A prospective cohort study on the efficacy of conservative and surgical treatments for patients with ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint.

IF 10.1 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Pinyin Cao, Yao Liu, Jiannan Zhao, Xingyu Lyu, Xiaoqing Li, Haozhe Chen, Peng Wang, Zhan Su, Guomin Wu, Mengjie Wu, Nan Jiang, Ruiye Bi, Songsong Zhu
{"title":"A prospective cohort study on the efficacy of conservative and surgical treatments for patients with ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint.","authors":"Pinyin Cao, Yao Liu, Jiannan Zhao, Xingyu Lyu, Xiaoqing Li, Haozhe Chen, Peng Wang, Zhan Su, Guomin Wu, Mengjie Wu, Nan Jiang, Ruiye Bi, Songsong Zhu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000003500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment options for anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR) of the temporomandibular joint are conservative and surgical treatments; however, current therapeutic strategies for ADDwoR remain highly heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these two treatment options in symptom alleviation and orofacial functional restoration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The age of the patients was 18 years or older, and they underwent treatment for ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint from December 2022 to February 2024, with patients providing 12-month follow-up data on pain, mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency. The difference in the change in joint pain levels between the two methods was assessed from the baseline to the 12-month follow-up period. Mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency were assessed by pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO) and the temporomandibular joint chewing function self-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 participants (mean [SD] age = 31.9 [12.9] years; 195 [89%] women) were included in this study, and the conservative treatment group and surgical treatment group included 123 individuals (mean [SD] age = 32.9 [12.7] years; 113 [92%] women) and 95 individuals (mean [SD] age = 30.6 [13.1] years; 82 [86%] women), respectively. Both the conservative treatments (mean change = - 2.45 [95% CI = - 3.031 to -1.864] points) and surgical treatments (mean change = - 2.24 [95% CI -2.867 to -1.603] points) resulted in a clinically important pain reduction at 12 months. However, there was no significant difference in the effects of conservative and surgical treatments on pain reduction (P = 0.5737). The results of the secondary outcomes were mostly in line with those of the primary outcomes. Interestingly, among middle-aged and elderly patients with limited mouth opening, surgical treatments demonstrated a superior restoration of mouth-opening capacity compared to conservative treatments (P = 0.0049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort study of individuals with ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint, both conservative and surgical treatments significantly improved clinically relevant pain, mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency in patients. And surgical intervention demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing mouth opening among middle-aged and elderly patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment options for anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR) of the temporomandibular joint are conservative and surgical treatments; however, current therapeutic strategies for ADDwoR remain highly heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these two treatment options in symptom alleviation and orofacial functional restoration.

Methods: The age of the patients was 18 years or older, and they underwent treatment for ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint from December 2022 to February 2024, with patients providing 12-month follow-up data on pain, mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency. The difference in the change in joint pain levels between the two methods was assessed from the baseline to the 12-month follow-up period. Mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency were assessed by pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO) and the temporomandibular joint chewing function self-test.

Results: A total of 218 participants (mean [SD] age = 31.9 [12.9] years; 195 [89%] women) were included in this study, and the conservative treatment group and surgical treatment group included 123 individuals (mean [SD] age = 32.9 [12.7] years; 113 [92%] women) and 95 individuals (mean [SD] age = 30.6 [13.1] years; 82 [86%] women), respectively. Both the conservative treatments (mean change = - 2.45 [95% CI = - 3.031 to -1.864] points) and surgical treatments (mean change = - 2.24 [95% CI -2.867 to -1.603] points) resulted in a clinically important pain reduction at 12 months. However, there was no significant difference in the effects of conservative and surgical treatments on pain reduction (P = 0.5737). The results of the secondary outcomes were mostly in line with those of the primary outcomes. Interestingly, among middle-aged and elderly patients with limited mouth opening, surgical treatments demonstrated a superior restoration of mouth-opening capacity compared to conservative treatments (P = 0.0049).

Conclusions: In this cohort study of individuals with ADDwoR of the temporomandibular joint, both conservative and surgical treatments significantly improved clinically relevant pain, mouth-opening capacity and chewing efficiency in patients. And surgical intervention demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing mouth opening among middle-aged and elderly patient.

一项关于保守和手术治疗颞下颌关节adwor患者疗效的前瞻性队列研究。
背景:颞下颌关节前椎间盘不复位移位(ADDwoR)的治疗选择是保守治疗和手术治疗;然而,目前针对ADDwoR的治疗策略仍然高度不一致。本研究旨在评估这两种治疗方案在缓解症状和恢复口面部功能方面的有效性。方法:患者年龄在18岁及以上,于2022年12月至2024年2月接受颞下颌关节adwor治疗,随访12个月,随访疼痛、张口能力和咀嚼效率。从基线到12个月的随访期间,评估两种方法之间关节疼痛水平变化的差异。采用无痛最大张口量(MMO)和颞下颌关节咀嚼功能自测评估大鼠的张口能力和咀嚼效率。结果:本研究共纳入218例患者(平均[SD]年龄31.9[12.9]岁,女性195例[89%]),其中保守治疗组123例(平均[SD]年龄32.9[12.7]岁,女性113例(92%)),手术治疗组95例(平均[SD]年龄30.6[13.1]岁,女性82例(86%))。保守治疗(平均变化= - 2.45 [95% CI = - 3.031至-1.864]点)和手术治疗(平均变化= - 2.24 [95% CI = -2.867至-1.603]点)在12个月时均获得临床重要的疼痛减轻。然而,保守治疗和手术治疗在减轻疼痛方面的效果无显著差异(P = 0.5737)。次要结局的结果与主要结局的结果基本一致。有趣的是,在张嘴受限的中老年患者中,与保守治疗相比,手术治疗显示出更好的张嘴能力恢复(P = 0.0049)。结论:在这项针对颞下颌关节ADDwoR患者的队列研究中,保守治疗和手术治疗均可显著改善患者的临床相关疼痛、张口能力和咀嚼效率。手术干预对提高中老年患者的口腔张开效果更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信