Outcomes of preterm infants stabilized with flow-inflating bag or T-piece resuscitator at birth-a Canadian neonatal network cohort study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Melanie Shaker, Jennifer Toye, Eugene Ng, Ruben Alvaro, Ayman Sheta, Deepak Louis, Joseph Y Ting, Marc Beltempo, Georg M Schmölzer
{"title":"Outcomes of preterm infants stabilized with flow-inflating bag or T-piece resuscitator at birth-a Canadian neonatal network cohort study.","authors":"Melanie Shaker, Jennifer Toye, Eugene Ng, Ruben Alvaro, Ayman Sheta, Deepak Louis, Joseph Y Ting, Marc Beltempo, Georg M Schmölzer","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-04467-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the outcomes of premature infants stabilized in the delivery room using either the T-piece resuscitator (TPR) or flow-inflating bag (FIB).</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>Data from five participating level III NICUs within the Canadian Neonatal Network were reviewed. Infants born between 24<sup>+0</sup> and 29<sup>+6</sup> weeks' gestational age (GA) from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, receiving mask ventilation in the delivery room were included. Infants who were outborn or had major congenital abnormalities were excluded. The primary composite outcome was death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or severe neurologic injury (intraventricular hemorrhage grade III-IV or periventricular leukomalacia). Logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate odds ratios with 95% CI for the association with exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2007 infants admitted to participating sites, 426 were excluded, leaving 1581 who met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome occurred in 367/745 (49%) infants with the FIB and in 438/836 (52%) infants with the TPR (adjusted OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.71). There was no association between TPR or FIB with the individual components of the composite outcome (death, BPD, and severe neurological injury).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant differences in the outcomes of preterm infants stabilized in the delivery room with TPR compared to FIB.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>No significant difference in the composite outcome (death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and severe neurological injury) between a flow-inflating bag (FIB) or a T-piece resuscitator (TPR) for respiratory support at birth. Large real-world analyses comparing TPR and FIB in clinical settings. Respiratory support with either device resulted in no statistically different key clinical outcomes. There was no impact on mechanical ventilation or major morbidities with either device. This emphasizes the importance of provider experience and consistent device use over the choice of resuscitation device.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04467-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare the outcomes of premature infants stabilized in the delivery room using either the T-piece resuscitator (TPR) or flow-inflating bag (FIB).

Design/methods: Data from five participating level III NICUs within the Canadian Neonatal Network were reviewed. Infants born between 24+0 and 29+6 weeks' gestational age (GA) from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, receiving mask ventilation in the delivery room were included. Infants who were outborn or had major congenital abnormalities were excluded. The primary composite outcome was death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or severe neurologic injury (intraventricular hemorrhage grade III-IV or periventricular leukomalacia). Logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate odds ratios with 95% CI for the association with exposure.

Results: Of the 2007 infants admitted to participating sites, 426 were excluded, leaving 1581 who met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome occurred in 367/745 (49%) infants with the FIB and in 438/836 (52%) infants with the TPR (adjusted OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.71). There was no association between TPR or FIB with the individual components of the composite outcome (death, BPD, and severe neurological injury).

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the outcomes of preterm infants stabilized in the delivery room with TPR compared to FIB.

Impact: No significant difference in the composite outcome (death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and severe neurological injury) between a flow-inflating bag (FIB) or a T-piece resuscitator (TPR) for respiratory support at birth. Large real-world analyses comparing TPR and FIB in clinical settings. Respiratory support with either device resulted in no statistically different key clinical outcomes. There was no impact on mechanical ventilation or major morbidities with either device. This emphasizes the importance of provider experience and consistent device use over the choice of resuscitation device.

一项加拿大新生儿网络队列研究:出生时使用流量充气袋或t件式复苏器稳定早产儿的结局。
背景:比较使用t片式复苏器(TPR)和流量充气袋(FIB)在产房稳定的早产儿的结局。设计/方法:对加拿大新生儿网络中5个III级新生儿重症监护病房的数据进行回顾。纳入2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日在产房接受口罩通气的24+0 ~ 29+6周胎龄(GA)婴儿。未出生或有重大先天性异常的婴儿被排除在外。主要复合结局为死亡或支气管肺发育不良(BPD)或严重神经损伤(III-IV级脑室内出血或脑室周围白质软化)。对潜在混杂因素进行调整后的Logistic回归模型用于估计与暴露相关的95% CI的比值比。结果:在2007名进入参与站点的婴儿中,426名被排除,剩下1581名符合纳入标准。主要结局发生在367/745例FIB患儿(49%)和438/836例TPR患儿(52%)(调整后OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.44 - 1.71)。TPR或FIB与复合结局的单个组成部分(死亡、BPD和严重神经损伤)之间没有关联。结论:与FIB相比,TPR在产房稳定的早产儿的结局没有显著差异。影响:出生时使用流量充气袋(FIB)或t片式复苏器(TPR)进行呼吸支持,在复合结局(死亡、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)和严重神经损伤)方面无显著差异。大型现实世界分析比较TPR和FIB在临床设置。两种设备的呼吸支持对关键临床结果没有统计学差异。两种设备对机械通气和主要发病率均无影响。这强调了提供者经验和一致的设备使用在复苏设备选择上的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信