Subgroup analysis of pipeline Flow-Diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A long-term real-world study involving 190 patients.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Huiwei Liu, Wenfeng Feng, Sheng Guan, Tianxiao Li, Guohua Mao, Aisha Maimaitili, Yongjie Ma, Donghai Wang, Ming Ye, Hongqi Zhang, Peng Zhang
{"title":"Subgroup analysis of pipeline Flow-Diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A long-term real-world study involving 190 patients.","authors":"Huiwei Liu, Wenfeng Feng, Sheng Guan, Tianxiao Li, Guohua Mao, Aisha Maimaitili, Yongjie Ma, Donghai Wang, Ming Ye, Hongqi Zhang, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03830-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Pipeline is currently the most widely used flow-diverting device worldwide, yet research on its long-term efficacy remains limited, primarily based on small to medium-sized sample cohorts. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Pipeline device in treating intracranial aneurysms. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with long-term incomplete occlusion of the aneurysm and stenosis of the parent artery. This multicenter retrospective study included patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline flow-diverting device between 2015 and 2020. The analysis encompassed clinical and imaging outcomes, including clinical presentation, comorbidities, aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and postoperative follow-up data. This study included 190 patients(122 females)with a mean age of 54.6 ± 11.7 years and 204 aneurysms. At one year postoperatively, the complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 69.9%, parent artery stenosis was 3.7%, and complications occurred in 3.3% of cases. During long-term follow-up, the occlusion rate increased to 93.1%, stenosis rose to 6.4%, and complications decreased to 2.1%. Three perforator occlusions were reported: two during the short-term follow-up and one during the long-term follow-up, resulting in severe impairment (mRS 4). The Pipeline flow-diverting device demonstrated favorable long-term safety and efficacy in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, with no significant differences in safety or effectiveness between vertebral artery aneurysms and anterior circulation aneurysms. Statistical analysis identified advanced age and male gender as risk factors for long-term incomplete occlusion. Furthermore, the results suggest that postoperative antiplatelet therapy and imaging follow-up were continued for only one year, which is considered safe and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03830-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Pipeline is currently the most widely used flow-diverting device worldwide, yet research on its long-term efficacy remains limited, primarily based on small to medium-sized sample cohorts. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Pipeline device in treating intracranial aneurysms. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with long-term incomplete occlusion of the aneurysm and stenosis of the parent artery. This multicenter retrospective study included patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline flow-diverting device between 2015 and 2020. The analysis encompassed clinical and imaging outcomes, including clinical presentation, comorbidities, aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and postoperative follow-up data. This study included 190 patients(122 females)with a mean age of 54.6 ± 11.7 years and 204 aneurysms. At one year postoperatively, the complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 69.9%, parent artery stenosis was 3.7%, and complications occurred in 3.3% of cases. During long-term follow-up, the occlusion rate increased to 93.1%, stenosis rose to 6.4%, and complications decreased to 2.1%. Three perforator occlusions were reported: two during the short-term follow-up and one during the long-term follow-up, resulting in severe impairment (mRS 4). The Pipeline flow-diverting device demonstrated favorable long-term safety and efficacy in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, with no significant differences in safety or effectiveness between vertebral artery aneurysms and anterior circulation aneurysms. Statistical analysis identified advanced age and male gender as risk factors for long-term incomplete occlusion. Furthermore, the results suggest that postoperative antiplatelet therapy and imaging follow-up were continued for only one year, which is considered safe and effective.

管道分流装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的亚组分析:一项涉及190例患者的长期现实研究。
管道是目前世界上使用最广泛的分流装置,但对其长期疗效的研究仍然有限,主要基于中小型样本队列。本研究的目的是评估管道装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的长期安全性和有效性。此外,本研究旨在分析与动脉瘤长期不完全闭塞和载动脉狭窄相关的危险因素。这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2015年至2020年间使用管道分流装置治疗的颅内动脉瘤患者。分析包括临床和影像学结果,包括临床表现、合并症、动脉瘤特征、手术细节和术后随访数据。本研究纳入190例患者(女性122例),平均年龄54.6±11.7岁,204个动脉瘤。术后1年,动脉瘤完全闭塞率为69.9%,载动脉狭窄率为3.7%,并发症发生率为3.3%。在长期随访中,闭塞率上升至93.1%,狭窄率上升至6.4%,并发症发生率下降至2.1%。报告了3例穿支闭塞:2例在短期随访中,1例在长期随访中,导致严重损害(mRS 4)。该管道分流装置治疗颅内动脉瘤具有良好的长期安全性和有效性,椎动脉动脉瘤与前循环动脉瘤在安全性和有效性方面无显著差异。统计分析发现高龄和男性是长期不完全闭塞的危险因素。此外,结果表明术后抗血小板治疗和影像学随访仅持续一年,被认为是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信