Pinyin Cao, Yao Liu, Jiannan Zhao, Xingyu Lyu, Xiaoqing Li, Haozhe Chen, Peng Wang, Zhan Su, Guomin Wu, Mengjie Wu, Nan Jiang, Ruiye Bi, Songsong Zhu
{"title":"A prospective cohort study on the efficacy of conservative and surgical treatments for patients with ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint.","authors":"Pinyin Cao, Yao Liu, Jiannan Zhao, Xingyu Lyu, Xiaoqing Li, Haozhe Chen, Peng Wang, Zhan Su, Guomin Wu, Mengjie Wu, Nan Jiang, Ruiye Bi, Songsong Zhu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000003500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment options for anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR) of the temporomandibular joint are conservative and surgical treatments; however, current therapeutic strategies for ADDwoR remain highly heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these two treatment options in symptom alleviation and orofacial functional restoration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The age of the patients was 18 years or older, and they underwent treatment for ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint from December 2022 to February 2024, with patients providing 12-month follow-up data on pain, mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency. The difference in the change in joint pain levels between the two methods was assessed from the baseline to the 12-month follow-up period. Mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency were assessed by pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO) and the temporomandibular joint chewing function self-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 participants (mean [SD] age = 31.9 [12.9] years; 195 [89%] women) were included in this study, and the conservative treatment group and surgical treatment group included 123 individuals (mean [SD] age = 32.9 [12.7] years; 113 [92%] women) and 95 individuals (mean [SD] age = 30.6 [13.1] years; 82 [86%] women), respectively. Both the conservative treatments (mean change = - 2.45 [95% CI = - 3.031 to -1.864] points) and surgical treatments (mean change = - 2.24 [95% CI -2.867 to -1.603] points) resulted in a clinically important pain reduction at 12 months. However, there was no significant difference in the effects of conservative and surgical treatments on pain reduction (P = 0.5737). The results of the secondary outcomes were mostly in line with those of the primary outcomes. Interestingly, among middle-aged and elderly patients with limited mouth opening, surgical treatments demonstrated a superior restoration of mouth-opening capacity compared to conservative treatments (P = 0.0049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort study of individuals with ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint, both conservative and surgical treatments significantly improved clinically relevant pain, mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency in patients. And surgical intervention demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing mouth opening among middle-aged and elderly patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The treatment options for anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR) of the temporomandibular joint are conservative and surgical treatments; however, current therapeutic strategies for ADDwoR remain highly heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these two treatment options in symptom alleviation and orofacial functional restoration.
Methods: The age of the patients was 18 years or older, and they underwent treatment for ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint from December 2022 to February 2024, with patients providing 12-month follow-up data on pain, mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency. The difference in the change in joint pain levels between the two methods was assessed from the baseline to the 12-month follow-up period. Mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency were assessed by pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO) and the temporomandibular joint chewing function self-test.
Results: A total of 218 participants (mean [SD] age = 31.9 [12.9] years; 195 [89%] women) were included in this study, and the conservative treatment group and surgical treatment group included 123 individuals (mean [SD] age = 32.9 [12.7] years; 113 [92%] women) and 95 individuals (mean [SD] age = 30.6 [13.1] years; 82 [86%] women), respectively. Both the conservative treatments (mean change = - 2.45 [95% CI = - 3.031 to -1.864] points) and surgical treatments (mean change = - 2.24 [95% CI -2.867 to -1.603] points) resulted in a clinically important pain reduction at 12 months. However, there was no significant difference in the effects of conservative and surgical treatments on pain reduction (P = 0.5737). The results of the secondary outcomes were mostly in line with those of the primary outcomes. Interestingly, among middle-aged and elderly patients with limited mouth opening, surgical treatments demonstrated a superior restoration of mouth-opening capacity compared to conservative treatments (P = 0.0049).
Conclusions: In this cohort study of individuals with ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint, both conservative and surgical treatments significantly improved clinically relevant pain, mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency in patients. And surgical intervention demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing mouth opening among middle-aged and elderly patient.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.