Sensory-emotional-cognitive effects of resistance exercise and Tai Chi exercise in Japanese community-dwelling older adults with chronic pain: a non-randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Cen Chen, Takafumi Saito, Lefei Wang, Harukaze Yatsugi, Ziming Gong, Sitong Li, Hiro Kishimoto
{"title":"Sensory-emotional-cognitive effects of resistance exercise and Tai Chi exercise in Japanese community-dwelling older adults with chronic pain: a non-randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Cen Chen, Takafumi Saito, Lefei Wang, Harukaze Yatsugi, Ziming Gong, Sitong Li, Hiro Kishimoto","doi":"10.1186/s12906-025-05100-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although Tai Chi has demonstrated efficacy in alleviating pain and improving functional mobility in people with chronic pain, the mechanisms underlying its pain-relieving effects remain poorly understood. We assessed the efficacy of a Tai Chi intervention on pain-related sensory, emotional, and cognitive indices in Japanese community-dwelling older adults with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted for 12 weeks in the community of Itoshima City, Fukuoka, Japan. Adults aged ≥ 60 years with chronic pain were recruited and allocated to an intervention group or a control group. A total of 84 participants were allocated, with 44 in the intervention group and 40 in the control group. Chronic pain was defined as musculoskeletal pain lasting ≥ 3 months. Baseline characteristics of participants included age, sex, education, body mass index, comorbidities, current tobacco consumption, current alcohol consumption, and fall history. The control group received resistance training; the intervention group received resistance training and Tai Chi exercise. The main outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention: a pain numeric rating scale (NRS), the pressure pain threshold (PPT), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). As secondary outcomes, TSK and PCS subscales were evaluated with the same procedures. The statistical analyses used the t-test, χ<sup>2</sup>-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and analysis of covariance with adjustment for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No baseline characteristics differed significantly between the groups. At 12 weeks, the intervention group showed significant improvements in the NRS (p = 0.02, 95%CI: -2.20, - 0.18), PPT (p = 0.003, 95%CI: 0.22, 0.99), TSK (p = 0.004, 95%CI: -6.35, - 1.22), and PCS (p = 0.01, 95%CI: -10.18, - 1.43) versus the control group. There was no significant between-group difference in the CSI values. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, significant interactions were revealed between time and group for PPT (p = 0.02), TSK (p = 0.02), and PCS (p = 0.03) as well as the subscales TSK-Somatic Focus (p = 0.02) and PCS-Rumination (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tai Chi intervention may serve as a potential treatment for chronic pain by addressing sensory, emotional, and cognitive aspects of pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000052727, Date: 2023-11-13. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058307 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"25 1","pages":"367"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-025-05100-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although Tai Chi has demonstrated efficacy in alleviating pain and improving functional mobility in people with chronic pain, the mechanisms underlying its pain-relieving effects remain poorly understood. We assessed the efficacy of a Tai Chi intervention on pain-related sensory, emotional, and cognitive indices in Japanese community-dwelling older adults with chronic pain.

Methods: A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted for 12 weeks in the community of Itoshima City, Fukuoka, Japan. Adults aged ≥ 60 years with chronic pain were recruited and allocated to an intervention group or a control group. A total of 84 participants were allocated, with 44 in the intervention group and 40 in the control group. Chronic pain was defined as musculoskeletal pain lasting ≥ 3 months. Baseline characteristics of participants included age, sex, education, body mass index, comorbidities, current tobacco consumption, current alcohol consumption, and fall history. The control group received resistance training; the intervention group received resistance training and Tai Chi exercise. The main outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention: a pain numeric rating scale (NRS), the pressure pain threshold (PPT), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). As secondary outcomes, TSK and PCS subscales were evaluated with the same procedures. The statistical analyses used the t-test, χ2-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and analysis of covariance with adjustment for baseline characteristics.

Results: No baseline characteristics differed significantly between the groups. At 12 weeks, the intervention group showed significant improvements in the NRS (p = 0.02, 95%CI: -2.20, - 0.18), PPT (p = 0.003, 95%CI: 0.22, 0.99), TSK (p = 0.004, 95%CI: -6.35, - 1.22), and PCS (p = 0.01, 95%CI: -10.18, - 1.43) versus the control group. There was no significant between-group difference in the CSI values. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, significant interactions were revealed between time and group for PPT (p = 0.02), TSK (p = 0.02), and PCS (p = 0.03) as well as the subscales TSK-Somatic Focus (p = 0.02) and PCS-Rumination (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: Tai Chi intervention may serve as a potential treatment for chronic pain by addressing sensory, emotional, and cognitive aspects of pain.

Trial registration: The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000052727, Date: 2023-11-13. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058307 .

抗阻运动和太极拳运动对日本社区慢性疼痛老年人的感觉-情绪-认知影响:一项非随机对照试验。
背景:虽然太极拳已被证明对慢性疼痛患者有缓解疼痛和改善功能活动的功效,但其缓解疼痛作用的机制仍然知之甚少。我们评估了太极拳干预对日本社区慢性疼痛老年人疼痛相关感觉、情绪和认知指标的疗效。方法:在日本福冈伊德岛市社区进行为期12周的非随机对照试验。招募年龄≥60岁的慢性疼痛成人,并将其分配到干预组或对照组。共分配84名参与者,干预组44名,对照组40名。慢性疼痛定义为持续≥3个月的肌肉骨骼疼痛。参与者的基线特征包括年龄、性别、受教育程度、体重指数、合并症、当前烟草消费、当前酒精消费和跌倒史。对照组接受抗阻训练;干预组接受抗阻训练和太极锻炼。在基线和干预12周后评估主要结果:疼痛数值评定量表(NRS)、压痛阈值(PPT)、坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和中枢致敏量表(CSI)。作为次要结果,TSK和PCS量表采用相同的方法进行评估。统计分析采用t检验、χ2检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验和基线特征调整协方差分析。结果:两组间基线特征无显著差异。12周时,干预组在NRS (p = 0.02, 95%CI: -2.20, - 0.18)、PPT (p = 0.003, 95%CI: 0.22, 0.99)、TSK (p = 0.004, 95%CI: -6.35, - 1.22)和PCS (p = 0.01, 95%CI: -10.18, - 1.43)方面均较对照组有显著改善。两组间CSI值无显著差异。调整基线特征后,PPT (p = 0.02)、TSK (p = 0.02)和PCS (p = 0.03)以及TSK-躯体焦点(p = 0.02)和PCS-反刍(p = 0.01)的时间和组间存在显著交互作用。结论:通过解决疼痛的感觉、情绪和认知方面的问题,太极干预可能作为慢性疼痛的潜在治疗方法。试验注册:大学医院医学信息网临床试验注册中心,编号:UMIN000052727,日期:2023-11-13。https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058307。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信