A Comparison of Different Radiomics Methods Predicting Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Yan Deng, Linlin Zheng, Min Zhang, Lilong Xu, Qiang Li, Ling Zhou, Qian Wang, Yuejiang Gong, Shiyan Li
{"title":"A Comparison of Different Radiomics Methods Predicting Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.","authors":"Yan Deng, Linlin Zheng, Min Zhang, Lilong Xu, Qiang Li, Ling Zhou, Qian Wang, Yuejiang Gong, Shiyan Li","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The preoperative identification of cervical lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma is essential in tailoring surgical treatment. We aim to develop an ultrasound-based handcrafted radiomics model, a deep learning radiomics model, and a combined model for better predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 441 patients was included (308 in the training set, 133 in the testing set). Handcrafted radiomics features, manually selected by physicians, were extracted using Pyradiomics software, whereas deep learning radiomics features were extracted from a pretrained DenseNet121 network, a fully automatic process that eliminates the need for manual selection. A combined model integrating radiomics signatures from the above models was developed. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the performance of three models. DeLong's tests were conducted to compare the AUC values of the different models in the training and testing sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training set, the AUC value of the combined model (0.790) was significantly higher than that of the handcrafted radiomics (0.743, p = 0.021) and deep learning radiomics (0.730, p = 0.003) models. In the testing set, although the AUC value of the combined model (0.761) was higher than that of the handcrafted radiomics model (0.734, p = 0.368) and deep learning radiomics model (0.719, p = 0.228), statistical significance was not reached. The handcrafted radiomics model exhibited high accuracy in both the training and testing sets (0.714 and 0.707), while the deep learning radiomics model showed accuracy below 0.7 in both the training and testing sets (0.698 and 0.662).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined model based on conventional ultrasound images enhances the predictive performance compared to different radiomics models alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The preoperative identification of cervical lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma is essential in tailoring surgical treatment. We aim to develop an ultrasound-based handcrafted radiomics model, a deep learning radiomics model, and a combined model for better predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 441 patients was included (308 in the training set, 133 in the testing set). Handcrafted radiomics features, manually selected by physicians, were extracted using Pyradiomics software, whereas deep learning radiomics features were extracted from a pretrained DenseNet121 network, a fully automatic process that eliminates the need for manual selection. A combined model integrating radiomics signatures from the above models was developed. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the performance of three models. DeLong's tests were conducted to compare the AUC values of the different models in the training and testing sets.

Results: In the training set, the AUC value of the combined model (0.790) was significantly higher than that of the handcrafted radiomics (0.743, p = 0.021) and deep learning radiomics (0.730, p = 0.003) models. In the testing set, although the AUC value of the combined model (0.761) was higher than that of the handcrafted radiomics model (0.734, p = 0.368) and deep learning radiomics model (0.719, p = 0.228), statistical significance was not reached. The handcrafted radiomics model exhibited high accuracy in both the training and testing sets (0.714 and 0.707), while the deep learning radiomics model showed accuracy below 0.7 in both the training and testing sets (0.698 and 0.662).

Conclusions: The combined model based on conventional ultrasound images enhances the predictive performance compared to different radiomics models alone.

不同放射组学方法预测甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移的比较。
目的:术前鉴别甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移对手术治疗有重要意义。我们的目标是建立基于超声的手工放射组学模型、深度学习放射组学模型和联合模型,以更好地预测乳头状甲状腺癌患者的颈部淋巴结转移。方法:对441例患者进行回顾性队列研究,其中训练组308例,测试组133例。手工制作的放射组学特征,由医生手动选择,使用Pyradiomics软件提取,而深度学习放射组学特征从预训练的DenseNet121网络中提取,这是一个完全自动化的过程,无需手动选择。开发了一个综合上述模型的放射组学特征的组合模型。采用ROC分析对三种模型的性能进行评价。进行DeLong的测试,比较不同模型在训练集和测试集的AUC值。结果:在训练集中,组合模型的AUC值(0.790)显著高于手工放射组学模型(0.743,p = 0.021)和深度学习放射组学模型(0.730,p = 0.003)。在测试集中,虽然组合模型的AUC值(0.761)高于手工制作放射组学模型(0.734,p = 0.368)和深度学习放射组学模型(0.719,p = 0.228),但没有达到统计学意义。手工制作的放射组学模型在训练集和测试集上的准确率都很高(0.714和0.707),而深度学习的放射组学模型在训练集和测试集上的准确率都低于0.7(0.698和0.662)。结论:与单独使用不同放射组学模型相比,基于常规超声图像的联合模型的预测效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信