Guide extension catheters in coronary intervention: device selection, technical insights, and clinical applications.

IF 5.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yoshiyasu Minami, Takayuki Warisawa, Aritomo Katsura, Takuma Tsuda, Kenichi Hagiya, Koki Shishido, Takuya Hashimoto, Takashi Ashikaga
{"title":"Guide extension catheters in coronary intervention: device selection, technical insights, and clinical applications.","authors":"Yoshiyasu Minami, Takayuki Warisawa, Aritomo Katsura, Takuma Tsuda, Kenichi Hagiya, Koki Shishido, Takuya Hashimoto, Takashi Ashikaga","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01207-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly with technological advances, allowing for higher procedural success rates and improved patient outcomes. However, the growing complexity of cases involving severely calcified lesions, tortuous vessels, and chronic total occlusions has increased procedural challenges. In such scenarios, the guide extension catheter (GEC, or guiding catheter extension) plays a critical role by enhancing device passage and providing additional backup support, making it indispensable in modern PCI. Various types of GECs offer distinct characteristics that influence their selection based on lesion type, device compatibility, and procedural requirements. The GEC is used for multiple purposes, including backup support, deep engagement, imaging device insertion, stent protection, thrombectomy, and foreign body removal. Despite its utility, GEC use is associated with potential complications, including vessel injury, thrombosis, air embolism, and hemodynamic instability. Careful technique and proper selection are critical to minimizing risks. Overall, the GEC is an essential tool in complex PCI procedures, offering significant advantages in improving procedural success.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01207-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly with technological advances, allowing for higher procedural success rates and improved patient outcomes. However, the growing complexity of cases involving severely calcified lesions, tortuous vessels, and chronic total occlusions has increased procedural challenges. In such scenarios, the guide extension catheter (GEC, or guiding catheter extension) plays a critical role by enhancing device passage and providing additional backup support, making it indispensable in modern PCI. Various types of GECs offer distinct characteristics that influence their selection based on lesion type, device compatibility, and procedural requirements. The GEC is used for multiple purposes, including backup support, deep engagement, imaging device insertion, stent protection, thrombectomy, and foreign body removal. Despite its utility, GEC use is associated with potential complications, including vessel injury, thrombosis, air embolism, and hemodynamic instability. Careful technique and proper selection are critical to minimizing risks. Overall, the GEC is an essential tool in complex PCI procedures, offering significant advantages in improving procedural success.

冠状动脉介入治疗中的导管延伸:设备选择、技术见解和临床应用。
随着技术的进步,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已经有了显著的发展,允许更高的手术成功率和改善的患者预后。然而,涉及严重钙化病变、血管扭曲和慢性全闭塞的病例日益复杂,增加了手术难度。在这种情况下,导尿管延长导管(GEC,或导尿管延长)通过增强器械通道和提供额外的备份支持发挥关键作用,使其在现代PCI中不可或缺。不同类型的gec具有不同的特征,这些特征影响了基于病变类型、设备兼容性和程序要求的选择。GEC可用于多种用途,包括后备支持、深度接触、成像设备插入、支架保护、血栓切除和异物清除。尽管它很实用,但GEC的使用与潜在的并发症有关,包括血管损伤、血栓形成、空气栓塞和血流动力学不稳定。谨慎的技术和正确的选择是最小化风险的关键。总的来说,GEC是复杂PCI手术中必不可少的工具,在提高手术成功率方面具有显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信