Engagement and cognitive load of upper-year medical trainees during mixed reality-enhanced dissection.

IF 4.7 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Geoffroy P J C Noel, Isabella Xiao, Maher Chaouachi, Alexandru Ilie, Jeremy O'Brien, Sean C McWatt
{"title":"Engagement and cognitive load of upper-year medical trainees during mixed reality-enhanced dissection.","authors":"Geoffroy P J C Noel, Isabella Xiao, Maher Chaouachi, Alexandru Ilie, Jeremy O'Brien, Sean C McWatt","doi":"10.1002/ase.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mixed reality (MR) offers a way to visualize and manipulate complex digital objects in three dimensions, which is particularly beneficial for human anatomy. However, implementing MR effectively requires a deep understanding of its effects on cognitive processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate cognitive markers of students' engagement and cognitive load while they used MR technology to overlay donor-specific diagnostic imaging onto the corresponding body donors in a fourth-year medical elective course. During two separate dissection sessions, each participant (n = 12) used the imaging on (1) a head-mounted Microsoft HoloLens and (2) an Apple iPad to examine the underlying anatomy of their body donor before beginning dissection. During each activity, participants wore portable five-lead electroencephalographic (EEG) devices to collect cognitive processing data. Separate indexes were calculated from those data to quantify engagement (engagement index; EI) and cognitive load (theta-alpha ratio; TAR), which were compared between HoloLens and iPad usage. Mean EI calculated from EEG data collected while using the HoloLens (0.499 ± 0.038) was significantly higher than the mean EI while using an iPad (0.297 ± 0.037; p = 0.002). Conversely, the mean TAR calculated from EEG data collected while using the HoloLens (1.508 ± 0.047) was significantly lower than that collected while using an iPad (1.813 ± 0.071; p = 0.012). These results indicate that the use of HoloLens to superimpose radiographic images onto a human body donor during dissection is significantly more engaging and requires less cognitive effort than the same task on an iPad.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixed reality (MR) offers a way to visualize and manipulate complex digital objects in three dimensions, which is particularly beneficial for human anatomy. However, implementing MR effectively requires a deep understanding of its effects on cognitive processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate cognitive markers of students' engagement and cognitive load while they used MR technology to overlay donor-specific diagnostic imaging onto the corresponding body donors in a fourth-year medical elective course. During two separate dissection sessions, each participant (n = 12) used the imaging on (1) a head-mounted Microsoft HoloLens and (2) an Apple iPad to examine the underlying anatomy of their body donor before beginning dissection. During each activity, participants wore portable five-lead electroencephalographic (EEG) devices to collect cognitive processing data. Separate indexes were calculated from those data to quantify engagement (engagement index; EI) and cognitive load (theta-alpha ratio; TAR), which were compared between HoloLens and iPad usage. Mean EI calculated from EEG data collected while using the HoloLens (0.499 ± 0.038) was significantly higher than the mean EI while using an iPad (0.297 ± 0.037; p = 0.002). Conversely, the mean TAR calculated from EEG data collected while using the HoloLens (1.508 ± 0.047) was significantly lower than that collected while using an iPad (1.813 ± 0.071; p = 0.012). These results indicate that the use of HoloLens to superimpose radiographic images onto a human body donor during dissection is significantly more engaging and requires less cognitive effort than the same task on an iPad.

高年级医学实习生在混合现实增强解剖中的参与和认知负荷。
混合现实(MR)提供了一种在三维空间中可视化和操作复杂数字物体的方法,这对人体解剖学特别有益。然而,有效地实施MR需要深入了解其对认知过程的影响。本研究的目的是评估在四年制医学选修课程中,当学生使用磁共振技术将捐赠者特异性诊断成像覆盖到相应的身体捐赠者上时,他们的参与和认知负荷的认知标记。在两个独立的解剖过程中,每个参与者(n = 12)在开始解剖之前使用(1)头戴式微软HoloLens和(2)苹果iPad上的成像来检查其身体捐赠者的基础解剖结构。在每次活动中,参与者佩戴便携式五导联脑电图(EEG)设备来收集认知处理数据。从这些数据中计算出单独的指数来量化参与度(参与度指数;EI)和认知负荷(theta-alpha ratio; TAR),并将HoloLens和iPad的使用情况进行比较。使用HoloLens时的平均EI(0.499±0.038)显著高于使用iPad时的平均EI(0.297±0.037;p = 0.002)。相反,使用HoloLens采集的EEG数据计算的平均TAR(1.508±0.047)显著低于使用iPad采集的平均TAR(1.813±0.071;p = 0.012)。这些结果表明,在解剖过程中,使用HoloLens将放射图像叠加到人体供体上,比在iPad上完成同样的任务更有吸引力,需要的认知能力也更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信