Protocols, Complications, and Outcomes of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ian S Reynolds, William P Duggan, Nicholas P McKenna, Amit Merchea, Jürgen Mulsow
{"title":"Protocols, Complications, and Outcomes of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Ian S Reynolds, William P Duggan, Nicholas P McKenna, Amit Merchea, Jürgen Mulsow","doi":"10.1002/jso.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is becoming more frequent for patients with unresectable peritoneal metastases. This systematic review explores the indications, protocols, feasibility, safety, oncological outcomes, patient reported outcomes and quality of life outcomes for patients being treated with PIPAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was undertaken to identify studies pertaining to patients undergoing treatment with PIPAC. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment protocols, safety data, treatment response data and outcome data were extracted from relevant studies and included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1980 patients undergoing 4454 PIPAC procedures for peritoneal metastases from a range of primary cancers was extracted. The treatment protocols identified were relatively homogenous across all studies. Grade 3/4 complications, grade 3/4 toxicity and procedure related mortality occurred infrequently. At least partial histological response was seen in 61.8% of patients. Overall survival for studies presenting data for mixed primary tumors ranged from 8 to 25 months. Quality of life and function were relatively stable throughout treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PIPAC is a safe and feasible treatment option for patients with peritoneal metastases. Ongoing studies are required to evaluate how it compares to best option standard of care chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is becoming more frequent for patients with unresectable peritoneal metastases. This systematic review explores the indications, protocols, feasibility, safety, oncological outcomes, patient reported outcomes and quality of life outcomes for patients being treated with PIPAC.

Methods: A review of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was undertaken to identify studies pertaining to patients undergoing treatment with PIPAC. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment protocols, safety data, treatment response data and outcome data were extracted from relevant studies and included in the analysis.

Results: Data from 1980 patients undergoing 4454 PIPAC procedures for peritoneal metastases from a range of primary cancers was extracted. The treatment protocols identified were relatively homogenous across all studies. Grade 3/4 complications, grade 3/4 toxicity and procedure related mortality occurred infrequently. At least partial histological response was seen in 61.8% of patients. Overall survival for studies presenting data for mixed primary tumors ranged from 8 to 25 months. Quality of life and function were relatively stable throughout treatment.

Conclusions: PIPAC is a safe and feasible treatment option for patients with peritoneal metastases. Ongoing studies are required to evaluate how it compares to best option standard of care chemotherapy.

腹膜转移患者的加压气雾化疗方案、并发症和结果:文献系统综述。
背景:对于无法切除的腹膜转移患者,使用加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)越来越常见。本系统综述探讨了PIPAC治疗患者的适应症、方案、可行性、安全性、肿瘤预后、患者报告的预后和生活质量预后。方法:对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行综述,以确定与接受PIPAC治疗的患者有关的研究。从相关研究中提取临床病理特征、治疗方案、安全性数据、治疗反应数据和结局数据并纳入分析。结果:我们提取了1980例接受4454次PIPAC手术治疗各种原发癌症腹膜转移的患者的数据。所有研究确定的治疗方案相对均匀。3/4级并发症、3/4级毒性和手术相关死亡率很少发生。61.8%的患者至少有部分组织学反应。混合原发肿瘤的总体生存期为8至25个月。在整个治疗过程中,患者的生活质量和功能相对稳定。结论:PIPAC是腹膜转移患者安全可行的治疗方案。需要进行的研究来评估它与最佳选择标准治疗化疗的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信