Re-validation of the Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory-revised among Chinese university students majoring in vocal music.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1667404
Li Pan, Qihuan Chen, Lan Lou, Qizhen Gu, Huiqin Luo, Ping Li, Yannan Liu
{"title":"Re-validation of the Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory-revised among Chinese university students majoring in vocal music.","authors":"Li Pan, Qihuan Chen, Lan Lou, Qizhen Gu, Huiqin Luo, Ping Li, Yannan Liu","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1667404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to its significant impact on performers' psychological well-being and career development, music performance anxiety (MPA) has recently received growing public attention. The Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory-Revised (K-MPAI-R) is one of the most widely focused MPA scales, often used to assess the manifestations and influencing factors of MPA in musicians across different genres and professional stages. However, most current K-MPAI-R validation studies did not distinguish between vocal and instrumental performers. As they differ significantly in performance settings and stressors, these variations may impact the validity of the scale and lead to biased results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With Kenny's permission, this study aims to re-examine the reliability and validity of the K-MPAI-R in the context of Chinese university students majoring in vocal music. 736 Chinese students participated in this study. The researchers divided the total sample into two equal subsamples, each consisting of 368 students. One subsample was subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the other to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through EFA, the researchers obtained a four-factor model (F1: Psychological Vulnerability, F2: Proximal Somatic and Cognitive Anxiety, F3: Parental Support, F4: Memory Self-Efficacy); subsequently, CFA was employed to confirm that the model demonstrated a good fit and exhibited adequate reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study represents the first refined validation of the K-MPAI-R scale for Chinese university students majoring in vocal music, providing cross-cultural and discipline-specific evidence for optimizing measurement tools to assess MPA among vocal performers accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1667404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1667404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to its significant impact on performers' psychological well-being and career development, music performance anxiety (MPA) has recently received growing public attention. The Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory-Revised (K-MPAI-R) is one of the most widely focused MPA scales, often used to assess the manifestations and influencing factors of MPA in musicians across different genres and professional stages. However, most current K-MPAI-R validation studies did not distinguish between vocal and instrumental performers. As they differ significantly in performance settings and stressors, these variations may impact the validity of the scale and lead to biased results.

Methods: With Kenny's permission, this study aims to re-examine the reliability and validity of the K-MPAI-R in the context of Chinese university students majoring in vocal music. 736 Chinese students participated in this study. The researchers divided the total sample into two equal subsamples, each consisting of 368 students. One subsample was subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the other to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results: Through EFA, the researchers obtained a four-factor model (F1: Psychological Vulnerability, F2: Proximal Somatic and Cognitive Anxiety, F3: Parental Support, F4: Memory Self-Efficacy); subsequently, CFA was employed to confirm that the model demonstrated a good fit and exhibited adequate reliability and validity.

Discussion: This study represents the first refined validation of the K-MPAI-R scale for Chinese university students majoring in vocal music, providing cross-cultural and discipline-specific evidence for optimizing measurement tools to assess MPA among vocal performers accurately.

肯尼音乐表演焦虑量表在声乐专业大学生中的再验证。
音乐表演焦虑(MPA)由于对演奏者的心理健康和职业发展有着重要的影响,近年来越来越受到人们的关注。肯尼音乐表演焦虑量表修订版(K-MPAI-R)是目前关注最广泛的MPA量表之一,常用于评估不同流派、不同职业阶段音乐家的MPA表现及其影响因素。然而,目前大多数K-MPAI-R验证研究没有区分声乐和器乐表演者。由于他们在表现设置和压力源方面存在显著差异,这些差异可能会影响量表的有效性并导致有偏差的结果。方法:经Kenny同意,本研究旨在重新检验K-MPAI-R在中国声乐专业大学生中的信度和效度。736名中国学生参与了这项研究。研究人员将整个样本分成两个相等的子样本,每个子样本由368名学生组成。一个子样本进行探索性因子分析(EFA),另一个子样本进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。结果:通过EFA得到了一个四因素模型(F1:心理脆弱性,F2:近端躯体和认知焦虑,F3:父母支持,F4:记忆自我效能);随后,采用CFA验证模型拟合良好,具有足够的信度和效度。讨论:本研究首次对中国声乐专业大学生的K-MPAI-R量表进行了细化验证,为优化测量工具以准确评估声乐表演者的MPA提供了跨文化和学科的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信