Perceptions of COVID-19-related nudges in the Arab world: A cross-country analysis of approval rates and associated factors.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-10-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004692
Fadi Makki, Belal Nedal Sabbah, Hani Tamim, Mariam Abdelnabi, Paola Schietekat, Nabil Saleh, Ali Osseiran, Abdulkarim Almakadma, Mohamed Al-Komi, Ebaa Alsayed, Rajaa Fakhoury, Fatima Saleh, Basema Saddik, Hana M A Fakhoury, Sarah Daher, Cass R Sunstein
{"title":"Perceptions of COVID-19-related nudges in the Arab world: A cross-country analysis of approval rates and associated factors.","authors":"Fadi Makki, Belal Nedal Sabbah, Hani Tamim, Mariam Abdelnabi, Paola Schietekat, Nabil Saleh, Ali Osseiran, Abdulkarim Almakadma, Mohamed Al-Komi, Ebaa Alsayed, Rajaa Fakhoury, Fatima Saleh, Basema Saddik, Hana M A Fakhoury, Sarah Daher, Cass R Sunstein","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated novel approaches to influence public behavior. While \"nudging\" has gained prominence in Western contexts, its perception and effectiveness in the Arab world remain understudied. This study aimed to investigate the approval of COVID-19-related nudges across four Arab countries and explore associated sociodemographic factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2020 to January 2022, involving 698 participants from Egypt, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Participants were presented with eight hypothetical COVID-19-related nudges categorized according to distinct behavioral mechanisms: choice architecture (e.g., floor markers, prominent placement of fruits and vegetables), information disclosure (publicly sharing infection causes), moral appeals (letters from elderly urging compliance), social norm enforcement (public shaming of violators and use of spoilers on billboards), and surveillance-based interventions (GPS tracking of quarantined individuals). Approval rates varied widely (50%-95%). Less intrusive nudges received the highest support: supermarket floor markers (95.4%), prominent display of fruits and vegetables (88.8%), park area divisions (82.0%), infection cause disclosure (86.5%), and elderly letters urging compliance (84.1%). Approval was lower for more intrusive measures, including billboard spoilers (52.0%) and public shaming of curfew violators (49.9%). GPS tracking, the most intrusive intervention, received intermediate approval (72.8%). Higher COVID-19 concern was significantly associated with greater approval of nudges (p < 0.001), with age, gender, and family COVID-19 status also influencing approval rates. These findings demonstrate generally positive attitudes towards COVID-19-related nudges among university affiliates in four Arab countries, with clear variations according to nudge type, intrusiveness, and sociodemographic characteristics. While the results offer valuable insights for culturally tailored behavioral interventions in the Arab world, they reflect a university setting and may not be generalizable to the broader public.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 10","pages":"e0004692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated novel approaches to influence public behavior. While "nudging" has gained prominence in Western contexts, its perception and effectiveness in the Arab world remain understudied. This study aimed to investigate the approval of COVID-19-related nudges across four Arab countries and explore associated sociodemographic factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2020 to January 2022, involving 698 participants from Egypt, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Participants were presented with eight hypothetical COVID-19-related nudges categorized according to distinct behavioral mechanisms: choice architecture (e.g., floor markers, prominent placement of fruits and vegetables), information disclosure (publicly sharing infection causes), moral appeals (letters from elderly urging compliance), social norm enforcement (public shaming of violators and use of spoilers on billboards), and surveillance-based interventions (GPS tracking of quarantined individuals). Approval rates varied widely (50%-95%). Less intrusive nudges received the highest support: supermarket floor markers (95.4%), prominent display of fruits and vegetables (88.8%), park area divisions (82.0%), infection cause disclosure (86.5%), and elderly letters urging compliance (84.1%). Approval was lower for more intrusive measures, including billboard spoilers (52.0%) and public shaming of curfew violators (49.9%). GPS tracking, the most intrusive intervention, received intermediate approval (72.8%). Higher COVID-19 concern was significantly associated with greater approval of nudges (p < 0.001), with age, gender, and family COVID-19 status also influencing approval rates. These findings demonstrate generally positive attitudes towards COVID-19-related nudges among university affiliates in four Arab countries, with clear variations according to nudge type, intrusiveness, and sociodemographic characteristics. While the results offer valuable insights for culturally tailored behavioral interventions in the Arab world, they reflect a university setting and may not be generalizable to the broader public.

阿拉伯世界对covid -19相关推动的看法:对批准率和相关因素的跨国分析
COVID-19大流行需要新的方法来影响公众行为。虽然“轻推”在西方环境中得到了突出表现,但其在阿拉伯世界的认知和有效性仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在调查四个阿拉伯国家对covid -19相关推文的批准情况,并探讨相关的社会人口因素。一项横断面研究于2020年11月至2022年1月进行,涉及来自埃及、黎巴嫩、沙特阿拉伯和阿拉伯联合酋长国的698名参与者。根据不同的行为机制,向参与者提供了八种与covid -19相关的假设轻推:选择架构(例如,地板标记,水果和蔬菜的突出位置),信息披露(公开分享感染原因),道德呼吁(老年人敦促遵守的信件),社会规范执行(公开羞辱违规者和在广告牌上使用剧剧),以及基于监视的干预措施(GPS跟踪被隔离的个人)。支持率相差很大(50%-95%)。较不具侵入性的推动得到的支持度最高:超市地板标记(95.4%)、水果和蔬菜的突出展示(88.8%)、公园区域划分(82.0%)、感染原因披露(86.5%)和老年人敦促遵守(84.1%)。对更具侵入性的措施的支持率较低,包括广告牌剧透(52.0%)和公开羞辱违反宵禁者(49.9%)。GPS跟踪是最具侵入性的干预措施,获得了中等程度的认可(72.8%)。对COVID-19的高度关注与更多地批准轻推显着相关(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信