Post-mortem fundus examination after sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI): can we do better? a study based on the French SUDI registry.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Romain Provost, Jean- Baptiste Ducloyer, Caroline Rambaud, Christele Gras-LeGuen, Renaud Clement, Sophie T Brouard, Audrey Farrugia, Mathilde Ducloyer
{"title":"Post-mortem fundus examination after sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI): can we do better? a study based on the French SUDI registry.","authors":"Romain Provost, Jean- Baptiste Ducloyer, Caroline Rambaud, Christele Gras-LeGuen, Renaud Clement, Sophie T Brouard, Audrey Farrugia, Mathilde Ducloyer","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03613-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fundus examination is crucial to assess retinal haemorrhages after sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), to rule out fatal abusive head trauma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine how many SUDI cases in France underwent a fundus examination, and to identify factors associated with its completion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Children who died from SUDI included in the French SUDI registry were analysed. It was determined whether a fundus examination had been performed and, if so, whether the results showed the presence of retinal haemorrhages. Groups having undergone or not fundus examinations were compared in terms of age at death, gender, perinatal history, need for resuscitation, post-mortem investigations (brain imaging, autopsy), potential prosecutor's intervention, and presence of traumatic injuries. A survey was sent to referral centres to determine whether and how they performed fundus examinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 1,326 cases of SUDI occurring between 2015 and 2022, of which 252 (19%) underwent fundus examinations, with a significant increase from 10 (9.3%) in 2015 to 57 (31.8%) in 2022 (p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed between the groups with and without fundus examination in the number of autopsies (217 [86.8%] vs. 845 [79%]; p = 0.004), and the presence of traumatic injuries (15 [6.4%] vs. 23 [2.3%]; p = 0.003). Retinal haemorrhages were detected in 26 children, and were significantly associated with higher rates of prosecutor's interventions after hospital admission (12 [57.1%] vs. 32 [16.2%]; p < 0.001), cardiac activity resumption (9 [40.9%] vs. 17 [7.9%]; p < 0.001) and traumatic injuries (14 [53.8%] vs. 1 [0.5%]; p < 0.001). Of the 34 centres surveyed, 15 completed the questionnaire, and only 5 reported regularly performing fundus examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A fundus examination is performed in only 19% of SUDI cases in France. Efforts should be made to generalize this examination to avoid missing out fatal abusive head trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03613-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fundus examination is crucial to assess retinal haemorrhages after sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), to rule out fatal abusive head trauma.

Objective: To determine how many SUDI cases in France underwent a fundus examination, and to identify factors associated with its completion.

Method: Children who died from SUDI included in the French SUDI registry were analysed. It was determined whether a fundus examination had been performed and, if so, whether the results showed the presence of retinal haemorrhages. Groups having undergone or not fundus examinations were compared in terms of age at death, gender, perinatal history, need for resuscitation, post-mortem investigations (brain imaging, autopsy), potential prosecutor's intervention, and presence of traumatic injuries. A survey was sent to referral centres to determine whether and how they performed fundus examinations.

Results: Our study included 1,326 cases of SUDI occurring between 2015 and 2022, of which 252 (19%) underwent fundus examinations, with a significant increase from 10 (9.3%) in 2015 to 57 (31.8%) in 2022 (p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed between the groups with and without fundus examination in the number of autopsies (217 [86.8%] vs. 845 [79%]; p = 0.004), and the presence of traumatic injuries (15 [6.4%] vs. 23 [2.3%]; p = 0.003). Retinal haemorrhages were detected in 26 children, and were significantly associated with higher rates of prosecutor's interventions after hospital admission (12 [57.1%] vs. 32 [16.2%]; p < 0.001), cardiac activity resumption (9 [40.9%] vs. 17 [7.9%]; p < 0.001) and traumatic injuries (14 [53.8%] vs. 1 [0.5%]; p < 0.001). Of the 34 centres surveyed, 15 completed the questionnaire, and only 5 reported regularly performing fundus examinations.

Conclusion: A fundus examination is performed in only 19% of SUDI cases in France. Efforts should be made to generalize this examination to avoid missing out fatal abusive head trauma.

婴儿突发性死亡(SUDI)后的尸检眼底检查:我们能做得更好吗?这是一项基于法国SUDI登记处的研究。
背景:眼底检查是评估婴儿猝死(SUDI)后视网膜出血的关键,以排除致命的虐待性头部创伤。目的:确定法国有多少SUDI病例接受了眼底检查,并确定与完成检查相关的因素。方法:对法国SUDI登记中因SUDI死亡的儿童进行分析。确定是否进行了眼底检查,如果进行了检查,结果是否显示存在视网膜出血。在死亡年龄、性别、围产期史、复苏需要、死后调查(脑成像、尸检)、可能的检察官干预和是否存在创伤性损伤方面,比较了接受或未接受眼底检查的组。向转诊中心发送了一份调查,以确定它们是否以及如何进行眼底检查。结果:我们的研究纳入了2015年至2022年间发生的1,326例SUDI病例,其中252例(19%)接受了眼底检查,从2015年的10例(9.3%)显著增加到2022年的57例(31.8%)(p结论:在法国,只有19%的SUDI病例进行了眼底检查。应努力推广这种检查,以避免遗漏致命的虐待性头部创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信