Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Plus Standard of Care (SOC) in Resectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Postoperative Risk Subgroup Analysis of KEYNOTE-689
N.Y. Lee , D. Adkins , R.I. Haddad , Y. Tao , C. Le Tourneau , W.H. Westra , R. Chernock , M. Tahara , K. Harrington , A. Klochikhin , R. Granado Carrasco , G.V. Alves , B.G.M. Hughes , M. Oliva , I.P. Figueiredo Lima , T. Ueda , C. Manschot , K. Benjamin , B. Gumuscu , R. Uppaluri
{"title":"Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Plus Standard of Care (SOC) in Resectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Postoperative Risk Subgroup Analysis of KEYNOTE-689","authors":"N.Y. Lee , D. Adkins , R.I. Haddad , Y. Tao , C. Le Tourneau , W.H. Westra , R. Chernock , M. Tahara , K. Harrington , A. Klochikhin , R. Granado Carrasco , G.V. Alves , B.G.M. Hughes , M. Oliva , I.P. Figueiredo Lima , T. Ueda , C. Manschot , K. Benjamin , B. Gumuscu , R. Uppaluri","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.08.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>The addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant (starting concurrently with postoperative radiotherapy [PORT] ± cisplatin) pembro to SOC significantly improved event-free survival (EFS) vs SOC alone for participants (pts) with resectable LA HNSCC in the randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study (NCT03765918). We present a subgroup analysis by postoperative pathological features.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Pts had resectable SCC of the oral cavity/larynx/hypopharynx (stage III/IVA) or oropharynx (stage III/IVA p16− or stage III T4 N0-2 p16+) and were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W (2 cycles neoadjuvant, 3 cycles adjuvant concurrent with PORT, 12 cycles beyond PORT) + SOC vs SOC (surgery + PORT [60 Gy in 30 fractions for low risk or 66 Gy in 33 fractions for high risk] ± 3 cycles cisplatin 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> Q3W [high risk only]). Postoperative pathological features by blinded independent pathologist review were based on the presence (high risk) or absence (low risk) of positive margins (<1 mm) or extranodal extension. EFS by blinded independent central review with pembro + SOC vs SOC by risk subgroups was a prespecified exploratory analysis. Formal statistical testing was not planned. As of 25 July 2024, the median follow-up for all pts was 38.3 mo (range, 9.0–66.5).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 363 pts randomized to pembro + SOC and 351 to SOC: 321 (88.4%) and 308 (87.7%) completed surgery; 118 (32.5%) and 156 (44.4%) had presence of high-risk features, and 196 (54.0%) and 148 (42.2%) did not. 274 pts in the pembro + SOC group and 275 in the SOC group received PORT, of whom 107 and 139 pts also received concurrent cisplatin (median 3 cycles in both groups). Median (range) total PORT dose was 60.0 Gy (2.0–70.0) in the pembro + SOC group and 66.0 Gy (6.0–72.0) in the SOC group. In the high-risk subgroup, median EFS was 41.1 vs 19.5 mo, respectively (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52–1.05). The 3-year EFS was 52.0% vs 40.7%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 52.1% vs 53.9% of pts. Any-cause AEs led to discontinuation of PORT in 3 pts in the pembro + SOC group and 1 pt in the SOC group. In the low-risk subgroup, median EFS was not reached vs 51.5 mo (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51–1.08). The 3-year EFS was 67.7% vs 58.8%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 42.9% vs 30.4% of pts. Any-cause AEs led to discontinuation of PORT in 4 pts in the pembro + SOC group and 3 pts in the SOC group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Efficacy results for pts with either presence or absence of high-risk pathological features after surgery demonstrated downgrading of pathological features with the addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembro to SOC, consistent with the primary analysis of KEYNOTE-689. In the pembro + SOC group, fewer pts had high-risk pathological features and more pts received a lower radiation dose and no cisplatin. The safety profile of pembro + PORT ± cisplatin was in line with expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"123 4","pages":"Pages 1203-1204"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301625061735","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s)
The addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant (starting concurrently with postoperative radiotherapy [PORT] ± cisplatin) pembro to SOC significantly improved event-free survival (EFS) vs SOC alone for participants (pts) with resectable LA HNSCC in the randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study (NCT03765918). We present a subgroup analysis by postoperative pathological features.
Materials/Methods
Pts had resectable SCC of the oral cavity/larynx/hypopharynx (stage III/IVA) or oropharynx (stage III/IVA p16− or stage III T4 N0-2 p16+) and were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W (2 cycles neoadjuvant, 3 cycles adjuvant concurrent with PORT, 12 cycles beyond PORT) + SOC vs SOC (surgery + PORT [60 Gy in 30 fractions for low risk or 66 Gy in 33 fractions for high risk] ± 3 cycles cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Q3W [high risk only]). Postoperative pathological features by blinded independent pathologist review were based on the presence (high risk) or absence (low risk) of positive margins (<1 mm) or extranodal extension. EFS by blinded independent central review with pembro + SOC vs SOC by risk subgroups was a prespecified exploratory analysis. Formal statistical testing was not planned. As of 25 July 2024, the median follow-up for all pts was 38.3 mo (range, 9.0–66.5).
Results
Among 363 pts randomized to pembro + SOC and 351 to SOC: 321 (88.4%) and 308 (87.7%) completed surgery; 118 (32.5%) and 156 (44.4%) had presence of high-risk features, and 196 (54.0%) and 148 (42.2%) did not. 274 pts in the pembro + SOC group and 275 in the SOC group received PORT, of whom 107 and 139 pts also received concurrent cisplatin (median 3 cycles in both groups). Median (range) total PORT dose was 60.0 Gy (2.0–70.0) in the pembro + SOC group and 66.0 Gy (6.0–72.0) in the SOC group. In the high-risk subgroup, median EFS was 41.1 vs 19.5 mo, respectively (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52–1.05). The 3-year EFS was 52.0% vs 40.7%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 52.1% vs 53.9% of pts. Any-cause AEs led to discontinuation of PORT in 3 pts in the pembro + SOC group and 1 pt in the SOC group. In the low-risk subgroup, median EFS was not reached vs 51.5 mo (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51–1.08). The 3-year EFS was 67.7% vs 58.8%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 42.9% vs 30.4% of pts. Any-cause AEs led to discontinuation of PORT in 4 pts in the pembro + SOC group and 3 pts in the SOC group.
Conclusion
Efficacy results for pts with either presence or absence of high-risk pathological features after surgery demonstrated downgrading of pathological features with the addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembro to SOC, consistent with the primary analysis of KEYNOTE-689. In the pembro + SOC group, fewer pts had high-risk pathological features and more pts received a lower radiation dose and no cisplatin. The safety profile of pembro + PORT ± cisplatin was in line with expectations.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.