Right ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters based on pressure-volume loop theory in heart failure.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yoshitaka Isotani, Eisuke Amiya, Masaru Hatano, Junichi Ishida, Masaki Tsuji, Chie Bujo, Shun Minatsuki, Takahiro Kurihara, Satoshi Ishii, Hiroki Yagi, Akihito Saito, Hiroyuki Kiriyama, Genri Numata, Saki Kaneko, Satoru Ando, Kei Morishita, Norifumi Takeda, Issei Komuro, Norihiko Takeda
{"title":"Right ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters based on pressure-volume loop theory in heart failure.","authors":"Yoshitaka Isotani, Eisuke Amiya, Masaru Hatano, Junichi Ishida, Masaki Tsuji, Chie Bujo, Shun Minatsuki, Takahiro Kurihara, Satoshi Ishii, Hiroki Yagi, Akihito Saito, Hiroyuki Kiriyama, Genri Numata, Saki Kaneko, Satoru Ando, Kei Morishita, Norifumi Takeda, Issei Komuro, Norihiko Takeda","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.09.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the clinical utility of right ventricular (RV) systolic and diastolic parameters derived from the RV pressure waveform obtained through right heart catheterization (RHC) based on pressure-volume (PV) loop theory in patients with heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients hospitalized for advanced HF who underwent RHC at our institution. RV end-systolic elastance (Ees), RV arterial elastance (Ea), RVEes/Ea ratio and RV diastolic stiffness coefficient (β) were calculated from RV pressure waveforms. The prognostic value of these parameters was evaluated for the primary outcome defined as all-cause mortality or urgent HF-related hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 254 patients were analyzed, including 141 with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and 113 with LVEF ≥40%. Among the RV systolic and diastolic parameters, a low RVEes/Ea ratio (<0.55) (hazard ratio [HR], 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-6.9; p < 0.001) and an elevated RVβ (≥0.025) (HR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.5-9.0; p < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome. In those with LVEF <40%, a low RVEes/Ea ratio was a stronger independent predictor of the primary outcome (HR, 3.5; 95%CI, 1.6-7.5; p = 0.002), whereas in those with LVEF ≥40%, elevated RVβ was the more significant independent risk factor (HR, 3.0; 95%CI, 1.1-8.2; p = 0.029), even after multiple adjustments for covariate factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RV waveform evaluation based on PV loop theory was effective in predicting prognosis in HF patients, irrespective of LVEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.09.048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the clinical utility of right ventricular (RV) systolic and diastolic parameters derived from the RV pressure waveform obtained through right heart catheterization (RHC) based on pressure-volume (PV) loop theory in patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods: The study included patients hospitalized for advanced HF who underwent RHC at our institution. RV end-systolic elastance (Ees), RV arterial elastance (Ea), RVEes/Ea ratio and RV diastolic stiffness coefficient (β) were calculated from RV pressure waveforms. The prognostic value of these parameters was evaluated for the primary outcome defined as all-cause mortality or urgent HF-related hospitalization.

Results: A total of 254 patients were analyzed, including 141 with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and 113 with LVEF ≥40%. Among the RV systolic and diastolic parameters, a low RVEes/Ea ratio (<0.55) (hazard ratio [HR], 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-6.9; p < 0.001) and an elevated RVβ (≥0.025) (HR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.5-9.0; p < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome. In those with LVEF <40%, a low RVEes/Ea ratio was a stronger independent predictor of the primary outcome (HR, 3.5; 95%CI, 1.6-7.5; p = 0.002), whereas in those with LVEF ≥40%, elevated RVβ was the more significant independent risk factor (HR, 3.0; 95%CI, 1.1-8.2; p = 0.029), even after multiple adjustments for covariate factors.

Conclusion: RV waveform evaluation based on PV loop theory was effective in predicting prognosis in HF patients, irrespective of LVEF.

基于压力-容量循环理论的心衰右心室收缩和舒张参数。
背景:本研究旨在评估基于压力-容积(PV)循环理论的右心导管(RHC)获得的右心室压力波形所衍生的右心室收缩和舒张参数在心力衰竭(HF)患者中的临床应用。方法:本研究纳入了在我院接受RHC治疗的晚期心衰住院患者。根据右心室压力波形计算右心室收缩末期弹性(Ees)、右心室动脉弹性(Ea)、rvee /Ea比值和右心室舒张刚度系数(β)。这些参数的预后价值被评估为主要结局定义为全因死亡率或hf相关的紧急住院。结果:共分析254例患者,其中141例伴有左室射血分数(LVEF)。结论:不论LVEF如何,基于PV环路理论的RV波形评价均可有效预测HF患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.10%
发文量
546
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信