Relationships of Changing State Cannabis Policies with Alcohol Policy Effectiveness and Alcohol or Cannabis Involvement in Motor Vehicle Fatalities.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Timothy S Naimi, Jinhui Zhao, Marlene C Lira, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
{"title":"Relationships of Changing State Cannabis Policies with Alcohol Policy Effectiveness and Alcohol or Cannabis Involvement in Motor Vehicle Fatalities.","authors":"Timothy S Naimi, Jinhui Zhao, Marlene C Lira, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alcohol use is an established and important risk factor for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and crash fatalities. The liberalization of cannabis policy across U.S. states could impact MVC fatalities involving alcohol or the co-use of alcohol and cannabis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mortality data were from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System in 50 states and Washington DC from 2010-2019. State-year Alcohol Policy Scores (APS) and Cannabis Policy Scores (CPS) were used as measures of policy exposure in multivariable mixed logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of two blood alcohol concentration (BAC) thresholds and/or any detectable tetrahydrocannabinol involvement in crash fatalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In fully adjusted models, a 10-percentage point increase in APS (representing more robust alcohol control policies) was associated with a 6.3% lower risk of a BAC> 0.00% (AOR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.886-0.991) or involvement at a BAC ≥0.08% (AOR: 0.938, 95 CI: 0.888-0.992) among MVC decedents. However, there were no significant independent association between CPS and alcohol involvement. A 10-percentage point increase in CPS (representing more robust cannabis control policies) was associated with reduced odds of cannabis involvement (AOR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.922, 0.991) or alcohol and cannabis co-involvement (AOR: 0.962, 95% CI: 0.928, 0.997).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More restrictive alcohol policies and cannabis policies were associated with reduced odds of MVC fatalities involving alcohol or cannabis, respectively. Cannabis policies did not affect protective associations between alcohol policies and alcohol involvement. However, more restrictive cannabis policies were protective for co-involvement of alcohol and cannabis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108137"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alcohol use is an established and important risk factor for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and crash fatalities. The liberalization of cannabis policy across U.S. states could impact MVC fatalities involving alcohol or the co-use of alcohol and cannabis.

Methods: Mortality data were from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System in 50 states and Washington DC from 2010-2019. State-year Alcohol Policy Scores (APS) and Cannabis Policy Scores (CPS) were used as measures of policy exposure in multivariable mixed logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of two blood alcohol concentration (BAC) thresholds and/or any detectable tetrahydrocannabinol involvement in crash fatalities.

Results: In fully adjusted models, a 10-percentage point increase in APS (representing more robust alcohol control policies) was associated with a 6.3% lower risk of a BAC> 0.00% (AOR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.886-0.991) or involvement at a BAC ≥0.08% (AOR: 0.938, 95 CI: 0.888-0.992) among MVC decedents. However, there were no significant independent association between CPS and alcohol involvement. A 10-percentage point increase in CPS (representing more robust cannabis control policies) was associated with reduced odds of cannabis involvement (AOR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.922, 0.991) or alcohol and cannabis co-involvement (AOR: 0.962, 95% CI: 0.928, 0.997).

Conclusions: More restrictive alcohol policies and cannabis policies were associated with reduced odds of MVC fatalities involving alcohol or cannabis, respectively. Cannabis policies did not affect protective associations between alcohol policies and alcohol involvement. However, more restrictive cannabis policies were protective for co-involvement of alcohol and cannabis.

改变国家大麻政策与酒精政策有效性和酒精或大麻参与机动车死亡的关系。
酒精使用是机动车碰撞(MVCs)和碰撞死亡的一个公认的重要危险因素。美国各州大麻政策的自由化可能会影响涉及酒精或酒精和大麻共同使用的MVC死亡人数。方法:死亡率数据来自2010-2019年50个州和华盛顿特区的死亡率分析报告系统。在多变量混合逻辑回归模型中,使用州年度酒精政策评分(APS)和大麻政策评分(CPS)作为政策暴露的度量,以估计两个血液酒精浓度(BAC)阈值和/或任何可检测到的四氢大麻酚与车祸死亡的关系的调整优势比(AOR)。结果:在完全调整的模型中,APS增加10个百分点(代表更稳健的酒精控制政策)与BAC降低6.3% (0.0.00% (AOR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.886-0.991)或BAC≥0.08% (AOR: 0.938, 95 CI: 0.888-0.992)的风险相关。然而,CPS和酗酒之间没有明显的独立联系。CPS增加10个百分点(代表更强有力的大麻控制政策)与大麻参与(AOR: 0.956, 95% CI: 0.922, 0.991)或酒精和大麻共同参与(AOR: 0.962, 95% CI: 0.928, 0.997)的几率降低相关。结论:更严格的酒精政策和大麻政策分别与涉及酒精或大麻的MVC死亡几率降低有关。大麻政策不影响酒精政策与酒精参与之间的保护性联系。然而,更严格的大麻政策对酒精和大麻的共同参与起到了保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信