Preservice teachers' assessment decisions: Exploring the role of fairness conceptions

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Amirhossein Rasooli, Michael Holden, Jorge Sinval
{"title":"Preservice teachers' assessment decisions: Exploring the role of fairness conceptions","authors":"Amirhossein Rasooli,&nbsp;Michael Holden,&nbsp;Jorge Sinval","doi":"10.1002/berj.4181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Teachers' conceptions of fairness influence their approaches to assessment. Perceptions of fairness underpin how teachers legitimate their values and provide reasons for teachers to defend assessment decisions and actions. This study therefore examined fairness conceptions at a critical stage in teachers' journey towards assessment capacity: their perceptions as teacher candidates. Specifically, we investigated 228 preservice teachers' conceptions of assessment fairness using the Classroom Assessment Fairness Inventory (CAFI). The results of an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed four factors: <i>assessment communication acts</i>, <i>grading decisions</i>, <i>responses to cheating</i> and <i>firm assessment decisions</i>. These factors highlighted the domains and underpinning principles of fairness that participating preservice teachers used to evaluate issues of fairness in assessment. The results provide initial empirical foundations to promote nuanced understandings of fairness in assessment education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51410,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal","volume":"51 5","pages":"2450-2473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.4181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers' conceptions of fairness influence their approaches to assessment. Perceptions of fairness underpin how teachers legitimate their values and provide reasons for teachers to defend assessment decisions and actions. This study therefore examined fairness conceptions at a critical stage in teachers' journey towards assessment capacity: their perceptions as teacher candidates. Specifically, we investigated 228 preservice teachers' conceptions of assessment fairness using the Classroom Assessment Fairness Inventory (CAFI). The results of an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed four factors: assessment communication acts, grading decisions, responses to cheating and firm assessment decisions. These factors highlighted the domains and underpinning principles of fairness that participating preservice teachers used to evaluate issues of fairness in assessment. The results provide initial empirical foundations to promote nuanced understandings of fairness in assessment education.

Abstract Image

职前教师评价决策:探讨公平观念的作用
教师的公平观念影响着他们的评估方法。对公平的认知支撑着教师如何使自己的价值观合法化,并为教师捍卫评估决定和行动提供理由。因此,本研究考察了教师在评估能力之旅的关键阶段的公平概念:他们作为教师候选人的看法。具体而言,我们使用课堂评估公平量表(CAFI)对228名职前教师的评估公平观念进行了调查。探索性因素分析(EFA)的结果显示了四个因素:评估沟通行为,评分决策,对作弊的反应和坚定的评估决策。这些因素突出了参与的职前教师用来评估评估中的公平问题的公平领域和基本原则。研究结果为促进对评估教育公平性的细致理解提供了初步的实证基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Educational Research Journal
British Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The British Educational Research Journal is an international peer reviewed medium for the publication of articles of interest to researchers in education and has rapidly become a major focal point for the publication of educational research from throughout the world. For further information on the association please visit the British Educational Research Association web site. The journal is interdisciplinary in approach, and includes reports of case studies, experiments and surveys, discussions of conceptual and methodological issues and of underlying assumptions in educational research, accounts of research in progress, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信