Quantitative Preoperative Peroneal Vessel Assessment in Fibula Free Flap Surgery.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1055/a-2717-4909
Evan Rothchild, Neginder Saini, Isabelle T Smith, Jina Yom, Joseph A Ricci
{"title":"Quantitative Preoperative Peroneal Vessel Assessment in Fibula Free Flap Surgery.","authors":"Evan Rothchild, Neginder Saini, Isabelle T Smith, Jina Yom, Joseph A Ricci","doi":"10.1055/a-2717-4909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibula free flap (FFF) surgery complications can arise from vascular disease within the donor peroneal artery. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become standard for preoperative evaluation. However, current methods rely on qualitative assessments to determine surgical eligibility. This study aims to improve preoperative risk evaluation by implementing two quantitative scoring systems, the Bollinger score and the lower limb arterial calcification score (LLACS), assessing distinct vascular health components. The Bollinger score quantifies intraluminal stenosis caused by atherosclerotic plaques, while the LLACS quantifies arteriosclerosis by evaluating calcification within the arterial walls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on all head and neck microvascular FFF procedures performed at a university-affiliated tertiary care center between August 2021 and March 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, medical history, operative details, and postoperative complications (infection, hematoma, seroma, fistula, dehiscence, or flap failure) within 90 days. Peroneal artery Bollinger scores and crural segment LLACSs from the donor lower extremity were calculated from preoperative CTAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 patients were included. Increasing Bollinger scores were significantly associated with an increased risk of complications and longer hospital stays, even after controlling for potential confounders. Combining both scores improved risk stratification, with high-risk patients experiencing an 8.36-fold higher risk of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that quantitative preoperative peroneal vessel assessment improves risk stratification for patients undergoing FFF surgery. These scoring systems may enhance patient selection and guide strategies to minimize postoperative complications. Integrating multiple scoring systems is key to the comprehensive assessment of vascular health.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"582-588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2717-4909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fibula free flap (FFF) surgery complications can arise from vascular disease within the donor peroneal artery. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become standard for preoperative evaluation. However, current methods rely on qualitative assessments to determine surgical eligibility. This study aims to improve preoperative risk evaluation by implementing two quantitative scoring systems, the Bollinger score and the lower limb arterial calcification score (LLACS), assessing distinct vascular health components. The Bollinger score quantifies intraluminal stenosis caused by atherosclerotic plaques, while the LLACS quantifies arteriosclerosis by evaluating calcification within the arterial walls.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all head and neck microvascular FFF procedures performed at a university-affiliated tertiary care center between August 2021 and March 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, medical history, operative details, and postoperative complications (infection, hematoma, seroma, fistula, dehiscence, or flap failure) within 90 days. Peroneal artery Bollinger scores and crural segment LLACSs from the donor lower extremity were calculated from preoperative CTAs.

Results: A total of 117 patients were included. Increasing Bollinger scores were significantly associated with an increased risk of complications and longer hospital stays, even after controlling for potential confounders. Combining both scores improved risk stratification, with high-risk patients experiencing an 8.36-fold higher risk of complications.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that quantitative preoperative peroneal vessel assessment improves risk stratification for patients undergoing FFF surgery. These scoring systems may enhance patient selection and guide strategies to minimize postoperative complications. Integrating multiple scoring systems is key to the comprehensive assessment of vascular health.

腓骨游离皮瓣术前腓骨血管定量评估。
背景:腓骨游离皮瓣(FFF)手术并发症可由供体腓动脉内的血管疾病引起。计算机断层血管造影(CTA)已成为术前评估的标准。然而,目前的方法依赖于定性评估来确定手术资格。本研究旨在通过实施Bollinger评分和下肢动脉钙化评分(lacs)两种定量评分系统来评估不同的血管健康成分,从而改进术前风险评估。Bollinger评分量化动脉粥样硬化斑块引起的腔内狭窄,而lacs通过评估动脉壁内的钙化来量化动脉硬化。方法:对2021年8月至2023年3月期间在某大学附属三级医疗中心进行的所有头颈部微血管FFF手术进行回顾性研究。收集的数据包括90天内患者人口统计、病史、手术细节和术后并发症(感染、血肿、血肿、瘘、裂开或皮瓣失败)。根据术前cta计算供体下肢腓动脉Bollinger评分和小腿段llacs。结果:共纳入117例患者。即使在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,Bollinger评分的增加与并发症风险的增加和住院时间的延长显著相关。结合两种评分改善了风险分层,高危患者出现并发症的风险增加了8.36倍。结论:我们的研究结果表明,定量的术前腓血管评估可以改善FFF手术患者的风险分层。这些评分系统可以提高患者的选择和指导策略,以尽量减少术后并发症。综合多个评分系统是血管健康综合评估的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书