Spinal dysraphism in newborns: Screening factors for prioritizing rapid spinal ultrasonography from a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Lorena Wagnez, Mélodie-Anne Karnoub, Thameur Rakza, Constance Marié, Pierre Tourneux
{"title":"Spinal dysraphism in newborns: Screening factors for prioritizing rapid spinal ultrasonography from a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Lorena Wagnez, Mélodie-Anne Karnoub, Thameur Rakza, Constance Marié, Pierre Tourneux","doi":"10.1016/j.arcped.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal dysraphism is a common condition and may be either open or occult. Occult dysraphism is generally diagnosed in the postnatal period through clinical examination and spinal ultrasonography (USG). Clinical signs of spinal dysraphism are common and not specific. Several spinal USG are required to confirm or exclude this condition. It is crucial to identify the infants at highest risk of dysraphism for rapid USG, and avoid unnecessary screening. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between clinical examination signs and spinal USG examination results to determine which clinical signs are associated with a high risk of dysraphism, to facilitate the prioritization of infants for spinal USG examinations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study in a regional neurosurgical and neonatal reference center, from January 2017 to December 2021. All infants undergoing screening for spinal dysraphism by USG during this period based on clinical indicators in the lumbosacral region were included. Infants who underwent spinal USG as part of a systematic assessment were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of abnormal USG results. The clinical characteristics of patients with suspected dysraphism were collected and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 144 patients, 22.2 % USG results were abnormal suggesting occult dysraphism. USG was performed due to the presence of a simple sacral dimple in 41.7 % infants which was strongly associated with a normal USG result (RR = 0.32 <sub>95 %</sub>CI [0.14 - 0.70]; p = 0.0029), whereas abnormal USG results were more frequent in patients with gluteal cleft abnormalities (RR = 3.09 <sub>95 %</sub>CI [1.5 - 5.2]; p = 0.0029).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical signs such as sacral dimple or gluteal cleft abnormality could help prioritizing USG. The use of a diagnostic tree based on a \"step-by-step\" model would make it possible to avoid some unnecessary USG and would allow comparative international studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55477,"journal":{"name":"Archives De Pediatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives De Pediatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2025.07.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal dysraphism is a common condition and may be either open or occult. Occult dysraphism is generally diagnosed in the postnatal period through clinical examination and spinal ultrasonography (USG). Clinical signs of spinal dysraphism are common and not specific. Several spinal USG are required to confirm or exclude this condition. It is crucial to identify the infants at highest risk of dysraphism for rapid USG, and avoid unnecessary screening. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between clinical examination signs and spinal USG examination results to determine which clinical signs are associated with a high risk of dysraphism, to facilitate the prioritization of infants for spinal USG examinations.

Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a regional neurosurgical and neonatal reference center, from January 2017 to December 2021. All infants undergoing screening for spinal dysraphism by USG during this period based on clinical indicators in the lumbosacral region were included. Infants who underwent spinal USG as part of a systematic assessment were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of abnormal USG results. The clinical characteristics of patients with suspected dysraphism were collected and compared between groups.

Results: We included 144 patients, 22.2 % USG results were abnormal suggesting occult dysraphism. USG was performed due to the presence of a simple sacral dimple in 41.7 % infants which was strongly associated with a normal USG result (RR = 0.32 95 %CI [0.14 - 0.70]; p = 0.0029), whereas abnormal USG results were more frequent in patients with gluteal cleft abnormalities (RR = 3.09 95 %CI [1.5 - 5.2]; p = 0.0029).

Conclusion: Clinical signs such as sacral dimple or gluteal cleft abnormality could help prioritizing USG. The use of a diagnostic tree based on a "step-by-step" model would make it possible to avoid some unnecessary USG and would allow comparative international studies.

新生儿脊柱发育异常:从回顾性队列研究中筛选优先进行快速脊柱超声检查的因素。
背景:脊柱畸形是一种常见的疾病,可能是开放性的,也可能是隐匿性的。隐匿性发育异常一般在产后通过临床检查和脊柱超声检查(USG)诊断。脊柱发育不良的临床症状是常见的,并不特殊。需要多次脊髓USG来确认或排除这种情况。关键是要确定婴儿的最高风险的异常书写障碍的快速USG,避免不必要的筛选。本研究的目的是评估临床检查体征与脊柱USG检查结果之间的关系,以确定哪些临床体征与异常书写障碍的高风险相关,从而促进婴儿脊柱USG检查的优先级。患者和方法:2017年1月至2021年12月,我们在一家区域性神经外科和新生儿参考中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。根据腰骶区的临床指标,所有在此期间接受USG筛查脊柱发育异常的婴儿都被纳入其中。将接受脊髓USG作为系统评估的一部分的婴儿排除在外。主要结局是USG结果异常的发生率。收集疑似书写障碍患者的临床特征,并进行组间比较。结果:144例患者中,22.2%的USG结果异常提示有隐匿性异常。41.7%的婴儿由于单纯骶窝的存在而进行USG检查,这与USG结果正常密切相关(RR = 0.32 95% CI [0.14 - 0.70]; p = 0.0029),而臀裂异常患者USG结果异常更为常见(RR = 3.09 95% CI [1.5 - 5.2]; p = 0.0029)。结论:骶窝或臀裂异常等临床症状可帮助确定USG的优先级。使用基于“一步一步”模型的诊断树将有可能避免一些不必要的USG,并允许进行比较国际研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives De Pediatrie
Archives De Pediatrie 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
24.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives de Pédiatrie publishes in English original Research papers, Review articles, Short communications, Practice guidelines, Editorials and Letters in all fields relevant to pediatrics. Eight issues of Archives de Pédiatrie are released annually, as well as supplementary and special editions to complete these regular issues. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. Archives de Pédiatrie is the official publication of the French Society of Pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信