{"title":"Association of serum albumin to creatinine ratio with mortality in patients with aortic disease: a cohort study.","authors":"Weihong Zhao","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-19240-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most previous studies have only examined the relationship between albumin or creatinine alone and the prognosis of patients with aortic disease (AD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association between serum albumin to creatinine ratio (sACR) and all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with AD. This retrospective cohort study utilized the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV, stratifying sACR into tertiles. The primary outcome (28-day ACM) and the secondary outcomes in critically ill AD patients were analyzed via restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Survival differences across sACR tertiles were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, supplemented by subgroup interactions and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluation of sACR's prognostic accuracy. This study included 499 AD patients (67.3% male). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with log<sub>10</sub>-transformed sACR revealed each tenfold sACR increase reduced mortality risk by 78% at 28 days (hazard ratio [HR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.40), 78% at 90 days (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13-0.37), and 74% at 1 year (HR 0.26, 0.17-0.42; all P < 0.001). Restricted cubic splines confirmed linear dose-response relationships (P for non-linear > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly lower mortality in high sACR tertiles, consistent across subgroups. ROC analysis validated prognostic accuracy. sACR was negatively associated with both short- and long-term mortality in patients with AD. These findings advance prognostic biomarker research by confirming sACR's clinical utility in AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35437"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19240-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most previous studies have only examined the relationship between albumin or creatinine alone and the prognosis of patients with aortic disease (AD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association between serum albumin to creatinine ratio (sACR) and all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with AD. This retrospective cohort study utilized the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV, stratifying sACR into tertiles. The primary outcome (28-day ACM) and the secondary outcomes in critically ill AD patients were analyzed via restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Survival differences across sACR tertiles were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, supplemented by subgroup interactions and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluation of sACR's prognostic accuracy. This study included 499 AD patients (67.3% male). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with log10-transformed sACR revealed each tenfold sACR increase reduced mortality risk by 78% at 28 days (hazard ratio [HR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.40), 78% at 90 days (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13-0.37), and 74% at 1 year (HR 0.26, 0.17-0.42; all P < 0.001). Restricted cubic splines confirmed linear dose-response relationships (P for non-linear > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly lower mortality in high sACR tertiles, consistent across subgroups. ROC analysis validated prognostic accuracy. sACR was negatively associated with both short- and long-term mortality in patients with AD. These findings advance prognostic biomarker research by confirming sACR's clinical utility in AD.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.