Omalizumab enables bee venom desensitisation in patients with anaphylactic reactions to venom immunotherapy.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Kris Capper, Benjamin McGettigan, Cate Willis, Brittany Stevenson
{"title":"Omalizumab enables bee venom desensitisation in patients with anaphylactic reactions to venom immunotherapy.","authors":"Kris Capper, Benjamin McGettigan, Cate Willis, Brittany Stevenson","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only treatment for honeybee venom allergy; however, some patients develop severe allergic reactions (SAR) during therapy. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, may improve VIT tolerance, though data in honeybee VIT remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant omalizumab in honeybee VIT, identify predictors of omalizumab requirement, and inform protocol selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted of all adults undergoing honeybee VIT at Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, from 2015 to 2024. Baseline characteristics, biomarkers, protocols, and outcomes were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 354 VIT patients, 57 (16%) experienced SARs, with 36 (10%) receiving omalizumab. Predictors of omalizumab need included severe sting anaphylaxis, asthma, and elevated basal tryptase. One patient used omalizumab to escalate VIT dosing after already reaching maintenance. Of 35 patients using omalizumab during VIT up-titration, 22 (63%) achieved unsupported maintenance, 7 (20%) ceased due to SARs, and 5 (14%) remain on omalizumab. Excluding 5 patients who declined or lacked access to ongoing omalizumab, the success rate increases to 73%. The most common protocol involved a 12-week VIT up-titration to 100 μg with omalizumab 300 mg loading 2 weeks prior, followed by 150 mg fortnightly until maintenance VIT was reached. SARs most frequently occurred at omalizumab cessation. In 3 cases, these were overcome by resuming omalizumab with a higher VIT maintenance dose target.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Omalizumab could be considered in patients experiencing recurrent SARs to standard VIT. A semi-rush protocol with omalizumab loading 1 to 2 weeks prior was well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only treatment for honeybee venom allergy; however, some patients develop severe allergic reactions (SAR) during therapy. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, may improve VIT tolerance, though data in honeybee VIT remain limited.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant omalizumab in honeybee VIT, identify predictors of omalizumab requirement, and inform protocol selection.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all adults undergoing honeybee VIT at Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, from 2015 to 2024. Baseline characteristics, biomarkers, protocols, and outcomes were analysed.

Results: Among 354 VIT patients, 57 (16%) experienced SARs, with 36 (10%) receiving omalizumab. Predictors of omalizumab need included severe sting anaphylaxis, asthma, and elevated basal tryptase. One patient used omalizumab to escalate VIT dosing after already reaching maintenance. Of 35 patients using omalizumab during VIT up-titration, 22 (63%) achieved unsupported maintenance, 7 (20%) ceased due to SARs, and 5 (14%) remain on omalizumab. Excluding 5 patients who declined or lacked access to ongoing omalizumab, the success rate increases to 73%. The most common protocol involved a 12-week VIT up-titration to 100 μg with omalizumab 300 mg loading 2 weeks prior, followed by 150 mg fortnightly until maintenance VIT was reached. SARs most frequently occurred at omalizumab cessation. In 3 cases, these were overcome by resuming omalizumab with a higher VIT maintenance dose target.

Conclusion: Omalizumab could be considered in patients experiencing recurrent SARs to standard VIT. A semi-rush protocol with omalizumab loading 1 to 2 weeks prior was well tolerated.

Omalizumab使蜂毒脱敏患者对毒液免疫治疗的过敏反应。
背景:蜂毒免疫疗法(VIT)是治疗蜂毒过敏的唯一方法;然而,一些患者在治疗期间出现严重的过敏反应(SAR)。Omalizumab,一种抗ige抗体,可能改善VIT耐受性,尽管蜜蜂VIT的数据仍然有限。目的:评价omalizumab佐剂治疗蜜蜂VIT的疗效,确定omalizumab需求的预测因素,并为方案选择提供信息。方法:对2015年至2024年在西澳大利亚珀斯Fiona Stanley医院接受蜜蜂VIT治疗的所有成年人进行回顾性图表回顾。分析基线特征、生物标志物、方案和结果。结果:在354例VIT患者中,57例(16%)发生了SARs,其中36例(10%)接受了omalizumab治疗。omalizumab需求的预测因素包括严重的刺痛过敏反应、哮喘和基础胰蛋白酶升高。一名患者在达到维持剂量后使用omalizumab增加VIT剂量。在VIT上升滴定期间使用omalizumab的35例患者中,22例(63%)实现无支持维持,7例(20%)因SARs停止,5例(14%)继续使用omalizumab。排除5名拒绝或无法获得正在进行的omalizumab的患者,成功率增加到73%。最常见的治疗方案包括:将12周的VIT滴定至100 μg,奥玛珠单抗在2周前负荷300 mg,然后每两周增加150 mg,直到达到维持VIT。SARs最常见于停药时。在3例病例中,通过恢复使用更高的VIT维持剂量目标的omalizumab来克服这些问题。结论:奥玛单抗可用于复发性SARs患者的标准VIT。在1 - 2周之前使用omalizumab负荷的半匆忙方案耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信