Opportunities for CMS to Further Specify and Broaden Its Approach to Assessing Unmet Medical Need in the Context of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Michael J DiStefano, R Brett McQueen, Hanke Zheng, Harry Gyimah Gyamfi, David Ameyaw, Jonathan D Campbell, Antal Zemplenyi
{"title":"Opportunities for CMS to Further Specify and Broaden Its Approach to Assessing Unmet Medical Need in the Context of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.","authors":"Michael J DiStefano, R Brett McQueen, Hanke Zheng, Harry Gyimah Gyamfi, David Ameyaw, Jonathan D Campbell, Antal Zemplenyi","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-01009-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, directing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to establish \"maximum fair prices\" for select drugs. In arriving at maximum fair prices, CMS is required to consider several criteria, including the extent to which a selected drug addresses unmet medical need (UMN). Through a targeted literature review of 48 original research studies, we identified and categorized 40 potential elements of UMN as they relate to pharmaceuticals, as well as treatment-related barriers to addressing this UMN, from the patient, caregiver, and societal perspectives. We synthesized these elements of UMN into seven domains: (1) traditional clinical effectiveness, (2) impacts on patient, caregiver, or family quality of life, (3) economic burden on the patient, caregiver, or family, (4) economic burden on society, (5) societal perspective elements, (6) elements of treatment administration, and (7) availability of other treatments. Comparing these elements with the United States Food and Drug Administration guidance regarding UMN reveals potential key gaps in the current CMS approach to assessing UMN in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, particularly regarding domains 2 through 6, including quality of life, economic burdens, societal elements, and treatment administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-01009-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, directing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to establish "maximum fair prices" for select drugs. In arriving at maximum fair prices, CMS is required to consider several criteria, including the extent to which a selected drug addresses unmet medical need (UMN). Through a targeted literature review of 48 original research studies, we identified and categorized 40 potential elements of UMN as they relate to pharmaceuticals, as well as treatment-related barriers to addressing this UMN, from the patient, caregiver, and societal perspectives. We synthesized these elements of UMN into seven domains: (1) traditional clinical effectiveness, (2) impacts on patient, caregiver, or family quality of life, (3) economic burden on the patient, caregiver, or family, (4) economic burden on society, (5) societal perspective elements, (6) elements of treatment administration, and (7) availability of other treatments. Comparing these elements with the United States Food and Drug Administration guidance regarding UMN reveals potential key gaps in the current CMS approach to assessing UMN in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, particularly regarding domains 2 through 6, including quality of life, economic burdens, societal elements, and treatment administration.

在医疗保险药品价格谈判计划的背景下,CMS进一步明确和扩大其评估未满足医疗需求的方法的机会。
《2022年美国减少通货膨胀法》建立了医疗保险药品价格谈判计划,指导医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)为选定的药品制定“最高公平价格”。在达到最大公平价格时,CMS需要考虑几个标准,包括选定药物解决未满足医疗需求(UMN)的程度。通过对48项原始研究的有针对性的文献综述,我们从患者、护理人员和社会的角度确定并分类了与药物相关的40个UMN潜在因素,以及解决该UMN的治疗相关障碍。我们将UMN的这些要素合成为七个领域:(1)传统的临床有效性,(2)对患者、护理人员或家庭生活质量的影响,(3)对患者、护理人员或家庭的经济负担,(4)对社会的经济负担,(5)社会视角因素,(6)治疗管理因素,(7)其他治疗的可用性。将这些要素与美国食品和药物管理局关于UMN的指导进行比较,揭示了当前CMS评估医疗保险药品价格谈判计划中UMN的方法中潜在的关键差距,特别是关于领域2到6,包括生活质量、经济负担、社会因素和治疗管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信