Microbiota-based interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review of efficacy and clinical potential.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1648118
Hana Taha, Ahmad Issa, Zaid Muhanna, Majdi Al-Shehab, Tuleen Wadi, Suhib Awamleh, Yousef A Ateiwi, Mohammad Abusido, Vanja Berggren
{"title":"Microbiota-based interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review of efficacy and clinical potential.","authors":"Hana Taha, Ahmad Issa, Zaid Muhanna, Majdi Al-Shehab, Tuleen Wadi, Suhib Awamleh, Yousef A Ateiwi, Mohammad Abusido, Vanja Berggren","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1648118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is increasingly linked to gut microbiota imbalances, influencing both behavioral and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This systematic review assesses the efficacy of microbiota-based interventions, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), in improving ASD-related symptoms, aiming to provide insights into their therapeutic potential and inform future clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024615043). A structured literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized trials (NRTs), and retrospective studies assessing the impact of microbiota-based interventions on ASD-related behavioral and GI outcomes. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using standardized risk-of-bias tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 studies were included, consisting of 16 RCTs, 14 NRTs, and 3 retrospective studies. Among them, 15 assessed probiotics, 4 prebiotics, 5 synbiotics, and 9 FMT. Probiotics showed moderate behavioral improvements in ASD, with multi-strain formulations being more effective than single strains. Prebiotics and synbiotics yielded mixed results, with some studies indicating benefits in behavioral and GI symptoms. FMT demonstrated the most consistent and sustained improvements in both ASD-related behaviors and GI function. Adverse events were minimal, primarily involving transient GI symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microbiota-targeted interventions, particularly FMT, hold promise for managing ASD symptoms, though probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics present variable efficacy. Standardized protocols, larger controlled trials, and personalized microbiome-based approaches are necessary to refine these therapeutic strategies and enhance clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024615043, identifier CRD42024615043.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1648118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1648118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is increasingly linked to gut microbiota imbalances, influencing both behavioral and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This systematic review assesses the efficacy of microbiota-based interventions, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), in improving ASD-related symptoms, aiming to provide insights into their therapeutic potential and inform future clinical applications.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024615043). A structured literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized trials (NRTs), and retrospective studies assessing the impact of microbiota-based interventions on ASD-related behavioral and GI outcomes. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using standardized risk-of-bias tools.

Results: 33 studies were included, consisting of 16 RCTs, 14 NRTs, and 3 retrospective studies. Among them, 15 assessed probiotics, 4 prebiotics, 5 synbiotics, and 9 FMT. Probiotics showed moderate behavioral improvements in ASD, with multi-strain formulations being more effective than single strains. Prebiotics and synbiotics yielded mixed results, with some studies indicating benefits in behavioral and GI symptoms. FMT demonstrated the most consistent and sustained improvements in both ASD-related behaviors and GI function. Adverse events were minimal, primarily involving transient GI symptoms.

Conclusion: Microbiota-targeted interventions, particularly FMT, hold promise for managing ASD symptoms, though probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics present variable efficacy. Standardized protocols, larger controlled trials, and personalized microbiome-based approaches are necessary to refine these therapeutic strategies and enhance clinical applicability.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024615043, identifier CRD42024615043.

基于微生物群的自闭症谱系障碍干预:疗效和临床潜力的系统回顾。
目的:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)越来越多地与肠道微生物群失衡联系在一起,影响行为和胃肠道(GI)症状。本系统综述评估了以微生物群为基础的干预措施,包括益生菌、益生元、合成菌和粪便微生物群移植(FMT),在改善asd相关症状方面的疗效,旨在深入了解其治疗潜力,并为未来的临床应用提供信息。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行全面的系统评价,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024615043)。在PubMed、Cochrane Library和Scopus中进行结构化文献检索,以确定同行评议的英语研究。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验(rct)、非随机试验(nrt)和评估微生物群干预对asd相关行为和GI结果影响的回顾性研究。两名独立审稿人使用标准化的偏倚风险工具进行研究选择、数据提取和质量评估。结果:共纳入33项研究,包括16项rct、14项nrt和3项回顾性研究。其中益生菌15种,益生元4种,合成菌5种,FMT 9种。益生菌对ASD的行为有中度改善,多菌株制剂比单一菌株更有效。益生元和合成菌产生了不同的结果,一些研究表明对行为和胃肠道症状有好处。FMT在asd相关行为和GI功能方面表现出最一致和持续的改善。不良事件很少,主要包括短暂的胃肠道症状。结论:针对微生物群的干预措施,特别是FMT,有望控制ASD症状,尽管益生菌、益生元和合成菌的疗效各不相同。标准化的方案、更大规模的对照试验和个性化的基于微生物组的方法是完善这些治疗策略和提高临床适用性的必要条件。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024615043,标识符CRD42024615043。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信