The Influence of Preoperative Central Sensitization on the Postoperative Prognosis of Pilon Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S542473
Jiachen Liang, Qiang Zan, Shihang Cao, Hongze Wang, Geng Liu, Weijie Yang, Shaokang Zhang, Yi Li, Junkui Xu
{"title":"The Influence of Preoperative Central Sensitization on the Postoperative Prognosis of Pilon Fractures: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Jiachen Liang, Qiang Zan, Shihang Cao, Hongze Wang, Geng Liu, Weijie Yang, Shaokang Zhang, Yi Li, Junkui Xu","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S542473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although surgical techniques have improved, chronic pain, functional impairment and psychological effects still occur after pilon fracture surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy after pilon fracture surgery and to explore the impact of preoperative patients with central sensitization (Central Sensitization, CS) on the improvement of postoperative pain, function, anxiety/depression.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study, we collected adult (≥18 years old) patients with pilon fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation at Xi'an Honghui Hospital from January 2020 to July 2024 and had the cognitive ability to complete the questionnaire. Exclusion criteria included incomplete medical records, concurrent other foot fractures, or severe mental disorders. The preoperative central sensitization (CS) determination criteria were a score of ≥18 on the Chinese version of the 9-item Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-9). The assessment indicators at baseline and the last follow-up included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Patients were divided into the CS group and the non-CS group based on whether they had a preoperative central sensitization state, and the differences in baseline characteristics, pain severity, functional performance, and psychological state between the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the final follow-up, the performance of the CS group was worse than that of the non-CS group, VAS was 20.04±6.87 compared to 14.15±6.34 (P < 0.001); AOFAS was 77.71±9.55 compared to 86.21±6.57 (P < 0.001); HADS-A was 6.39±2.87 compared to 3.00 (2.00, 4.00); HADS-D was 6.39±3.06 compared to 3.00 (2.00, 3.00). In terms of improvement degree, there were significant differences between the two groups in the improvement of pain and anxiety/depression (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups of patients showed significant improvement in pain relief, functional activity, and psychological state postoperatively compared to preoperatively. However, patients with preoperative CS showed less improvement in pain relief, functional recovery, and psychological state compared to those without CS. Therefore, foot and ankle surgeons should further investigate the impact of preoperative interventions for CS on postoperative outcomes in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"5191-5201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S542473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although surgical techniques have improved, chronic pain, functional impairment and psychological effects still occur after pilon fracture surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy after pilon fracture surgery and to explore the impact of preoperative patients with central sensitization (Central Sensitization, CS) on the improvement of postoperative pain, function, anxiety/depression.

Patients and methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we collected adult (≥18 years old) patients with pilon fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation at Xi'an Honghui Hospital from January 2020 to July 2024 and had the cognitive ability to complete the questionnaire. Exclusion criteria included incomplete medical records, concurrent other foot fractures, or severe mental disorders. The preoperative central sensitization (CS) determination criteria were a score of ≥18 on the Chinese version of the 9-item Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-9). The assessment indicators at baseline and the last follow-up included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Patients were divided into the CS group and the non-CS group based on whether they had a preoperative central sensitization state, and the differences in baseline characteristics, pain severity, functional performance, and psychological state between the two groups were compared.

Results: At the final follow-up, the performance of the CS group was worse than that of the non-CS group, VAS was 20.04±6.87 compared to 14.15±6.34 (P < 0.001); AOFAS was 77.71±9.55 compared to 86.21±6.57 (P < 0.001); HADS-A was 6.39±2.87 compared to 3.00 (2.00, 4.00); HADS-D was 6.39±3.06 compared to 3.00 (2.00, 3.00). In terms of improvement degree, there were significant differences between the two groups in the improvement of pain and anxiety/depression (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Both groups of patients showed significant improvement in pain relief, functional activity, and psychological state postoperatively compared to preoperatively. However, patients with preoperative CS showed less improvement in pain relief, functional recovery, and psychological state compared to those without CS. Therefore, foot and ankle surgeons should further investigate the impact of preoperative interventions for CS on postoperative outcomes in future studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

术前中枢致敏对皮隆骨折术后预后影响的回顾性研究。
目的:虽然手术技术有所提高,但枕部骨折术后仍存在慢性疼痛、功能损害和心理影响。本研究旨在评价皮隆骨折手术后的临床疗效,探讨术前中枢性致敏(central sensitization, CS)对患者术后疼痛、功能、焦虑/抑郁改善的影响。患者和方法:在本单中心回顾性研究中,我们收集了2020年1月至2024年7月在西安宏辉医院行切开复位内固定的成人(≥18岁)枕部骨折患者,这些患者具有完成问卷的认知能力。排除标准包括不完整的医疗记录、并发的其他足部骨折或严重的精神障碍。术前中枢致敏(CS)判定标准为中文版9项中心致敏量表(CSI-9)得分≥18分。基线和末次随访时的评估指标包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、美国骨科足踝学会后足评分(AOFAS)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。根据患者术前是否有中枢致敏状态分为CS组和非CS组,比较两组患者基线特征、疼痛严重程度、功能表现、心理状态的差异。结果:末次随访时,CS组表现较非CS组差,VAS为20.04±6.87比14.15±6.34 (P < 0.001);AOFAS分别为77.71±9.55和86.21±6.57 (P < 0.001);HADS-A为6.39±2.87比3.00 (2.00,4.00);HADS-D分别为6.39±3.06和3.00(2.00,3.00)。在改善程度上,两组在疼痛和焦虑/抑郁的改善程度上差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:两组患者术后疼痛缓解、功能活动、心理状态均较术前有明显改善。然而,术前CS患者在疼痛缓解、功能恢复和心理状态方面的改善程度较无CS患者低。因此,在未来的研究中,足踝外科医生应进一步研究CS术前干预对术后预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信