Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen, Renate Slang, Anna Pauline Pedersen, Helene Matri, Malin H Westerlund, Trine Hovland, Kristin Myhre
{"title":"An educational intervention to bridge the gap between nurses and nurse assistants- a focus group study in Norway.","authors":"Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen, Renate Slang, Anna Pauline Pedersen, Helene Matri, Malin H Westerlund, Trine Hovland, Kristin Myhre","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03909-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have found that a mixed staffing model where nurses and nurse assistants work as a team can deliver better care quality than standard nurse staffing models. However, there are issues related to communication gaps, unclear job descriptions, hierarchical barriers, resource limitations, cultural and systemic factors that need to be solved. The aim of the current study was to explore nurses' and nurse assistants' experiences with an educational intervention to bridge the gap between nurses and nurse assistants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The educational intervention involved nurses and nurse assistants and comprised a lecture of 90 min, followed by 60 min of simulation in the respective subject 'respiratory issues' and 'sepsis'. A qualitative study design, with six focus group interviews (N = 23), was used. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis in-line with recommendations from Braun and Clarke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through analysis, two themes were identified, namely (1) Simulation; a love-hate relationship and (2) Increased insight into each other's competence and understanding of each other's focus. Both nurses and nurse assistants were sceptic to simulation as an educational intervention. However, all appreciated the combination of theory and simulation. The level seemed appropriate for nurse assistants, while nurses perceived the level as mostly repetition. The education day increased insight into each other's competence and understanding of each other's focus across wards and specialties, and across nurses and nurse assistants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Educational interventions between nurses and nurse assistants may be appropriate to decrease communication and collaboration gaps across occupations. Combining theoretical lectures and simulations also seemed to support this.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"1261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03909-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Studies have found that a mixed staffing model where nurses and nurse assistants work as a team can deliver better care quality than standard nurse staffing models. However, there are issues related to communication gaps, unclear job descriptions, hierarchical barriers, resource limitations, cultural and systemic factors that need to be solved. The aim of the current study was to explore nurses' and nurse assistants' experiences with an educational intervention to bridge the gap between nurses and nurse assistants.
Methods: The educational intervention involved nurses and nurse assistants and comprised a lecture of 90 min, followed by 60 min of simulation in the respective subject 'respiratory issues' and 'sepsis'. A qualitative study design, with six focus group interviews (N = 23), was used. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis in-line with recommendations from Braun and Clarke.
Results: Through analysis, two themes were identified, namely (1) Simulation; a love-hate relationship and (2) Increased insight into each other's competence and understanding of each other's focus. Both nurses and nurse assistants were sceptic to simulation as an educational intervention. However, all appreciated the combination of theory and simulation. The level seemed appropriate for nurse assistants, while nurses perceived the level as mostly repetition. The education day increased insight into each other's competence and understanding of each other's focus across wards and specialties, and across nurses and nurse assistants.
Conclusions: Educational interventions between nurses and nurse assistants may be appropriate to decrease communication and collaboration gaps across occupations. Combining theoretical lectures and simulations also seemed to support this.
期刊介绍:
BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.