Perinatal autopsy reporting practices in Australian stillbirths: a quality review

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Pathology Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.pathol.2025.06.010
Tania Marsden , Teck Yee Khong , Jane E. Dahlstrom , Frances M. Boyle , Mu Cheng , Yin Ping Wong , Stacey Prystupa , Gretchen Pomare , Joanna Perry-Keene , Vicki Flenady , Jessica Sexton
{"title":"Perinatal autopsy reporting practices in Australian stillbirths: a quality review","authors":"Tania Marsden ,&nbsp;Teck Yee Khong ,&nbsp;Jane E. Dahlstrom ,&nbsp;Frances M. Boyle ,&nbsp;Mu Cheng ,&nbsp;Yin Ping Wong ,&nbsp;Stacey Prystupa ,&nbsp;Gretchen Pomare ,&nbsp;Joanna Perry-Keene ,&nbsp;Vicki Flenady ,&nbsp;Jessica Sexton","doi":"10.1016/j.pathol.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stillbirth continues to pose a significant public health challenge. Determining the cause of death is crucial for both prevention and providing closure to families, yet many stillbirths are not adequately investigated. Autopsy and placental assessments are recognised as the gold standard for stillbirth investigation. The utility of these procedures can vary based on the quality of the examination. The aim of this study was to determine the quality of autopsy reporting in Australia in the context of stillbirth. A total of 284 stillbirths with accompanying autopsy reports from 18 maternity hospitals across Australia between 2013 and 2018 were included. Autopsy and placental pathology reports were scored against accepted standards using a modified Vujanic–Khong tool to produce an autopsy quality score (AQS), by a double-blinded panel of assessors to the cause of death. Outcome measures were the number of autopsy reports achieving the score range, with a minimal acceptable score (MAS) of 75%. Reports were assessed based on the type of investigation (full or external), presenting clinical scenario, maceration status, and gestational age. A secondary outcome was to review the format of the autopsy reports. In total, 248 (87%) autopsy reports achieved a MAS, with 166 (58%) of reports achieving 90% of an AQS; 37 (13%) cases did not achieve a MAS, including 14 external examinations, one partial autopsy examination and 23 full autopsy examinations. Full autopsy achieved a higher score than external examinations only. External autopsy examinations were more likely not to have requested medical imaging (59%), cytogenetics (72%), or microbiology (of the placenta, 72%) when thought to be clinically indicated. There was no difference in the MAS according to clinical scenario, gestational age or degree of maceration. There was no consistent autopsy report format in this study. The overall quality of autopsy reports across Australia is high, providing confidence in the use of these reports for classifying a cause of stillbirth. Development of a structured protocol for autopsy reporting to ensure all investigations deemed clinically appropriate are performed and formatting is harmonised across the country is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19915,"journal":{"name":"Pathology","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302525002648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stillbirth continues to pose a significant public health challenge. Determining the cause of death is crucial for both prevention and providing closure to families, yet many stillbirths are not adequately investigated. Autopsy and placental assessments are recognised as the gold standard for stillbirth investigation. The utility of these procedures can vary based on the quality of the examination. The aim of this study was to determine the quality of autopsy reporting in Australia in the context of stillbirth. A total of 284 stillbirths with accompanying autopsy reports from 18 maternity hospitals across Australia between 2013 and 2018 were included. Autopsy and placental pathology reports were scored against accepted standards using a modified Vujanic–Khong tool to produce an autopsy quality score (AQS), by a double-blinded panel of assessors to the cause of death. Outcome measures were the number of autopsy reports achieving the score range, with a minimal acceptable score (MAS) of 75%. Reports were assessed based on the type of investigation (full or external), presenting clinical scenario, maceration status, and gestational age. A secondary outcome was to review the format of the autopsy reports. In total, 248 (87%) autopsy reports achieved a MAS, with 166 (58%) of reports achieving 90% of an AQS; 37 (13%) cases did not achieve a MAS, including 14 external examinations, one partial autopsy examination and 23 full autopsy examinations. Full autopsy achieved a higher score than external examinations only. External autopsy examinations were more likely not to have requested medical imaging (59%), cytogenetics (72%), or microbiology (of the placenta, 72%) when thought to be clinically indicated. There was no difference in the MAS according to clinical scenario, gestational age or degree of maceration. There was no consistent autopsy report format in this study. The overall quality of autopsy reports across Australia is high, providing confidence in the use of these reports for classifying a cause of stillbirth. Development of a structured protocol for autopsy reporting to ensure all investigations deemed clinically appropriate are performed and formatting is harmonised across the country is recommended.
澳大利亚死产的围产期尸检报告实践:质量回顾。
死产继续对公共卫生构成重大挑战。确定死亡原因对于预防和为家庭提供解决方案至关重要,但许多死产没有得到充分调查。尸检和胎盘评估被认为是死产调查的金标准。这些程序的效用可以根据检查的质量而变化。本研究的目的是确定澳大利亚在死产背景下尸检报告的质量。2013年至2018年期间,澳大利亚18家妇产医院共有284例死产,并附有尸检报告。死因评估双盲小组使用改进的Vujanic-Khong工具对尸检和胎盘病理报告进行评分,以产生尸检质量评分(AQS)。结局指标是达到评分范围的尸检报告数量,最低可接受评分(MAS)为75%。根据调查类型(全面或外部)、临床情况、浸渍状态和胎龄对报告进行评估。第二个结果是审查尸检报告的格式。共有248份(87%)尸检报告达到了MAS, 166份(58%)报告达到了90%的AQS;37例(13%)未达到MAS,包括14例外部检查,1例部分尸检和23例完全尸检。全面尸检的评分高于单纯的外部检查。当认为有临床指征时,外部尸检检查更有可能没有要求医学影像学(59%)、细胞遗传学(72%)或微生物学(胎盘,72%)。根据临床情况、胎龄或浸渍程度,MAS无差异。在本研究中没有一致的尸检报告格式。尸检报告的整体质量在澳大利亚是高的,为使用这些报告分类死产的原因提供了信心。建议制定尸检报告的结构化协议,以确保所有临床认为适当的调查都得到执行,并在全国范围内统一格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathology
Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
459
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Published by Elsevier from 2016 Pathology is the official journal of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). It is committed to publishing peer-reviewed, original articles related to the science of pathology in its broadest sense, including anatomical pathology, chemical pathology and biochemistry, cytopathology, experimental pathology, forensic pathology and morbid anatomy, genetics, haematology, immunology and immunopathology, microbiology and molecular pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书