Shared decision-making among older adults with multimorbidity in Kerala's primary care: a qualitative study using the socio-ecological model.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1665368
Abhijith A Kumar, Asha Kamath, Lena Ashok, Veena Ganesh Kamath, Varalakshmi Chandra Sekaran
{"title":"Shared decision-making among older adults with multimorbidity in Kerala's primary care: a qualitative study using the socio-ecological model.","authors":"Abhijith A Kumar, Asha Kamath, Lena Ashok, Veena Ganesh Kamath, Varalakshmi Chandra Sekaran","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1665368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multimorbidity is an increasing public health challenge among older adults, particularly in Kerala, India. Shared decision-making (SDM) is central to person-centered care for this group, yet its implementation remains inconsistent in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study explored the experiences and perspectives of older adults with multimorbidity regarding SDM in Kerala's primary care. Sixteen adults (aged 60+) were recruited from four primary health centers using purposive sampling. The Socio-Ecological Model guided the design and thematic analysis, examining SDM influences at individual, interpersonal, organizational, and sociocultural levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings revealed that individual barriers, such as limited health literacy and low self-efficacy, led to passive participation. Family members played a central role in healthcare interactions, sometimes facilitating but occasionally overshadowing patient voices. Organizational barriers, including high patient load and time constraints, limited SDM, while positive provider communication and continuity enabled engagement. Sociocultural factors included strong respect for medical authority and pluralistic health-seeking, with patients often reluctant to disclose alternative treatments to allopathic doctors. Exclusion from SDM was linked to dissatisfaction and poor adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing these barriers and leveraging enablers will require coordinated efforts in communication, health literacy, family engagement, and culturally sensitive practice to advance person-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1665368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1665368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multimorbidity is an increasing public health challenge among older adults, particularly in Kerala, India. Shared decision-making (SDM) is central to person-centered care for this group, yet its implementation remains inconsistent in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: This qualitative study explored the experiences and perspectives of older adults with multimorbidity regarding SDM in Kerala's primary care. Sixteen adults (aged 60+) were recruited from four primary health centers using purposive sampling. The Socio-Ecological Model guided the design and thematic analysis, examining SDM influences at individual, interpersonal, organizational, and sociocultural levels.

Results: Key findings revealed that individual barriers, such as limited health literacy and low self-efficacy, led to passive participation. Family members played a central role in healthcare interactions, sometimes facilitating but occasionally overshadowing patient voices. Organizational barriers, including high patient load and time constraints, limited SDM, while positive provider communication and continuity enabled engagement. Sociocultural factors included strong respect for medical authority and pluralistic health-seeking, with patients often reluctant to disclose alternative treatments to allopathic doctors. Exclusion from SDM was linked to dissatisfaction and poor adherence.

Conclusion: Addressing these barriers and leveraging enablers will require coordinated efforts in communication, health literacy, family engagement, and culturally sensitive practice to advance person-centered care.

在喀拉拉邦的初级保健中,患有多种疾病的老年人共同决策:一项使用社会生态模型的定性研究。
多病是老年人日益严重的公共卫生挑战,特别是在印度喀拉拉邦。共同决策(SDM)是这一群体以人为本的护理的核心,但其实施在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)仍不一致。方法:本定性研究探讨了喀拉拉邦初级保健中患有多种疾病的老年人对SDM的经验和观点。采用目的抽样从四个初级卫生中心招募了16名成年人(60岁以上)。社会生态模型指导了设计和主题分析,检查了SDM在个人、人际、组织和社会文化层面的影响。结果:主要发现个人障碍,如有限的健康素养和低自我效能感,导致被动参与。家庭成员在医疗保健互动中发挥着核心作用,有时会促进,但偶尔会掩盖病人的声音。组织障碍,包括高病人负荷和时间限制,有限的SDM,而积极的提供者沟通和连续性使参与。社会文化因素包括对医疗权威的强烈尊重和多元化的健康寻求,患者通常不愿向对抗疗法医生透露替代疗法。被排除在SDM之外与不满意和依从性差有关。结论:解决这些障碍和利用使能因素需要在沟通、卫生素养、家庭参与和文化敏感实践方面进行协调努力,以推进以人为本的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信