Digital and traditional arts for inpatients with dementia: a feasibility study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Greg Windle, Daisy Fancourt, Claire Goodman, Nigel Smeeton
{"title":"Digital and traditional arts for inpatients with dementia: a feasibility study.","authors":"Greg Windle, Daisy Fancourt, Claire Goodman, Nigel Smeeton","doi":"10.1080/17533015.2025.2565209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arts-in-health interventions increasingly demonstrate feasibility and effectiveness in improving anxiety and wellbeing outcomes through engagement by hospital inpatients with dementia. We aimed to demonstrate the practicality of digital and traditional group artmaking and understand potential impact on patient anxiety and wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 3-arm controlled study design included control, traditional artmaking and digital artmaking groups. Outcome measures were State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Generic Wellbeing Questionnaire and Observational Measure of Engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We measured a decline in anxiety among the traditional art group (<i>n</i> = 30), with no change among the digital artmaking group (<i>n</i> = 30) or control group (<i>n</i> = 30). We measured positive wellbeing among both intervention groups, but not the control group. Engagement attitude was more positive in the traditional group than the digital group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that group arts engagement was a feasible and promising intervention. We raise further questions for expanded uses of digital tablets in activities for hospital inpatients with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45944,"journal":{"name":"Arts & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2025.2565209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arts-in-health interventions increasingly demonstrate feasibility and effectiveness in improving anxiety and wellbeing outcomes through engagement by hospital inpatients with dementia. We aimed to demonstrate the practicality of digital and traditional group artmaking and understand potential impact on patient anxiety and wellbeing.

Methods: The 3-arm controlled study design included control, traditional artmaking and digital artmaking groups. Outcome measures were State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Generic Wellbeing Questionnaire and Observational Measure of Engagement.

Results: We measured a decline in anxiety among the traditional art group (n = 30), with no change among the digital artmaking group (n = 30) or control group (n = 30). We measured positive wellbeing among both intervention groups, but not the control group. Engagement attitude was more positive in the traditional group than the digital group.

Conclusions: We found that group arts engagement was a feasible and promising intervention. We raise further questions for expanded uses of digital tablets in activities for hospital inpatients with dementia.

住院痴呆症患者的数字和传统艺术:可行性研究。
背景:通过住院痴呆患者的参与,健康艺术干预越来越多地证明了在改善焦虑和健康结果方面的可行性和有效性。我们的目的是展示数字和传统群体艺术创作的实用性,并了解对患者焦虑和健康的潜在影响。方法:三臂对照研究设计分为对照组、传统艺术创作组和数字艺术创作组。结果测量为状态-特质焦虑量表、一般幸福感问卷和敬业度观察测量。结果:我们测量了传统艺术组(n = 30)的焦虑程度下降,而数字艺术创作组(n = 30)或对照组(n = 30)没有变化。我们测量了两个干预组的积极幸福感,但对照组没有。传统组的参与态度比数字组更积极。结论:我们发现团体艺术参与是一种可行且有希望的干预措施。我们提出进一步的问题,扩大使用数字平板电脑在活动的住院痴呆症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts & Health
Arts & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书