Zhong Hong Liew, Miao Li Chee, Riswana Banu, Yulia Liem, Ching-Yu Cheng, Cynthia Ciwei Lim, Charumathi Sabanayagam
{"title":"Novel eGFR equations and cardiovascular outcomes in a multiethnic Asian cohort.","authors":"Zhong Hong Liew, Miao Li Chee, Riswana Banu, Yulia Liem, Ching-Yu Cheng, Cynthia Ciwei Lim, Charumathi Sabanayagam","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Novel creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations were proposed for chronic kidney disease (CKD) evaluation but their comparative ability to predict mortality and cardiovascular events is less established. We compared four Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations and three European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equations in predicting risk for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in multiethnic Asians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed analysis of Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases population-based cohort that recruited Chinese and Indian aged 40-80 years between 2007 and 2011. The outcomes of death and incident cardiovascular events were ascertained by data linkage with National Registry of Diseases Office until 31 March 2021. Using Cox proportional hazards model, we conducted multivariable regression analyses to evaluate the association of CKD and outcomes. C-statistic was performed to compare prediction performance of these equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a mean follow-up of 11.3 ± 2.2 years, the all-cause mortality rate was 12.9% (743 of 5738 participants). When using Creat-ASR 2009, Creat-AS 2021, Cys 2012, Creat-cys 2021, EKFCcreat, EKFCcys and EKFCcreat-cys, mortality rates among those with CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) were 41.3%, 45.3%, 39.7%, 47.9%, 41.4%, 43.1% and 45.8%, respectively. After excluding those with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), incident cardiovascular event rate was 9.9% (508 of 5120 participants). For all-cause mortality, Creat-cys 2021 (C-index 0.809) had better predictive ability than Creat-ASR 2009 (0.806, <i>P</i> = .001), Creat-AS 2021 (0.807, <i>P</i> = .016) and EKFCcreat (0.806, <i>P</i> = .001). For incident CVD, there was no difference in CVD prediction between Creat-cys 2021 (C-index 0.794) and EKFCcreat (0.792, <i>P</i> = .263) or Creat-AS 2021 (0.790, <i>P</i> = .050).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Creat-cys 2021 outperformed creatinine-based GFR equations and demonstrated comparable performance to Cys 2012, EKFCcys and EKFCcreat-cys in predicting all-cause mortality. For incident CVD, Creat-AS 2021 and EKFCcreat demonstrated performance comparable to that of Cys 2012, Creat-cys 2021, EKFCcys and EKFCcreat-cys, providing cost-effective and equally reliable alternatives in this multiethnic Asian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 10","pages":"sfaf289"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Novel creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations were proposed for chronic kidney disease (CKD) evaluation but their comparative ability to predict mortality and cardiovascular events is less established. We compared four Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations and three European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equations in predicting risk for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in multiethnic Asians.
Methods: We performed analysis of Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases population-based cohort that recruited Chinese and Indian aged 40-80 years between 2007 and 2011. The outcomes of death and incident cardiovascular events were ascertained by data linkage with National Registry of Diseases Office until 31 March 2021. Using Cox proportional hazards model, we conducted multivariable regression analyses to evaluate the association of CKD and outcomes. C-statistic was performed to compare prediction performance of these equations.
Results: During a mean follow-up of 11.3 ± 2.2 years, the all-cause mortality rate was 12.9% (743 of 5738 participants). When using Creat-ASR 2009, Creat-AS 2021, Cys 2012, Creat-cys 2021, EKFCcreat, EKFCcys and EKFCcreat-cys, mortality rates among those with CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were 41.3%, 45.3%, 39.7%, 47.9%, 41.4%, 43.1% and 45.8%, respectively. After excluding those with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), incident cardiovascular event rate was 9.9% (508 of 5120 participants). For all-cause mortality, Creat-cys 2021 (C-index 0.809) had better predictive ability than Creat-ASR 2009 (0.806, P = .001), Creat-AS 2021 (0.807, P = .016) and EKFCcreat (0.806, P = .001). For incident CVD, there was no difference in CVD prediction between Creat-cys 2021 (C-index 0.794) and EKFCcreat (0.792, P = .263) or Creat-AS 2021 (0.790, P = .050).
Conclusion: Creat-cys 2021 outperformed creatinine-based GFR equations and demonstrated comparable performance to Cys 2012, EKFCcys and EKFCcreat-cys in predicting all-cause mortality. For incident CVD, Creat-AS 2021 and EKFCcreat demonstrated performance comparable to that of Cys 2012, Creat-cys 2021, EKFCcys and EKFCcreat-cys, providing cost-effective and equally reliable alternatives in this multiethnic Asian population.
期刊介绍:
About the Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.