Performance of Children with and without Auditory Processing Disorders in Adaptive Temporal Gap Detection Measures.

IF 1.1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1804517
Chandni Jain, Kishore Tanniru, Gayathri Kalarikkal
{"title":"Performance of Children with and without Auditory Processing Disorders in Adaptive Temporal Gap Detection Measures.","authors":"Chandni Jain, Kishore Tanniru, Gayathri Kalarikkal","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1804517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Children with auditory processing disorder (APD) exhibit various auditory processing deficits, including temporal processing deficits. Temporal processing abilities are assessed by estimating the gap detection threshold (GDT) as the lowest perceivable gap duration identified by the subject.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study attempted to examine the performance of normal-hearing children and children with APD using adaptive within-channel and across-channel gap detection tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups of children aged between 10 and 12 years participated in the study. Group 1 included children diagnosed with APD, and group 2 included normal hearing, typically developing children (TD), with 12 participants in each group. For each subject, the lowest detectable gap duration was obtained monoaurally, using broadband noise (BBN), within-channel (narrow bands of noise centered spectrally at 2 kHz on either side of the gap), and across-channel (narrow bands of noise leading marker spectrally centered at 2 kHz and trailer marker spectrally centered at 1 kHz) gap detection tests through the Psycon platform (free).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the statistical analysis revealed significant group differences only in across-channel GDT measures between the two groups. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of either within-channel GDT or BBN GDT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that, compared to other stimuli, an across-channel gap detection test would be a better diagnostic test of temporal resolution to identify and assess children with APD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"29 4","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1804517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Children with auditory processing disorder (APD) exhibit various auditory processing deficits, including temporal processing deficits. Temporal processing abilities are assessed by estimating the gap detection threshold (GDT) as the lowest perceivable gap duration identified by the subject.

Objective: The present study attempted to examine the performance of normal-hearing children and children with APD using adaptive within-channel and across-channel gap detection tests.

Methods: Two groups of children aged between 10 and 12 years participated in the study. Group 1 included children diagnosed with APD, and group 2 included normal hearing, typically developing children (TD), with 12 participants in each group. For each subject, the lowest detectable gap duration was obtained monoaurally, using broadband noise (BBN), within-channel (narrow bands of noise centered spectrally at 2 kHz on either side of the gap), and across-channel (narrow bands of noise leading marker spectrally centered at 2 kHz and trailer marker spectrally centered at 1 kHz) gap detection tests through the Psycon platform (free).

Results: The results of the statistical analysis revealed significant group differences only in across-channel GDT measures between the two groups. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of either within-channel GDT or BBN GDT.

Conclusion: The results indicate that, compared to other stimuli, an across-channel gap detection test would be a better diagnostic test of temporal resolution to identify and assess children with APD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

听觉加工障碍儿童与非听觉加工障碍儿童在适应性时间间隙检测中的表现。
儿童听觉加工障碍(APD)表现出各种听觉加工缺陷,包括时间加工缺陷。时间加工能力是通过估计被试识别的最低可感知间隙持续时间的间隙检测阈值来评估的。目的:本研究采用自适应通道内和跨通道间隙检测方法检测正常听力儿童和APD儿童的听力表现。方法:选取两组年龄在10 ~ 12岁的儿童进行研究。第1组包括诊断为APD的儿童,第2组包括听力正常的典型发育儿童(TD),每组12名参与者。对于每个受试者,通过Psycon平台(免费)使用宽带噪声(BBN)、通道内(间隔两侧以2 kHz为中心的窄频带噪声)和跨通道(以2 kHz为中心的窄频带噪声领先标记和以1 kHz为中心的拖尾标记)进行间隔检测测试,以单耳方式获得最低可检测间隙持续时间。结果:统计分析结果显示,两组间仅在跨通道GDT测量上存在显著组间差异。相比之下,在通道内GDT或BBN GDT方面,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:与其他刺激物相比,跨通道间隙检测是一种更好的时间分辨诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书