Drug-coated balloons for coronary bifurcation lesions.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Simone Fezzi, Bruno Scheller, Tuomas T Rissanen, Renata Malivojevic, Domenico Tavella, Mattia Lunardi, Bernardo Cortese, Adrian Banning, Gabriele Pesarini, Flavio Ribichini, Roberto Scarsini
{"title":"Drug-coated balloons for coronary bifurcation lesions.","authors":"Simone Fezzi, Bruno Scheller, Tuomas T Rissanen, Renata Malivojevic, Domenico Tavella, Mattia Lunardi, Bernardo Cortese, Adrian Banning, Gabriele Pesarini, Flavio Ribichini, Roberto Scarsini","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) represent a common and challenging subset of coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While drug-eluting stents (DES) remain the cornerstone of treatment, their use is associated with risks such as restenosis, thrombosis, side branch (SB) jailing and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising alternative, delivering antiproliferative drugs without permanent implants, thereby reducing the risk of late complications and preserving native vessel geometry. This review explores the role of DCBs in CBL management, particularly for SB treatment within the provisional stenting strategy. Evidence from clinical studies indicates that DCBs significantly reduce late lumen loss and restenosis in the SB compared to plain balloon angioplasty, while simplifying PCI procedures and avoiding extensive stenting. Furthermore, hybrid/blended strategies combining DCBs with DES have shown superior clinical and angiographic outcomes in true CBLs compared to DES-only approaches. Despite their potential, the adoption of DCBs faces challenges, including the need for optimal lesion preparation and a lack of standardised procedural techniques. Existing randomised controlled trials are limited by small sample sizes, design heterogeneity, inclusion of bare metal stents either as comparators or as part of the treatment strategy, and inconsistent use of key procedural steps such as proximal optimisation technique and kissing balloon inflation. This manuscript aims to provide interventional cardiologists with practical guidance for managing CBLs, focusing on the effective integration of DCBs into standalone and hybrid strategies. By emphasising procedural optimisation and complication reduction, this review seeks to promote more standardised and reproducible approaches in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) represent a common and challenging subset of coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While drug-eluting stents (DES) remain the cornerstone of treatment, their use is associated with risks such as restenosis, thrombosis, side branch (SB) jailing and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising alternative, delivering antiproliferative drugs without permanent implants, thereby reducing the risk of late complications and preserving native vessel geometry. This review explores the role of DCBs in CBL management, particularly for SB treatment within the provisional stenting strategy. Evidence from clinical studies indicates that DCBs significantly reduce late lumen loss and restenosis in the SB compared to plain balloon angioplasty, while simplifying PCI procedures and avoiding extensive stenting. Furthermore, hybrid/blended strategies combining DCBs with DES have shown superior clinical and angiographic outcomes in true CBLs compared to DES-only approaches. Despite their potential, the adoption of DCBs faces challenges, including the need for optimal lesion preparation and a lack of standardised procedural techniques. Existing randomised controlled trials are limited by small sample sizes, design heterogeneity, inclusion of bare metal stents either as comparators or as part of the treatment strategy, and inconsistent use of key procedural steps such as proximal optimisation technique and kissing balloon inflation. This manuscript aims to provide interventional cardiologists with practical guidance for managing CBLs, focusing on the effective integration of DCBs into standalone and hybrid strategies. By emphasising procedural optimisation and complication reduction, this review seeks to promote more standardised and reproducible approaches in clinical practice.

药物包被球囊用于冠状动脉分叉病变。
冠状动脉分叉病变(CBLs)是一种常见且具有挑战性的冠状动脉疾病,需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。虽然药物洗脱支架(DES)仍然是治疗的基石,但其使用与再狭窄、血栓形成、侧分支(SB)监禁等风险相关,并且需要长时间的双重抗血小板治疗。药物包被气球(DCBs)已成为一种很有前途的替代方案,无需永久植入即可提供抗增殖药物,从而降低晚期并发症的风险并保留原有血管的几何形状。这篇综述探讨了dcb在CBL管理中的作用,特别是在临时支架置入策略中的SB治疗。来自临床研究的证据表明,与普通球囊血管成形术相比,dcb显著减少了SB的晚期管腔损失和再狭窄,同时简化了PCI手术程序,避免了广泛的支架置入。此外,与仅使用DES的方法相比,将dcb与DES结合的混合/混合策略在真正的CBLs中显示出更好的临床和血管造影结果。尽管具有潜力,但采用DCBs仍面临挑战,包括需要最佳病变准备和缺乏标准化的手术技术。现有的随机对照试验受到样本量小、设计异质性、将裸金属支架作为比较物或治疗策略的一部分以及关键程序步骤(如近端优化技术和接吻气球膨胀)使用不一致的限制。本文旨在为介入心脏病专家提供管理cbs的实践指导,重点是将dcb有效地整合到独立和混合策略中。通过强调程序优化和减少并发症,本综述旨在促进临床实践中更标准化和可重复的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信