The Efficacy of Hemostatic Agents on Radial Artery Compression Methods Following Transradial Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Carlos De Melo Neto, Mariana Kondo Obara, Denise Filippini, Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Dilson Pimentel Junior, Milena Monteiro Mastra, Enrico Prajiante Bertolino, Grace Carvajal Mulatti
{"title":"The Efficacy of Hemostatic Agents on Radial Artery Compression Methods Following Transradial Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Carlos De Melo Neto, Mariana Kondo Obara, Denise Filippini, Miguel Godeiro Fernandez, Dilson Pimentel Junior, Milena Monteiro Mastra, Enrico Prajiante Bertolino, Grace Carvajal Mulatti","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radial artery hemostasis in patients undergoing transradial procedures can be achieved through various compression methods, including manual or mechanical devices, with or without the use of hemostatic agents, and may involve patent hemostasis or concomitant ulnar compression. Previous findings suggest that radial artery compression should be maintained for 120 minutes post-procedure. However, the optimal compression method and the efficiency of hemostatic agents remain uncertain. Therefore, we decided to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of radial artery compression with adjunctive hemostatic agents versus compression without hemostatic agents on patients following transradial procedures. The systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. The outcomes evaluated were: time to achieve hemostasis (TAH), failure to achieve hemostasis (FAH), 24-hour radial artery occlusion (24-RAO), and hematoma occurrence. We performed subgroup analyses separating manual and mechanical compression with hemostatic agents. 13 randomized controlled trials were included, comprising 6,588 patients. 2,924 (44.4%) patients underwent compression with hemostatic agents, and 3,664 (55.6%) underwent compression without hemostatic agents. The statistical analysis indicated that hemostatic agents were associated with a significantly reduced TAH (MD -86.59 min; 95% CI -106.88 to -66.30; p < 0.01) compared to compressions without hemostatic agents. No statistical difference was found between the methods regarding 24-RAO, FAH, and hematoma occurrence. However, subgroup analyses revealed that, in the manual compression with hemostatic agents subgroup, 24-RAO was also significantly reduced (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). In conclusion, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals that compression with hemostatic agents, compared to compressions without hemostatic agents, can reduce TAH without compromising the occurrence of hematomas for patients following transradial procedures. 24-RAO was also less frequent in patients who underwent manual compression with hemostatic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Radial artery hemostasis in patients undergoing transradial procedures can be achieved through various compression methods, including manual or mechanical devices, with or without the use of hemostatic agents, and may involve patent hemostasis or concomitant ulnar compression. Previous findings suggest that radial artery compression should be maintained for 120 minutes post-procedure. However, the optimal compression method and the efficiency of hemostatic agents remain uncertain. Therefore, we decided to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of radial artery compression with adjunctive hemostatic agents versus compression without hemostatic agents on patients following transradial procedures. The systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. The outcomes evaluated were: time to achieve hemostasis (TAH), failure to achieve hemostasis (FAH), 24-hour radial artery occlusion (24-RAO), and hematoma occurrence. We performed subgroup analyses separating manual and mechanical compression with hemostatic agents. 13 randomized controlled trials were included, comprising 6,588 patients. 2,924 (44.4%) patients underwent compression with hemostatic agents, and 3,664 (55.6%) underwent compression without hemostatic agents. The statistical analysis indicated that hemostatic agents were associated with a significantly reduced TAH (MD -86.59 min; 95% CI -106.88 to -66.30; p < 0.01) compared to compressions without hemostatic agents. No statistical difference was found between the methods regarding 24-RAO, FAH, and hematoma occurrence. However, subgroup analyses revealed that, in the manual compression with hemostatic agents subgroup, 24-RAO was also significantly reduced (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). In conclusion, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals that compression with hemostatic agents, compared to compressions without hemostatic agents, can reduce TAH without compromising the occurrence of hematomas for patients following transradial procedures. 24-RAO was also less frequent in patients who underwent manual compression with hemostatic agents.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.