Utilization of sequential model-based optimizer integrated machine learning models in correlation of famotidine solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hadil Faris Alotaibi, Chou-Yi Hsu, Fadhil Faez Sead, Anupam Yadav, Renuka S Jyothi, Swati Mishra, Bilakshan Purohit, Egambergan Khudaynazarov, Murodjon Yaxshimuratov, Ashish Singh Chauhan
{"title":"Utilization of sequential model-based optimizer integrated machine learning models in correlation of famotidine solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide.","authors":"Hadil Faris Alotaibi, Chou-Yi Hsu, Fadhil Faez Sead, Anupam Yadav, Renuka S Jyothi, Swati Mishra, Bilakshan Purohit, Egambergan Khudaynazarov, Murodjon Yaxshimuratov, Ashish Singh Chauhan","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-19491-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated solubility variations of a medication in supercritical carbon dioxide with an insight into preparation of nanomedicines with improved aqueous solubility. As the case study, the solubility of famotidine (FAM) medicine in sc-CO<sub>2</sub> (supercritical carbon dioxide) was computed as a function of temperature and pressure, with a particular focus on modeling and predicting solubility and sc-CO<sub>2</sub> density. Three regression models with machine learning behavior including Quadratic Polynomial Regression (QPR), Weighted Least Squares (WLS), and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) were employed to analyze the data, and Sequential Model-Based Optimization (SMBO) was utilized for hyper-parameter tuning. Among these models, the best-performing model for predicting FAM solubility was the QPR model, with an impressive coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.95858 for all sets including training and validation. Additionally, QPR exhibited low MAPE of 1.64278E + 00, RMSE of 9.6833E-02, and a maximum error of 1.49480E-01, while exhibiting a higher maximum error of 18.99 kg/m³ for density predictions, indicating areas for potential improvement. These results highlight the accuracy and precision of the QPR model in predicting FAM solubility in sc-CO<sub>2</sub>. For the prediction of sc-CO<sub>2</sub> density, QPR again proved to be the most effective model with a remarkable R<sup>2</sup> score of 0.99733. This model achieved a low MAPE of 1.06004E-02, RMSE of 8.4072E + 00, and a maximum error of 1.89894E + 01. The QPR model demonstrates its exceptional capability in accurately predicting sc-CO<sub>2</sub> density in terms of temperature and pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35555"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19491-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated solubility variations of a medication in supercritical carbon dioxide with an insight into preparation of nanomedicines with improved aqueous solubility. As the case study, the solubility of famotidine (FAM) medicine in sc-CO2 (supercritical carbon dioxide) was computed as a function of temperature and pressure, with a particular focus on modeling and predicting solubility and sc-CO2 density. Three regression models with machine learning behavior including Quadratic Polynomial Regression (QPR), Weighted Least Squares (WLS), and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) were employed to analyze the data, and Sequential Model-Based Optimization (SMBO) was utilized for hyper-parameter tuning. Among these models, the best-performing model for predicting FAM solubility was the QPR model, with an impressive coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.95858 for all sets including training and validation. Additionally, QPR exhibited low MAPE of 1.64278E + 00, RMSE of 9.6833E-02, and a maximum error of 1.49480E-01, while exhibiting a higher maximum error of 18.99 kg/m³ for density predictions, indicating areas for potential improvement. These results highlight the accuracy and precision of the QPR model in predicting FAM solubility in sc-CO2. For the prediction of sc-CO2 density, QPR again proved to be the most effective model with a remarkable R2 score of 0.99733. This model achieved a low MAPE of 1.06004E-02, RMSE of 8.4072E + 00, and a maximum error of 1.89894E + 01. The QPR model demonstrates its exceptional capability in accurately predicting sc-CO2 density in terms of temperature and pressure.

利用基于顺序模型的优化器集成机器学习模型研究法莫替丁在超临界二氧化碳中的溶解度。
我们研究了一种药物在超临界二氧化碳中的溶解度变化,并深入研究了纳米药物的制备方法。作为案例研究,法莫替丁(FAM)药物在sc-CO2(超临界二氧化碳)中的溶解度被计算为温度和压力的函数,特别关注建模和预测溶解度和sc-CO2密度。采用二次多项式回归(QPR)、加权最小二乘(WLS)和正交匹配追踪(OMP)三种具有机器学习行为的回归模型对数据进行分析,并利用序列模型优化(SMBO)进行超参数整定。在这些模型中,预测FAM溶解度的最佳模型是QPR模型,包括训练和验证在内的所有集的决定系数(R2)都达到了令人印象深刻的0.95858。此外,QPR的MAPE较低,为1.64278E + 00, RMSE为9.6833E-02,最大误差为1.49480E-01,而密度预测的最大误差为18.99 kg/m³,表明了有待改进的地方。这些结果突出了QPR模型预测FAM在sc-CO2中的溶解度的准确性和精密度。对于sc-CO2密度的预测,QPR再次被证明是最有效的模型,R2得分为0.99733。该模型的最小MAPE为1.06004E-02, RMSE为8.4072E + 00,最大误差为1.89894E + 01。QPR模型在准确预测温度和压力方面的sc-CO2密度方面具有卓越的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信