{"title":"A jamming risk warning model for TBM tunnelling based on Bayesian statistical methods.","authors":"Shuang-Jing Wang, Le-Chen Wang, Lei-Jie Wu, Xu Li","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-19244-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents a comprehensive jamming risk assessment framework for Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) jamming accidents during excavation. Using real-time boring data and Bayesian conditional probability, a novel risk warning model is proposed to enhance safety and efficiency of tunneling projects. Through statistical analysis of excavation parameters, distinct patterns between jamming and normal excavation states are identified. A comprehensive jamming perception index (η) is introduced that synthesizes multiple parameters to accurately identify jamming states with a recognition rate of 95%. This integrated approach overcomes the limitations of single-parameter analysis and provides improved accuracy in jamming risk assessment. Additionally, a quantitative model for calculating jamming probability is developed, accounting for differences in sample size between jamming and normal excavation sections. The refined model yields realistic estimates of jamming probability, with an average of 94% in jamming sections and 7% in normal excavation sections. Furthermore, geological analysis shows that the Class Ⅲ surrounding rock is the most suitable for excavation and has the lowest jamming probability. This finding emphasizes the importance of considering geological conditions in excavation planning to effectively mitigate jamming risks. In conclusion, this research provides a practical framework for the prediction and management of TBM jamming accidents, contributing to enhanced safety and efficiency in tunneling projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19244-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive jamming risk assessment framework for Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) jamming accidents during excavation. Using real-time boring data and Bayesian conditional probability, a novel risk warning model is proposed to enhance safety and efficiency of tunneling projects. Through statistical analysis of excavation parameters, distinct patterns between jamming and normal excavation states are identified. A comprehensive jamming perception index (η) is introduced that synthesizes multiple parameters to accurately identify jamming states with a recognition rate of 95%. This integrated approach overcomes the limitations of single-parameter analysis and provides improved accuracy in jamming risk assessment. Additionally, a quantitative model for calculating jamming probability is developed, accounting for differences in sample size between jamming and normal excavation sections. The refined model yields realistic estimates of jamming probability, with an average of 94% in jamming sections and 7% in normal excavation sections. Furthermore, geological analysis shows that the Class Ⅲ surrounding rock is the most suitable for excavation and has the lowest jamming probability. This finding emphasizes the importance of considering geological conditions in excavation planning to effectively mitigate jamming risks. In conclusion, this research provides a practical framework for the prediction and management of TBM jamming accidents, contributing to enhanced safety and efficiency in tunneling projects.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.