Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of 4-fluoroetomidate (NH600001) in healthy subjects: a first-in-human, randomised, controlled, phase I study
Yuanyuan Sun , Jie Huang , Kaiming Duan , Yaqi Lin , Qian Wu , Jinlian Xie , Can Guo , Yajie Cao , Ling Ye , Shuang Yang , Saiying Wang , Guo-Ping Yang
{"title":"Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of 4-fluoroetomidate (NH600001) in healthy subjects: a first-in-human, randomised, controlled, phase I study","authors":"Yuanyuan Sun , Jie Huang , Kaiming Duan , Yaqi Lin , Qian Wu , Jinlian Xie , Can Guo , Yajie Cao , Ling Ye , Shuang Yang , Saiying Wang , Guo-Ping Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>NH600001 (formerly EL-0052) is a novel 4-fluoroetomidate formulated as a lipid emulsion. This first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose trial aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of NH600001.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty-eight healthy volunteers were randomized into seven dose cohorts (0.04–0.40 mg/kg). Each cohort included NH600001, placebo, and etomidate as an active comparator. The injectable emulsion was administered as a single, 10 mL intravenous dose over one minute using a syringe pump. Safety was assessed by clinical evaluations, laboratory tests, electrocardiography, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Plasma drug concentrations were measured for PK analysis, and bispectral index (BIS), modified observer assessment of alertness/sedation (MOAA/S), and eyelash reflex were used as PD indicators.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 88 participants, 58 received NH600001, 16 received etomidate, and 14 received placebo. A total of 57 subjects (64.8 %) reported 130 TEAEs, most of which were mild; no serious adverse events were reported. TEAE incidence was 62.1 % in the NH600001 group, 81.3 % in the etomidate group, and 57.1 % in the placebo group. NH600001 did not induce adrenocortical suppression, in contrast to etomidate. Across the dose groups, the mean time to maximum plasma concentration (T<sub>max</sub>) ranged from 2.5 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 3.3 min, while the mean terminal half-life (t<sub>1/2</sub>) ranged from 4.9 to 38.6 h. A linear dose–exposure relationship was observed for area under the concentration–time curve from zero to infinity (AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>) and to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0–t</sub>) across 0.04–0.40 mg/kg. At 0.26 mg/kg, NH600001 produced anesthetic onset (1.8 min) and duration (4.9 min) comparable to 0.30 mg/kg etomidate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>NH600001 demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability, with reduced adrenocortical suppression compared to etomidate. Doses of 0.20–0.30 mg/kg are supported for further clinical development. These findings suggest NH600001 may offer a promising alternative to etomidate by preserving anesthetic efficacy while minimizing endocrine adverse effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107317"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092809872500315X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
NH600001 (formerly EL-0052) is a novel 4-fluoroetomidate formulated as a lipid emulsion. This first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose trial aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of NH600001.
Methods
Eighty-eight healthy volunteers were randomized into seven dose cohorts (0.04–0.40 mg/kg). Each cohort included NH600001, placebo, and etomidate as an active comparator. The injectable emulsion was administered as a single, 10 mL intravenous dose over one minute using a syringe pump. Safety was assessed by clinical evaluations, laboratory tests, electrocardiography, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Plasma drug concentrations were measured for PK analysis, and bispectral index (BIS), modified observer assessment of alertness/sedation (MOAA/S), and eyelash reflex were used as PD indicators.
Results
Of 88 participants, 58 received NH600001, 16 received etomidate, and 14 received placebo. A total of 57 subjects (64.8 %) reported 130 TEAEs, most of which were mild; no serious adverse events were reported. TEAE incidence was 62.1 % in the NH600001 group, 81.3 % in the etomidate group, and 57.1 % in the placebo group. NH600001 did not induce adrenocortical suppression, in contrast to etomidate. Across the dose groups, the mean time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) ranged from 2.5 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 3.3 min, while the mean terminal half-life (t1/2) ranged from 4.9 to 38.6 h. A linear dose–exposure relationship was observed for area under the concentration–time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0–∞) and to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–t) across 0.04–0.40 mg/kg. At 0.26 mg/kg, NH600001 produced anesthetic onset (1.8 min) and duration (4.9 min) comparable to 0.30 mg/kg etomidate.
Conclusions
NH600001 demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability, with reduced adrenocortical suppression compared to etomidate. Doses of 0.20–0.30 mg/kg are supported for further clinical development. These findings suggest NH600001 may offer a promising alternative to etomidate by preserving anesthetic efficacy while minimizing endocrine adverse effects.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development.
More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making.
Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.