Messing up Visual Management Studies: A Problematizing Review

IF 6.4 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Kaiyu Shao, Maddy Janssens, Michelle Greenwood
{"title":"Messing up Visual Management Studies: A Problematizing Review","authors":"Kaiyu Shao,&nbsp;Maddy Janssens,&nbsp;Michelle Greenwood","doi":"10.1111/joms.13162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Management studies are increasingly turning to visual materials to generate rich insights on the complexities in organizational life, thereby developing visual management studies (VMS). In this paper, we conduct a problematizing review to re-imagine VMS so that it is better equipped to deal with the complexities or, from our perspective, the messiness in organizational life. Informed by theoretical readings in visual studies and reflexivity we analyse this research domain with three questions: (1) How is the visual conceptualized? (2) How is visual meaning decided? and, (3) how is the visual researcher depicted? Our findings show how the studies in our review tend to converge on an orderly form of knowledge production, missing out on the domain’s messy potential. Our proposal is to mess up VMS through rediscovering visual, social and philosophical perspectives that theorize the visual, cultivating the polysemy of the visual and working with the ‘inter-situality’ of visual meaning, thereby ensuring that, as visual researchers, we take responsibility for the visual in our research decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"62 7","pages":"3118-3152"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joms.13162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management studies are increasingly turning to visual materials to generate rich insights on the complexities in organizational life, thereby developing visual management studies (VMS). In this paper, we conduct a problematizing review to re-imagine VMS so that it is better equipped to deal with the complexities or, from our perspective, the messiness in organizational life. Informed by theoretical readings in visual studies and reflexivity we analyse this research domain with three questions: (1) How is the visual conceptualized? (2) How is visual meaning decided? and, (3) how is the visual researcher depicted? Our findings show how the studies in our review tend to converge on an orderly form of knowledge production, missing out on the domain’s messy potential. Our proposal is to mess up VMS through rediscovering visual, social and philosophical perspectives that theorize the visual, cultivating the polysemy of the visual and working with the ‘inter-situality’ of visual meaning, thereby ensuring that, as visual researchers, we take responsibility for the visual in our research decisions.

Abstract Image

混乱的视觉管理研究:一个有问题的回顾
管理研究越来越多地转向视觉材料,以产生对组织生活复杂性的丰富见解,从而发展了视觉管理研究(VMS)。在本文中,我们进行了一个问题化的回顾,以重新想象VMS,使其能够更好地处理复杂性,或者从我们的角度来看,组织生活中的混乱。根据视觉研究和反身性的理论阅读,我们用三个问题来分析这个研究领域:(1)视觉是如何概念化的?(2)视觉意义是如何决定的?(3)视觉研究者是如何被描述的?我们的研究结果表明,我们综述中的研究倾向于集中于有序的知识生产形式,而忽略了该领域混乱的潜力。我们的建议是通过重新发现视觉的、社会的和哲学的观点,将视觉理论化,培养视觉的多义性,并与视觉意义的“情境间性”一起工作,从而确保作为视觉研究者,我们在研究决策中对视觉负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信