Management support for patient safety in two tertiary hospitals in Jamaica: A mixed methods study.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-10-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005332
Camelia Thompson, Desmalee Holder Nevins, Dawn Walters, Cameal Chin-Bailey, Elon Thompson, Minerva Thame, Kenneth James
{"title":"Management support for patient safety in two tertiary hospitals in Jamaica: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Camelia Thompson, Desmalee Holder Nevins, Dawn Walters, Cameal Chin-Bailey, Elon Thompson, Minerva Thame, Kenneth James","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0005332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Management support is important for implementation of policies and procedures, and to create an organizational culture for the delivery of safe patient care. This study sought to determine the culture for management and safety support at two tertiary hospitals in Jamaica, and to explore managers' involvement in quality and quality improvement activities. A mixed methods study was done among 328 doctors and nurses (quantitative arm) and 17 senior managers (qualitative arm) from two tertiary hospitals. Data on sociodemographic, work-related characteristics and management support for patient safety were collected and in-depth interviews collected explored managers' involvement in quality and quality improvement activities. The percentage positive score was determined for management support for patient safety and a logistic regression model identified independent predictors of positive scores. Thematic analysis identified themes and subthemes. Overall positive percent score for management support for patient safety was 51.57%. Independent predictors of positive scores were staff position, institution and primary area of work. Doctors were 72.4% less likely than nurses to have positive scores (OR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.55, p=<0.001). Participants from Institution B were 2.63 times as likely to have positive score compared to participants from Institution A (OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.40 - 4.96, p = 0.003). Compared to participants whose primary area of work was medicine, participants from accident and emergency and radiology/laboratory units were 3.15 (95% CI: 1.19-8.35, p = 0.021) and 5.18 (95% CI: 1.82-14.76, p = 0.002) times more likely to have positive scores respectively. Two themes (managers' role in quality assurance/improvement and challenges in quality assurance and improvement) and six subthemes emerged from in-depth interviews. Institutions should ensure that there is a clear strategy for quality and quality improvement and implement appropriate systems and structures to support quality-related activities. Boards of hospitals should make quality a key item for discussion and action, to ensure good patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 10","pages":"e0005332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management support is important for implementation of policies and procedures, and to create an organizational culture for the delivery of safe patient care. This study sought to determine the culture for management and safety support at two tertiary hospitals in Jamaica, and to explore managers' involvement in quality and quality improvement activities. A mixed methods study was done among 328 doctors and nurses (quantitative arm) and 17 senior managers (qualitative arm) from two tertiary hospitals. Data on sociodemographic, work-related characteristics and management support for patient safety were collected and in-depth interviews collected explored managers' involvement in quality and quality improvement activities. The percentage positive score was determined for management support for patient safety and a logistic regression model identified independent predictors of positive scores. Thematic analysis identified themes and subthemes. Overall positive percent score for management support for patient safety was 51.57%. Independent predictors of positive scores were staff position, institution and primary area of work. Doctors were 72.4% less likely than nurses to have positive scores (OR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.55, p=<0.001). Participants from Institution B were 2.63 times as likely to have positive score compared to participants from Institution A (OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.40 - 4.96, p = 0.003). Compared to participants whose primary area of work was medicine, participants from accident and emergency and radiology/laboratory units were 3.15 (95% CI: 1.19-8.35, p = 0.021) and 5.18 (95% CI: 1.82-14.76, p = 0.002) times more likely to have positive scores respectively. Two themes (managers' role in quality assurance/improvement and challenges in quality assurance and improvement) and six subthemes emerged from in-depth interviews. Institutions should ensure that there is a clear strategy for quality and quality improvement and implement appropriate systems and structures to support quality-related activities. Boards of hospitals should make quality a key item for discussion and action, to ensure good patient outcomes.

牙买加两所三级医院对患者安全的管理支持:一项混合方法研究。
管理支持对于政策和程序的实施以及为提供安全的患者护理创造组织文化非常重要。本研究旨在确定牙买加两家三级医院的管理和安全支持文化,并探讨管理人员参与质量和质量改进活动的情况。采用混合方法对两所三级医院的328名医生和护士(定量组)和17名高级管理人员(定性组)进行了研究。收集了社会人口学、工作相关特征和管理人员对患者安全的支持数据,并收集了深度访谈,探讨了管理人员对质量和质量改进活动的参与情况。阳性评分的百分比被确定为对患者安全的管理支持,并通过逻辑回归模型确定阳性评分的独立预测因子。专题分析确定了主题和次级主题。管理人员对患者安全支持的总体阳性率为51.57%。正面得分的独立预测因子是员工职位、机构和主要工作领域。医生获得阳性评分的可能性比护士低72.4% (OR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.55, p=
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信