Meal plan inclusions and exclusions in the inpatient, outpatient and community setting for adolescent and adult eating disorder care: a scoping review.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Cassandra Bendall, Jacinta Winderlich, Alice Anderson, Michelle Caughey, Jamie Hoy, Jacinta Coleman, Christie Jane Bennett
{"title":"Meal plan inclusions and exclusions in the inpatient, outpatient and community setting for adolescent and adult eating disorder care: a scoping review.","authors":"Cassandra Bendall, Jacinta Winderlich, Alice Anderson, Michelle Caughey, Jamie Hoy, Jacinta Coleman, Christie Jane Bennett","doi":"10.1186/s40337-025-01410-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Minimal research has been conducted on meal plan food exclusions and there is limited evidence to guide introduction of feared foods in eating disorder treatment. This scoping review aimed to explore the evidence on food inclusion and exclusions in inpatient, outpatient, and community settings for adolescents and adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Scoping Review guidelines. All English language primary research studies from the earliest time point exploring meal plan exclusions in people aged > 12 years old with an eating disorder were included. The search was conducted in January 2025 in six databases with no date limits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3693 studies screened, eight studies were included. Non-randomised intervention studies comprised 50% (n = 4), 62% (n = 5) of studies involved consumers and 38% (n = 3) were clinician-led. Clinician-led practices varied with most permitting exclusions for religious or medical reasons i.e. allergy, or lifelong dislikes. Vegetarianism and veganism were inconsistently permitted amongst clinicians. Various meal planning approaches were utilised to improve dietary variety including meal preparation (n = 1), menu planning (n = 2), and food cards (n = 2) in consumer-led studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review outlined the various approaches utilised in meal plan exclusion rationale across inpatient, outpatient, and community settings. Findings highlight there is limited literature exploring meal plan exclusion rationale in the treatment of eating disorders. Of the available literature, no consensus could be concluded due to high heterogeneity. Evidence-based practice recommendations for meal plan exclusions should be included in future eating disorder guidelines to facilitate consistency in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"220"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01410-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Minimal research has been conducted on meal plan food exclusions and there is limited evidence to guide introduction of feared foods in eating disorder treatment. This scoping review aimed to explore the evidence on food inclusion and exclusions in inpatient, outpatient, and community settings for adolescents and adults.

Methods: A scoping review was performed and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Scoping Review guidelines. All English language primary research studies from the earliest time point exploring meal plan exclusions in people aged > 12 years old with an eating disorder were included. The search was conducted in January 2025 in six databases with no date limits.

Results: Of the 3693 studies screened, eight studies were included. Non-randomised intervention studies comprised 50% (n = 4), 62% (n = 5) of studies involved consumers and 38% (n = 3) were clinician-led. Clinician-led practices varied with most permitting exclusions for religious or medical reasons i.e. allergy, or lifelong dislikes. Vegetarianism and veganism were inconsistently permitted amongst clinicians. Various meal planning approaches were utilised to improve dietary variety including meal preparation (n = 1), menu planning (n = 2), and food cards (n = 2) in consumer-led studies.

Conclusion: This review outlined the various approaches utilised in meal plan exclusion rationale across inpatient, outpatient, and community settings. Findings highlight there is limited literature exploring meal plan exclusion rationale in the treatment of eating disorders. Of the available literature, no consensus could be concluded due to high heterogeneity. Evidence-based practice recommendations for meal plan exclusions should be included in future eating disorder guidelines to facilitate consistency in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

青少年和成人饮食失调治疗的住院、门诊和社区环境中膳食计划的纳入和排除:范围综述
背景/目的:对饮食计划食物排除的研究很少,在饮食失调治疗中引入恐惧食物的指导证据有限。本综述旨在探讨青少年和成人住院、门诊和社区环境中食物纳入和排除的证据。方法:根据系统和范围审查指南的首选报告项目进行范围审查并报告。从最早的时间点开始,所有以英语为母语的主要研究都包括了在4 - 12岁患有饮食失调症的人群中探索饮食计划排除的研究。这项研究于2025年1月在六个数据库中进行,没有日期限制。结果:在筛选的3693项研究中,纳入了8项研究。非随机干预研究包括50% (n = 4)、62% (n = 5)涉及消费者的研究和38% (n = 3)由临床医生主导的研究。临床医生主导的实践各不相同,大多数允许因宗教或医学原因(如过敏或终身厌恶)而排除。在临床医生中,素食主义和纯素食主义是不一致的。在消费者主导的研究中,各种膳食计划方法被用于改善膳食多样性,包括膳食准备(n = 1)、菜单计划(n = 2)和食物卡(n = 2)。结论:本综述概述了在住院、门诊和社区环境中膳食计划排除原理中使用的各种方法。研究结果强调,研究饮食计划排除治疗饮食失调的基本原理的文献有限。在现有的文献中,由于高度异质性,无法得出共识。饮食计划排除的循证实践建议应纳入未来的饮食失调指南,以促进临床实践的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信