A Retrospective Database Analysis of Anticholinergic Burden Among Older Patients With and Without Overactive Bladder in South Korea.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Neurourology Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.5213/inj.2550112.056
Kyu-Sung Lee, Juhee Cho, Danbee Kang, Kwang Jin Ko, Chee Yoong Foo, Matthias Stoelzel, Farid Abdul Hadi, Soyoung Kim
{"title":"A Retrospective Database Analysis of Anticholinergic Burden Among Older Patients With and Without Overactive Bladder in South Korea.","authors":"Kyu-Sung Lee, Juhee Cho, Danbee Kang, Kwang Jin Ko, Chee Yoong Foo, Matthias Stoelzel, Farid Abdul Hadi, Soyoung Kim","doi":"10.5213/inj.2550112.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to measure the cumulative anticholinergic burden in older outpatients in South Korea with and without newly started overactive bladder (OAB) medications, and to assess the contribution OAB treatment-related antimuscarinics have on overall anticholinergic exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study utilizing the South Korean National Health Insurance Service database included patients ≥65 years old with ≥1 outpatient visit (any cause) between January 1 and June 30, 2016. The overall cohort included patients with OAB and matched patients without OAB. Outcomes were assessed over a 100-day follow-up period. Primary endpoints were 100-day cumulative anticholinergic cognitive burden score, prevalence of anticholinergic and strong anticholinergic use, and number of anticholinergics per patient. Proportion of anticholinergic cognitive burden score attributable to OAB medication was a secondary endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study cohort included 2,360 patients with OAB and 11,676 patients without OAB. Mean 100-day cumulative anticholinergic cognitive burden score was 15.2 times higher for OAB (320.1) than non-OAB (21.0). Anticholinergics were used widely for OAB patients (2,287 [96.9%] vs. 3,921 [33.6%] non-OAB patients). Prevalence of strong anticholinergic use was almost 4 times higher for OAB (2,234 patients [94.7%]) compared with non-OAB (2,817 patients [24.1%]). On average, 0.9 anticholinergics were dispensed per patient. Anticholinergic cognitive burden score attributable to OAB medications was 66.9% in the antimuscarinic-only group, 64.3% in the antimuscarinic with mirabegron group, and 0% in the mirabegron-only group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with OAB, 100-day cumulative anticholinergic cognitive burden score was 15 times higher than in patients without OAB, due to anticholinergic medications. In this study, mirabegron did not contribute to anticholinergic burden. As there are unwanted effects associated with this burden, clinicians should consider the anticholinergic burden of each patient when using pharmacotherapy to treat OAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":14466,"journal":{"name":"International Neurourology Journal","volume":"29 3","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12516136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Neurourology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2550112.056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to measure the cumulative anticholinergic burden in older outpatients in South Korea with and without newly started overactive bladder (OAB) medications, and to assess the contribution OAB treatment-related antimuscarinics have on overall anticholinergic exposure.

Methods: This retrospective study utilizing the South Korean National Health Insurance Service database included patients ≥65 years old with ≥1 outpatient visit (any cause) between January 1 and June 30, 2016. The overall cohort included patients with OAB and matched patients without OAB. Outcomes were assessed over a 100-day follow-up period. Primary endpoints were 100-day cumulative anticholinergic cognitive burden score, prevalence of anticholinergic and strong anticholinergic use, and number of anticholinergics per patient. Proportion of anticholinergic cognitive burden score attributable to OAB medication was a secondary endpoint.

Results: The final study cohort included 2,360 patients with OAB and 11,676 patients without OAB. Mean 100-day cumulative anticholinergic cognitive burden score was 15.2 times higher for OAB (320.1) than non-OAB (21.0). Anticholinergics were used widely for OAB patients (2,287 [96.9%] vs. 3,921 [33.6%] non-OAB patients). Prevalence of strong anticholinergic use was almost 4 times higher for OAB (2,234 patients [94.7%]) compared with non-OAB (2,817 patients [24.1%]). On average, 0.9 anticholinergics were dispensed per patient. Anticholinergic cognitive burden score attributable to OAB medications was 66.9% in the antimuscarinic-only group, 64.3% in the antimuscarinic with mirabegron group, and 0% in the mirabegron-only group.

Conclusion: In patients with OAB, 100-day cumulative anticholinergic cognitive burden score was 15 times higher than in patients without OAB, due to anticholinergic medications. In this study, mirabegron did not contribute to anticholinergic burden. As there are unwanted effects associated with this burden, clinicians should consider the anticholinergic burden of each patient when using pharmacotherapy to treat OAB.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

韩国老年膀胱过度活动患者抗胆碱能负荷的回顾性数据库分析
目的:本研究旨在测量韩国老年门诊患者的累积抗胆碱能负担,这些患者有和没有新开始的膀胱过动症(OAB)药物治疗,并评估与OAB治疗相关的抗蛇毒素对总体抗胆碱能暴露的贡献。方法:本回顾性研究利用韩国国民健康保险服务数据库,纳入2016年1月1日至6月30日期间≥65岁门诊≥1次(任何原因)的患者。整个队列包括OAB患者和匹配的无OAB患者。结果在100天的随访期间进行评估。主要终点是100天累积抗胆碱能认知负担评分,抗胆碱能和强抗胆碱能使用的患病率,以及每位患者的抗胆碱能药物数量。OAB药物引起的抗胆碱能认知负担评分比例是次要终点。结果:最终的研究队列包括2360例OAB患者和11676例无OAB患者。平均100天累积抗胆碱能认知负担评分OAB组(320.1)比非OAB组(21.0)高15.2倍。抗胆碱能药物广泛用于OAB患者(2,287例[96.9%]对3,921例[33.6%]非OAB患者)。OAB患者(2234例[94.7%])比非OAB患者(2817例[24.1%])使用强抗胆碱能药物的患病率几乎高4倍。平均每位患者使用0.9种抗胆碱能药物。抗毒蕈碱单用组的抗胆碱能认知负担评分为66.9%,抗毒蕈碱联合米拉贝龙组为64.3%,米拉贝龙单用组为0%。结论:OAB患者100天累积抗胆碱能认知负担评分比无OAB患者高15倍,主要原因是抗胆碱能药物的作用。在本研究中,mirabegron没有增加抗胆碱能负荷。由于存在与这种负担相关的不良反应,临床医生在使用药物治疗OAB时应考虑每位患者的抗胆碱能负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Neurourology Journal
International Neurourology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
41
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Neurourology Journal (Int Neurourol J, INJ) is a quarterly international journal that publishes high-quality research papers that provide the most significant and promising achievements in the fields of clinical neurourology and fundamental science. Specifically, fundamental science includes the most influential research papers from all fields of science and technology, revolutionizing what physicians and researchers practicing the art of neurourology worldwide know. Thus, we welcome valuable basic research articles to introduce cutting-edge translational research of fundamental sciences to clinical neurourology. In the editorials, urologists will present their perspectives on these articles. The original mission statement of the INJ was published on October 12, 1997. INJ provides authors a fast review of their work and makes a decision in an average of three to four weeks of receiving submissions. If accepted, articles are posted online in fully citable form. Supplementary issues will be published interim to quarterlies, as necessary, to fully allow berth to accept and publish relevant articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书