Effects of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies on arterial oxygenation in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Isabel Blanco, Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Lucilla Piccari, Agustín Roberto Garcia, Elena Gimeno-Santos, Ana M Ramírez, Joan Albert Barberà
{"title":"Effects of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies on arterial oxygenation in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Isabel Blanco, Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Lucilla Piccari, Agustín Roberto Garcia, Elena Gimeno-Santos, Ana M Ramírez, Joan Albert Barberà","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with lung disease entails a poor prognosis. There is concern about the potential deleterious effect on gas exchange of drugs approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients with lung disease. We conducted a systematic review on the effects of drugs approved for PAH on arterial oxygenation in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) conducted in patients with PH associated with lung disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched until May 2025. We included RCTs with PAH therapies in patients with PH associated with lung disease that reported measurements of arterial oxygenation, either the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>) or the arterial oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>). For analysis purposes, both measurements were merged into one single variable called 'overall oxygenation'. As secondary outcomes, we analysed the use of supplemental oxygen and the presence of adverse events related to oxygenation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 393 reports returned by the initial search, nine articles, reporting 827 patients (64.6% male), were included. The overall oxygenation at the end of the trial in the intervention group (IG), treated with a PAH therapy, was similar to the control group (standard mean difference (SMD) -0.00; 95% CI -0.17 to 0.18; p=0.98). Similarly, the change in overall oxygenation postintervention in the IG was similar to the control group (SMD 0.01; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.24; p=0.91). Reported adverse events related to oxygenation were similar in the treatment and control arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is currently no consistent evidence from RCTs to suggest a deleterious effect of PAH therapies on arterial oxygenation in patients with PH associated with lung disease.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022349299.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with lung disease entails a poor prognosis. There is concern about the potential deleterious effect on gas exchange of drugs approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients with lung disease. We conducted a systematic review on the effects of drugs approved for PAH on arterial oxygenation in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) conducted in patients with PH associated with lung disease.

Methods: Five databases were searched until May 2025. We included RCTs with PAH therapies in patients with PH associated with lung disease that reported measurements of arterial oxygenation, either the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) or the arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). For analysis purposes, both measurements were merged into one single variable called 'overall oxygenation'. As secondary outcomes, we analysed the use of supplemental oxygen and the presence of adverse events related to oxygenation.

Results: Of the 393 reports returned by the initial search, nine articles, reporting 827 patients (64.6% male), were included. The overall oxygenation at the end of the trial in the intervention group (IG), treated with a PAH therapy, was similar to the control group (standard mean difference (SMD) -0.00; 95% CI -0.17 to 0.18; p=0.98). Similarly, the change in overall oxygenation postintervention in the IG was similar to the control group (SMD 0.01; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.24; p=0.91). Reported adverse events related to oxygenation were similar in the treatment and control arms.

Conclusion: There is currently no consistent evidence from RCTs to suggest a deleterious effect of PAH therapies on arterial oxygenation in patients with PH associated with lung disease.

Prospero registration number: CRD42022349299.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肺动脉高压治疗对肺动脉高压合并肺部疾病患者动脉氧合的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:肺动脉高压(PH)与肺部疾病相关,预后较差。已批准用于肺部疾病患者肺动脉高压(PAH)的药物对气体交换的潜在有害影响令人担忧。我们对在肺疾病相关PH患者中进行的随机临床试验(RCTs)中批准用于PAH的药物对动脉氧合的影响进行了系统回顾。方法:检索至2025年5月的5个数据库。我们纳入了对肺疾病相关PH患者进行PAH治疗的随机对照试验,这些患者报告了动脉氧合的测量,无论是动脉氧分压(PaO2)还是动脉氧饱和度(SpO2)。为了分析的目的,这两个测量结果被合并为一个单一的变量,称为“总氧合”。作为次要结局,我们分析了补充氧的使用和与氧合相关的不良事件的存在。结果:在初始检索返回的393篇报告中,纳入了9篇文章,报告了827例患者(64.6%为男性)。采用PAH治疗的干预组(IG)在试验结束时的总氧合与对照组相似(标准平均差(SMD) -0.00;95% CI -0.17 ~ 0.18;p = 0.98)。同样,IG干预后总体氧合变化与对照组相似(SMD为0.01;95% CI为-0.22 ~ 0.24;p=0.91)。治疗组和对照组报告的与氧合相关的不良事件相似。结论:目前没有来自随机对照试验的一致证据表明PAH治疗对肺部疾病相关PH患者的动脉氧合有有害影响。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42022349299。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信