasion are linked to lower GTR rates. Ideal candidates and formal guidelines are yet to be defined, but TOA represents a promising minimally invasive strategy in appropriate cases.

经眼眶治疗选择性蝶眶脑膜瘤:来自意大利52例多中心回顾性研究的见解。
摘要蝶眶脑膜瘤是一种罕见的颅内肿瘤。它们的位置和行为往往使根治性切除不可行。最近,微创技术获得了关注。内镜下经眶入路(TOA),有时结合外侧眶缘切除或其他途径,为选定的SOMs提供了灵活的手术通道。本研究评估了意大利五个三级中心的SOM患者TOA的结果,重点是可行性、安全性、症状缓解和肿瘤控制。2012年1月至2022年12月进行了一项回顾性多中心研究,涉及52例接受TOA治疗的患者。对症状、功能结局和并发症的数据进行分析。最常见的症状是眼球突出(94.2%),其次是复视(36.5%)、视力障碍(34.6%)和失明(3.8%)。眼眶扩张占28.8%,海绵窦侵犯占21.2%,颞下窝/翼腭窝受累占21.2%。36例患者行标准TOA, 16例患者行多门或分期入路。总切除率为28.8%,小切除率为23.1%,部分切除率为48.1%。三叉神经感觉减退(9.6%)是最常见的并发症。50例患者脊柱突出消退;然而,2例发生对侧突出。31%的病例出现视力改善。对于选定的SOMs,特别是寻址预测,TOA似乎是可行和安全的。然而,肿瘤广泛扩散、体积大或血管侵犯与较低的GTR率有关。理想的候选者和正式的指导方针尚未确定,但在适当的情况下,TOA代表了一种有前途的微创策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信