Quantitative Analysis of the O-RADS Classification Using Ultrasound Scoring Method (USM) and Its Application Significance.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Ju Lu, Chen Cheng, Mu Cheng, Yanduo Gao, Cai Xu, Xiuqin Ji, Jianhua Fan, Wenli Huang, Lipeng Sun, Sheng Zhao
{"title":"Quantitative Analysis of the O-RADS Classification Using Ultrasound Scoring Method (USM) and Its Application Significance.","authors":"Ju Lu, Chen Cheng, Mu Cheng, Yanduo Gao, Cai Xu, Xiuqin Ji, Jianhua Fan, Wenli Huang, Lipeng Sun, Sheng Zhao","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to quantify the O-RADS classification using the ultrasound scoring method (USM) and explore its clinical application value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 205 patients with adnexal tumors (unilateral or bilateral), corresponding to 244 tumor cases, admitted to our hospital from 2018 to 2023. This cohort included 100 patients with malignant tumors (122 malignant lesions, comprising 34 borderline tumors, and 6 malignant tumors of the fallopian tubes) and 105 patients with benign tumors (122 benign lesions). All cases were confirmed by preoperative ultrasound examination and postoperative pathology. A senior ultrasound physician performed the O-RADS classification, while another ultrasound physician applied the USM. The scores were manually assigned, and the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the USM and O-RADS classification in the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors were determined through ROC curve analysis. The Delong test was used in R to compare the diagnostic performance of the two diagnostic methods. The optimal range of scores between different categories of O-RADS was calculated using by ROC curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the USM (when the optimal cut-off value was ≥ 14 points) in the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors were 0.951, 0.877, and 0.975 (95% CI: 0.960-0.990). The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of O-RADS classification (when the optimal cut-off value was ≥ 4 categories) in the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors were 0.984, 0.887, and 0.973 (95% CI: 0.955-0.992). The AUC comparison between O-RADS classification and USM revealed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.87, p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the USM and the O-RADS classification exhibit high diagnostic efficacy in the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors. The quantification of O-RADS categories using the USM provides a more intuitive and convenient approach, suitable for ultrasound physicians at all levels. This method demonstrates strong generalizability and can effectively guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to quantify the O-RADS classification using the ultrasound scoring method (USM) and explore its clinical application value.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 205 patients with adnexal tumors (unilateral or bilateral), corresponding to 244 tumor cases, admitted to our hospital from 2018 to 2023. This cohort included 100 patients with malignant tumors (122 malignant lesions, comprising 34 borderline tumors, and 6 malignant tumors of the fallopian tubes) and 105 patients with benign tumors (122 benign lesions). All cases were confirmed by preoperative ultrasound examination and postoperative pathology. A senior ultrasound physician performed the O-RADS classification, while another ultrasound physician applied the USM. The scores were manually assigned, and the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the USM and O-RADS classification in the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors were determined through ROC curve analysis. The Delong test was used in R to compare the diagnostic performance of the two diagnostic methods. The optimal range of scores between different categories of O-RADS was calculated using by ROC curve.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the USM (when the optimal cut-off value was ≥ 14 points) in the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors were 0.951, 0.877, and 0.975 (95% CI: 0.960-0.990). The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of O-RADS classification (when the optimal cut-off value was ≥ 4 categories) in the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors were 0.984, 0.887, and 0.973 (95% CI: 0.955-0.992). The AUC comparison between O-RADS classification and USM revealed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.87, p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Both the USM and the O-RADS classification exhibit high diagnostic efficacy in the differential diagnosis of adnexal tumors. The quantification of O-RADS categories using the USM provides a more intuitive and convenient approach, suitable for ultrasound physicians at all levels. This method demonstrates strong generalizability and can effectively guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.

超声评分法(USM)对O-RADS分类的定量分析及其应用意义。
目的:应用超声评分法(USM)量化O-RADS分级,探讨其临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2018 - 2023年我院收治的205例(单侧或双侧)附件肿瘤患者,对应244例肿瘤病例。本队列包括100例恶性肿瘤患者(122个恶性病变,其中交界性肿瘤34例,输卵管恶性肿瘤6例)和105例良性肿瘤患者(122个良性病变)。所有病例均经术前超声检查及术后病理证实。一名资深超声医生进行O-RADS分类,另一名超声医生应用USM。人工评分,通过ROC曲线分析确定USM和O-RADS分类在附件肿瘤鉴别诊断中的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。在R中使用Delong检验来比较两种诊断方法的诊断性能。采用ROC曲线计算不同类别O-RADS之间的最佳评分范围。结果:超声超声(最佳截断值≥14点)鉴别诊断附件肿瘤的灵敏度、特异度和AUC分别为0.951、0.877和0.975 (95% CI: 0.960 ~ 0.990)。O-RADS分类(最佳截断值≥4类)对附件肿瘤鉴别诊断的敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为0.984、0.887和0.973 (95% CI: 0.955 ~ 0.992)。O-RADS分型与USM的AUC比较,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.87, p < 0.05)。结论:超声超声与O-RADS分型对附件肿瘤的鉴别诊断均有较高的诊断效果。使用USM对O-RADS分类进行量化提供了一种更直观和方便的方法,适用于各级超声医生。该方法通用性强,能有效指导临床诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信