Defining critical symptom parameters for an ePRO-based management pathway during systemic treatment for advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer: a longitudinal study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xin Shelley Wang, Mariela Blum Murphy, Shu-En Shen, Elizabeth Letona, Laila Noor, Charles S Cleeland
{"title":"Defining critical symptom parameters for an ePRO-based management pathway during systemic treatment for advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Xin Shelley Wang, Mariela Blum Murphy, Shu-En Shen, Elizabeth Letona, Laila Noor, Charles S Cleeland","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04075-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Establishing a care pathway based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) is necessary to effectively assess and manage outpatients undergoing active treatment. This study investigated symptom burden in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer and the characteristics needed for implementing an ePRO system to monitor these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic UGI cancer rated symptom severity and functional impairment by completing the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) repeatedly for 12 months. Group-based trajectory analysis classified patients into a high-severity symptom group if their symptoms were consistently rated higher than other patients' symptoms over time. A composite score of the most-severe symptoms was calculated and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 111 enrollees, 92 patients (esophageal, 35%; gastroesophageal junction, 25%; gastric, 40%) provided PRO data at baseline plus at least the first 2 weeks of treatment. More than 55% of patients were in the high-severity group for fatigue, lack of appetite, numbness/tingling, and drowsiness, and more than 33% were in the high-severity symptom for inability to eat, nausea, pain, and disturbed sleep. A composite score of these 8 symptoms (45% in the high-severity symptom group; mean 4.5, median 4.4) was associated with poorer quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world longitudinal study, 45% of patients with advanced UGI reported 8 disease- or treatment-specific symptoms that were persistently more severe over time. This provides a rationale for implementing ePRO-based routine assessment and management of this patient cohort during systemic therapy, especially during the first 12 weeks of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04075-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Establishing a care pathway based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) is necessary to effectively assess and manage outpatients undergoing active treatment. This study investigated symptom burden in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer and the characteristics needed for implementing an ePRO system to monitor these patients.

Methods: Patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic UGI cancer rated symptom severity and functional impairment by completing the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) repeatedly for 12 months. Group-based trajectory analysis classified patients into a high-severity symptom group if their symptoms were consistently rated higher than other patients' symptoms over time. A composite score of the most-severe symptoms was calculated and evaluated.

Results: Of 111 enrollees, 92 patients (esophageal, 35%; gastroesophageal junction, 25%; gastric, 40%) provided PRO data at baseline plus at least the first 2 weeks of treatment. More than 55% of patients were in the high-severity group for fatigue, lack of appetite, numbness/tingling, and drowsiness, and more than 33% were in the high-severity symptom for inability to eat, nausea, pain, and disturbed sleep. A composite score of these 8 symptoms (45% in the high-severity symptom group; mean 4.5, median 4.4) was associated with poorer quality of life.

Conclusion: In this real-world longitudinal study, 45% of patients with advanced UGI reported 8 disease- or treatment-specific symptoms that were persistently more severe over time. This provides a rationale for implementing ePRO-based routine assessment and management of this patient cohort during systemic therapy, especially during the first 12 weeks of treatment.

在晚期上消化道癌症的全身治疗中,为基于epro的管理途径定义关键症状参数:一项纵向研究。
目的:建立基于电子患者报告结果(ePROs)的护理路径是有效评估和管理门诊积极治疗患者的必要条件。本研究调查了晚期上消化道(UGI)癌症患者的症状负担以及实施ePRO系统监测这些患者所需的特征。方法:接受转移性UGI癌症全身治疗的患者通过重复完成MD安德森胃肠道肿瘤症状量表(MDASI-GI),对症状严重程度和功能损害进行评分,持续12个月。基于组的轨迹分析将患者分类为高严重症状组,如果他们的症状随着时间的推移一直被评为高于其他患者的症状。计算并评估最严重症状的综合评分。结果:在111名入组者中,92名患者(食管,35%;胃食管交界处,25%;胃,40%)提供了基线和至少前2周治疗时的PRO数据。超过55%的患者处于疲劳、食欲不振、麻木/刺痛和嗜睡的高严重症状组,超过33%的患者处于无法进食、恶心、疼痛和睡眠紊乱的高严重症状组。这8种症状的综合评分(高严重症状组为45%,平均4.5分,中位数4.4分)与较差的生活质量相关。结论:在这项真实世界的纵向研究中,45%的晚期UGI患者报告了8种疾病或治疗特异性症状,这些症状随着时间的推移持续加重。这为在全身治疗期间,特别是在治疗的前12周,对该患者队列实施基于epro的常规评估和管理提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信